Integrated Territorial Investments (ITIs) are a new integration tool that binds the thematic objectives defined operational programmes with the territorial dimension. Due to their formula, ITIs may be seen as a kind of innovation in sub-regional governance. The European Commission considers them as an opportunity to introduce solutions that can be effective in facing the challenges of contemporary development on a supra-local scale. Accordingly, they should be regarded as a possibility for Member States to activate innovative governance arrangements that will allow for the implementation of projects, which - depending on the country - more or less reflect issues indicated by the Commission as a priority. In Poland, the Integrated Territorial Investments are implemented in 24 functional areas. Due to a new approach to cities and their role in development processes in the country, they can mean a new opening for the urban policy and urban development. Concentrating on innovative governance arrangements, the aim of this paper is to analyze selected case studies of 4 ITIs implemented by large (more than 500,000 inhabitants) provincial cities: Wrocław, Łódź, Gdańsk, Katowice, which are capitals of regions in which one defined a different development potential. Th e analysis will allow the formulation of answers to the following research questions: • Are there any innovative governance arrangements indicated during ITIs implementation? • What are the implemented modes of sub-regional governance? • What is the role and importance of institutional actors in the process of ITIs governance? • What are their new competences linked to the ITIs implementation? • Are there any new products/services related to innovation in sub-regional governance? • Do ITIs consider principles of “good governance” a one of key factors of innovation in governance? Th e paper contains key definitions and points out processes related to the transition of modes of governance at the sub-regional level. It also indicates further challenges in Polish territorial development upon Europeanisation.
If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.
Anheier H. Korreck S. (2013) Governance Innovations. Hertie School of Governance. Th e Governance Report 2013. Oxford: Oxford University Press 83-116.
Beach D. Pedersen R.B. (2013). Process-Tracing Methods: Foundations and Guidelines. Michigan: University of Michigan Press.
Collier D. (2011). ‘Understanding Process Tracing’. PS: Political Science and Politics. Vol. 44 No. 4 823-830.
Dane A.V. Schneider B.H. (1998). ‘Program integrity in primary and early secondary prevention: are implementation eff ects out of control?’. Clinical Psychology Review. No. 18 23-45.
Fitzpatrick J. L. Sanders J. R. Worthen B. R. (2011). Program Evaluation: Alternative Approaches and Practical Guidelines. London: Pearson Education.
George A. L. Bennett A. (2005). Case Studies and Th eory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge MA/London: MIT Press.
Klimowicz M. Dudzik L. (2015). Zintegrowane Inwestycje Terytorialne w nowym podejściu do zarządzania miastami w ramach realizacji unijnej polityki spójności. In: A. Wiktorska-Święcka (ed.). (Re)organizacja w zarządzaniu miastami w Polsce w kontekście wyzwań rozwojowych. Wrocław: Ofi cyna Wydawnicza ATUT 107 - 123.
Punton M. Welle K. (2015a). Applying Process Tracing In Five Steps. Practice Paper No.10. April. Institute of Development Studies.
Punton M. Welle K. (2015b). Straws-in-the-wind hoops and smoking guns: What can process tracing off er to impact evaluation?. Practice Paper No.10. April. Institute of Development Studies.
Sale J.E.M. Lohfeld L.H. Brazil K. (2002). ‘Revisiting the quantitative-qualitative debate: Implications for mixed-methods research’. Quality & Quantity. Vol. 36 No.1 43-53.
Van Evera S. (1997). Guide to Methods for Students of Political Science. Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press.
Wiktorska-Święcka A. Michalewska-Pawlak M. Klimowicz M. (2017a). Innowacje we współzarządzaniu rozwojem regionalnym. Praktyka instytucjonalna w wybranych regionach w Polsce. Warszawa: Ofi cyna Wydawnicza ASPRA.
Wiktorska-Święcka A. Michalewska-Pawlak M. Klimowicz M. (2017b). Institutional determinants of innovation in regional governance in Poland. Warszawa: Oficyna Wydawnicz a ASPRA.