Testing Turkey’s Place Within the Maps of Global Economic, Political and Social Values

Open access


Following the attempt by Alesina and Guiliano (2013) to measure global culture and to project these measurements onto real choropleth geographical world maps, we utilize the data from the World Values Survey (WVS) to arrive at robust measurement scales of global economic, political and social values and to assess Turkey’s place within them. Our study, which is based on 92,289 representative individuals with complete data in 68 countries, representing 56.89% of the global population, looks at hard-core economic values in these countries. From our new nine dimensions for the determination of the geography of human values, based on a promax factor analysis of the available data, we use six factor analytical scores to calculate a new Global Value Development Index, which combines: avoiding economic permissiveness; avoiding racism; avoiding distrust of the army and the press; avoiding the authoritarian character; tolerance and respect; and avoiding the rejection of the market economy and democracy. Turkey is ranked 25, ahead of several EU member countries. But there are still considerable deficits concerning the liberal values components, which are very important for effective democracy, and there are very large regional differences, confirming the dictum by Huntington (1996) about Turkey as a torn country.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Abdollahian M. A. Coan T. G. Oh H. and Yeşilada B. A. 2012. Dynamics of Cultural Change: The Human Development Perspective. International Studies Quarterly 56 827-842.

  • Ahumada H. Alvaredo F. and Canavese A. 2008. Th e Monetary Method to Measure the Shadow Economy: Th e Forgotten Problem of the Initial Conditions. Economic Letters 101 97-99.

  • Alesina A. 2013. Women Fertility and the Rise in Modern Capitalism. Science 342(6157) 427-428.

  • Alesina A. and Angeletos G. M. 2005. Fairness and Redistribution. American Economic Review 95(4) 960-980.

  • Alesina A. and Fuchs-Schündeln N. 2007. Goodbye Lenin (or Not?): The Effect of Communism on People. American Economic Review 97(4) 1507-1528.

  • Alesina A. and Giuliano P. 2010. Th e Power of the Family. Journal of Economic Growth 15 93-125.

  • Alesina A. and Giuliano P. 2011. Family Ties and Political Participation Journal of the European Economic Association 9(5) 817-839.

  • Alesina A. and Guiliano P. 2013. Culture and Institutions. NBER Working Paper Series Working Paper 19750.

  • Alesina A. Cozzi G. and Mantovan N. 2012. Th e Evolution of Ideology Fairness and Redistribution. Th e Economic Journal 122 (565) 1244-1261.

  • Alesina A. Di Tella R. and MacCulloch R. 2004. Inequality and Happiness: Are Europeans and Americans Diff erent? Journal of Public Economics 88(9-10) 2009-2042.

  • Alexander A. R. Inglehart R. and Welzel C. 2012. Measuring Effective Democracy: A Defense. International Political Science Review 33(1) 41-62.

  • Barro R. J. and McCleary R. M. 2003. Religion and Economic Growth across Countries. American Sociological Review 68(5) 760-781.

  • Ben Menachem Y. 2017. Th e Two-Faced Erdoğan. Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs. Available at http://jcpa.org/the-two-faced-erdogan/.

  • Biswas A. K. Farzanegan M. R. and Th um M. 2012. Pollution shadow economy and corruption-theory and evidence Ecological Economics 75 114-125.

  • Blackburn K. Bose N. and Capassom S. 2012. Tax evasion the underground economy and financial development. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 83(2) 243-253.

  • Carkoglu A. and Rubin B. 2003. Turkey and the European Union: Domestic Processes Economic Integration and International Dynamics. London: Frank Cass and Company.

  • Chaudhuri K. Schneider F. and Chattopadhyay S. 2006. Th e size and development of the shadow economy - an empirical investigation from states of India Journal of Development Economics 80 428-443.

  • Clesse A. and Tashan S. 2004. Turkey and the EU: 2004 and beyond. Amsterdam: Dutch University Press.

  • D’Hernoncourt D. and Meon P. G. 2012. Th e not so dark side of trust: Does trust increase the size of the shadow economy? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 81 97-121.

  • Dien J. Beal D. J. and Berg P. 2005. Optimizing principal components analysis of event-related potentials: Matrix type factor loading weighting extraction and rotations Clinical Neurophysiology 16 1808-1825.

  • Diez-Nicolas J. 2007. Value Systems of Elites and Publics in the Mediterranean: Convergence and Divergence. In ‘Values and Perceptions of the Islamic and Middle Eastern Publics’ (Moaddel M. (Ed.)): 47-70 Houndmills Basingstoke Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Diez-Nicolas J. 2010. Cultural Diff erences on Values about Confl ict War and Peace. World Values Research 3(1) 1-20.

  • Dreher A. Gaston N. and Martens P. 2008. Measuring Globalisation: Gauging its Consequences. New York: Springer.

  • Eilat Y. and Zinnes C. 2002. Th e Shadow Economy in Transition Countries: Friend or Foe? A Policy Perspective World Development 30(7) 1233-1254.

  • Elgin C. and Uras B. R. 2012. Public debt sovereign default risk and shadow economy Journal of Financial Stability 9 (2013) 628-64.

  • Erişen C. Erişen E. and Özkeçeci-Taner B. 2013. Research Methods in Political Psychology. Turkish Studies 14(1) 13-33.

  • Finch H. 2006. Comparison of the Performance of Varimax and Promax Rotations: Factor Structure Recovery for Dichotomous Items Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods 10(2) Article 14.

  • Hadenius A. and Teorell J. 2005. Cultural and economic prerequisites of democracy: Reassessing recent evidence. Studies in Comparative International Development 39(4) 87-106.

  • Haferlach L. Tekin F. & Wódka J. 2017. Friends. Foes. Frenemies? Unpacking the future of EU-Turkey relations. Futures Volume 97 March 2018 Pages 53-62 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016328717300150?via%3Dihub.

  • Haller M. 2002. Th eory and Method in the Comparative Study of Values: Critique and Alternative to Inglehart. European Sociological Review 18(2) 139-158.

  • Haller M. and Hadler M. 2006. How Social Relations and Structures Can Produce Happiness and Unhappiness: An International Comparative Analysis. Social Indicators Research 75(2) 169-216.

  • Heshmati A. 2006a. Measurement of a Multidimensional Index of Globalization Global Economy Journal 6(2) Article 1.

  • Heshmati A. 2006b. Th e Relationship between Income Inequality Poverty and Globalization in Th e Impact of Globalization on the World’s Poor (M. Nissanke and E. Th orbecke (Eds.)) Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan pp. 59-93.

  • Hofstede G. 2001. Culture’s consequences: comparing values behaviors institutions and organizations across nations. Thousand Oaks Calif.: Sage Publications.

  • Hofstede G. and Minkov M. 2010. Long- versus short-term orientation: new perspectives. Asia Pacific Business Review 16(4) 493-504.

  • Hofstede G. Hofstede G. J. and Minkov M. 2010. ‘Cultures and Organizations: Soft ware of the Mind.’ Revised and expanded 3rd Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill.

  • Huntington S. P. 1996. Th e clash of civilizations and the remaking of world order. New York: Simon & Schuster.

  • IBM. 2011. IBM SPSS Statistics 20 Algorithms. Armonk New York.

  • Indjikian R. and Siegel D. S. 2005. Th e impact of investment in IT on economic performance: implications for developing countries World Development 33(5) 681-700.

  • Inglehart R. F. 2003. Islam Gender Culture and Democracy. (Ronald Inglehart Ed). Willowdale ON Canada: de Sitter.

  • Inglehart R. F. and Baker W. E. 2000. Modernization Cultural Change and the Persistence of Traditional Values. American Sociological Review 65(1) 19-51.

  • Inglehart R. F. and Norris P. 2003. Rising tide: gender equality and cultural change around the world. Cambridge UK; New York: Cambridge University Press 2003.

  • Inglehart R. F. and Welzel C. 2003. Political Culture and Democracy: Analyzing Cross-Level Linkages. Comparative Politics 36(1) 61-79.

  • Inglehart R. F. and Welzel C. 2005. Modernization Cultural Change and Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press 2005.

  • Kang S. M. 2002. A Sensitivity Analysis of the Korean Composite Environmental Index. Ecological Economics 43 159-174.

  • Kearney A. T. Inc. Th e Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. 2002. Globalization’s Last Hurrah? Foreign Policy. January/February 38-51.

  • Larrabee F. S. 2018. Troubled Partnership. U.S.-Turkish Relations in an Era of Global Geopolitical Change. Rand Corporation available at https://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG899.html.

  • Lim G.C. and V.H. Nguyen (2014) Alternative weighting approaches to computing indices of economic activity Journal of Economic Surveys in press.

  • McLeod L. D. Swygert K. A. and Th issen D. 2001. Factor analysis for items scored in two categories. In: Test scoring (D. Th issen & H. Wainer (Eds.)) pp. 189-216). Mahwah N. J.: Erlbaum.

  • Minkov M. 2009. Predictors of Diff erences in Subjective Well-Being across 97 Nations. Cross-Cultural Research 43 152-179.

  • Minkov M. and Hofstede G. 2011. Cultural diff erences in a globalizing world. Bingley UK: Emerald.

  • Minkov M. and Hofstede G. 2013. Cross-cultural analysis: the science and art of comparing the world’s modern societies and their cultures. Los Angeles: Sage.

  • Moaddel M. 2002. Th e Study of Islamic Culture and Politics: An Overview and Assessment. Annual Review of Sociology 28 359-86.

  • Moaddel M. 2003. Public Opinion in Islamic Countries: Survey Results. Footnotes 31(1).

  • Moaddel M. 2008. Religious Regimes and Prospects for Liberal Politics: Futures of Iran Iraq and Saudi-Arabia. World Values Research 1(2) 36-58.

  • Morel J. SJ. 2003. Radikale Kirchenreform: für eine mutige Erneuerung: Fakten und religionssoziologische Theorien über die Krise der katholischen Kirche von 1950 bis in die Gegenwart als Entscheidungsgrundlagen notwendiger Reformen. Innsbruck: Tyrolia-Verlag.

  • Negrón-Gonzales M. 2012. Cooperation between Secular and Religious Rights Organizations in Turkey. Turkish Studies 13(3) 415-430.

  • Neriah J. (2018) Turkey’s Expansionist Military Policies in the Middle East. Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs available at http://jcpa.org/article/turkeys-expansionist-military-policies-in-the-middle-east/.

  • Noorbakhsh F. 1998. Th e Human Development Index: Some Technical Issues and Alternative Indices. Journal of International Development. 10: 589-605.

  • Sarigil Z. 2011. Civil-Military Relations Beyond Dichotomy: With Special Reference to Turkey. Turkish Studies 12(2) 265-278.

  • Schneider F. 2005. Shadow economies around the world: what do we really know? European Journal of Political Economy 21 598-642.

  • Şimşek S. 2013. Conservative Democracy as a Cosmetic Image in Turkish Politics: The Semiology of AKP’s Political Identity. Turkish Studies 14(3) 429-446.

  • SPSS 2007. Statistical Package for the Social Sciences User Guide. Version 14 August 2007.

  • Steenkamp J. -B. E. M. and Geyskens I. 2012. Transaction cost economics and the roles of national culture: A test of hypotheses based on Inglehart and Hofstede. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 40(2) 252-270.

  • Szymański A. 2015. EU Pre-accession Process of Turkey-Determinants and Prospects. Przegląd Politologiczny (1) 7-20.

  • Szymański A. 2016a. Państwo świeckie w Turcji - historyczna i współczesna perspektywa Studia Politologiczne vol. 42 2016 pp 324-346.

  • Szymański A. 2016b. Political Culture of Turkish Elites and Democratic Consolidation. IPSA World Congress of Political Science Poznan available at http://paperroom.ipsa.org/papers/paper_57524.pdf.

  • Tabachnick B. G. and Fidell L. S. 2001. Using multivariate statistics. Needham Heights MA: Allyn & Bacon.

  • Tanzi V. 1999. Uses and abuses of estimates of the underground economy. Economic Journal 109 338-340.

  • Tanzi V. and Schunecht L. 1997. Reconsidering the fi scal role of government: the international perspective. American Economic Review 87 164-168.

  • Tausch A. and Karoui H. 2011. Les Musulmans: Un cauchemar ou une force pour l’Europe? Paris: Harmattan.

  • Tausch A. and Moaddel M. 2009. What 1.3 billion Muslims really think. An answer to a recent Gallup study based on the ‘World Values Survey’. Hauppauge N.Y.: Nova Science Publishers.

  • Tessler M. 2003. Arab and Muslim Political Attitudes: Stereotypes and Evidence from Survey Research. International Studies Perspectives 4 175-80.

  • Toghill J. 2012. Are the official economic and political obstacles to Turkey’s EU accession merely a ‘fig leaf’ covering real unoffi cial cultural and religious reservations? POLIS Journal 6 Winter 2011/2012 pp. 1-39.

  • Torgler B. and Schneider F. 2009. Th e impact of tax morale and institutional quality on the shadow economy. Journal of Economic Psychology 30 228-245.

  • Torgler B. and García-Valinas M. A. 2007. Th e determinants of individuals’ attitudes towards preventing environmental damage. Ecological Economics 63(2-3) 536-552.

  • Torgler B. and Schneider F. 2007. What shapes attitudes toward paying taxes? Evidence from multicultural European countries. Social Science Quarterly 88(2) 443-470.

  • UNDP 2013. Human Development Report 2013. Th e rise of the South: Human progress in a diverse world United Nations Development Program.

  • Wasilewski K. 2017a. Th e “New Turkey” in the Making: What Should the EU’s Strategy Be? Polish Institute for International Aff airs PISM Strategic File no. 2 (86): http://www.pism.pl/Publications/PISM-Strategic-Files/PISM-Strategic-File-no-2-86.

  • Wasilewski K. 2017b. Turkey’s Strategic Culture: Between Republican Tradition and Neo-Ottoman Ambitions. Working Paper Warsaw University https://uw.academia.edu/KarolWasilewski.

  • Wódka J. (2017). Institutional Aspects of the (De-) Europeanization of Turkish Political Parties. Th e Case of the Justice and Development Party (AKP) and the Republican People’s Party (CHP). Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies 19(2) 153-170.

  • Yeşilada B. A. 2002. Th e Virtue Party. Turkish Studies 3(1) 62-81.

  • Yeşilada B. A. and Noordijk P. 2010. Changing Values in Turkey: Religiosity and Tolerance in Comparative Perspective. Turkish Studies 11(1) 9-27.

  • Yilmaz G. 2016. From EU Conditionality to Domestic Choice for Change Exploring Europeanisation of Minority Rights in Turkey. In C. Nas and T. Özer Eds. Turkey and the European Union: Processes of Europeanisation Chapter 6 pp. 119-140 London: Routledge.

Journal information
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 263 109 9
PDF Downloads 172 51 0