Information and Communication Technologies in Electoral Processes: How do they help voters abroad?

Open access

Abstract

The use of information and communication technology in electoral processes has become commonplace, being seen simply as another tool in the hands of policy-makers to improve the quality and effectiveness of public policy and representation. There have been diverse experiences in this area, and the instances in which ICT has been used in the mentioned processes differ. This article analyses and evaluates systematically, for the first time in literature, the incorporation of ICT when voting from abroad, paying attention to the practices of some of those countries that have implemented these technologies in one way or another, into their voting processes. Hence, by introducing the Electronic Voting From Abroad Index, this paper observes at which phase of the process the technology is being used and how this vary from country to country.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Bauböck R. (2005). ‘Expansive Citizenship: Voting beyond Territory and Membership’. Political Science and Politics Vol. 38.

  • Blais A. Labbe-St-Vincent S. Jean-Francois L. Sauger N. & Van Der Straeten K. (2010). ‘Strategic Vote Choice in One-round and Two-round Elections: An Experimental Study’. Political Research Quarterly Vol. 64 pp. 637-645.

  • Brunell T. L. & Clarke H. D. (2010). ‘Who Wants Electoral Competition and Who Wants to Win?’ Political Research Quarterly Vol. 65 pp. 124-137.

  • Caltech MIT. (2001). Voting. What is What it could be. Massachusetts: MIT Press.

  • Castells M. Tubella I. Sancho T. & Roca M. (2007). La transicion a la sociedad red. Barcelona: Ariel.

  • Castells M. (1997). La era de la información. Vol I. La Sociedad red. Madrid: Siglo XXI Editores.

  • Communities E. (2002). eEurope 2005: An information society for all. Brussels: European Commission.

  • Communities E. (2003). The Role of eGovernment for Europe’s Future. Brussels: European Commission.

  • Communities E. (2005). i2010 – Una sociedad de la información europea para el crecimiento y el empleo. Brussels: European Commission.

  • Dahl R. (1963). Modern Political Analysis. E Cliffs New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

  • Dahlberg L. (2001). ‘The Internet and Democratic Discourse. Exploring the Prospects of Online Deliberative Forums extending the Public Sphere’. Information Communication & Society Vol. 4 pp. 615-633.

  • Dalton R. J. (2004). Democratic Challenges democratic choices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • European Commission. (2001). Voting System Standards. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.

  • European Commission. (2002). eEurope 2005: An information society for all. An action plan to be presented in view of the Sevilla European Council. Sevilla. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.

  • Friis C. & Traunmüller R. (2002). Knowledge Management in e-Government. Copenhagen: University of Linz and Roskilde.

  • Gabel M. J. (2013). ‘The Political Consequences of Electoral Laws in the 1990 Hungarian Elections’. Comparative Politics Vol. 27 pp. 205-214.

  • Guy B. & Pierre J. (1998). ‘Governance without government? Rethinking public administration’. Journal of public administration research and theory Vol. 8 pp. 223-244.

  • Held D. (1997). La democracia y el orden global; del estado moderno al gobierno cosmopolita. Madrid: Alianza.

  • Heeks R. (2001). ‘Understanding e-Governance for Development’. i-Government Working Paper Series Vol. 11.

  • IDEA & IFE (2007). Voting from Abroad. Mexico: International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance.

  • Lanvin B. & Cornelius P. K. (2003). The Global Information Technology Report 2002–2003. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Natera A. (2001). El liderazgo politico en la sociedad democratica. Madrid: Centro de Estudios Politicos y Constitucionales.

  • OECD (1999). ‘Public Management and Public Management Service. Impact of the Emerging Information Society’ Policy Department Process and Democratic Quality OECD.

  • Parrado S. (2002). Transition problems to e-administration. First International Conference “European Experience in e-Government Development”. Bulgarian Association of Information and Technologies. Sofia Bulgaria.

  • Przeworski A. (1991). Democracy and the Market: Political and Economic Reforms in Eastern Europe and Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Sartori G. (1962). Democratic Theory. Detroit: Wayne State University Press.

  • Subirats J. et al. (2008). Análisis de Gestión de Políticas Públicas. Barcelona: Ariel Ciencia Política.

  • Trechsel A. H. Méndez F. & Kies R. (2003). ‘The European Parliament and the Challenge of Internet Voting’. Policy Paper Vol. 3 pp. 36-36.

  • United Nations. (2001). Benchmarking e-Government: A Global Perspective. New York: United Nations Publication.

  • United Nations. (2008). UN e-Government survey 2008. New York: United Nations Publications.

  • United Nations. (2005). Global e-Government Readiness Report 2005. From e-Government to e-Inclusion. New York: United Nations Publications.

  • United Nations (2005). Global e-Government Readiness Report 2005 From E-government to E-inclusion. Brussels: United Nations Publications.

  • United Nations. (2008). e-Government Survey 2008. New York: United Nations Publications.

Search
Journal information
Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 220 62 3
PDF Downloads 91 40 1