Mechanisms of Europeanisation and Compliance in Judicial Politics: Understanding the Past and Anticipating the Future

Ramona Coman

Abstract

Recent developments in Hungarian constitutional and judicial politics have given impetus to question not only the outcomes of democratisation and Europeanisation, but also the efficacy of the European Union’s compliance mechanisms. In 2010, Hungary, one of the forerunners in building democracy made the headlines with Fidesz’s attempts at adopting a new Constitution and implementing cardinal laws along with controversial institutional, cultural, religious, moral and socio-economic policies. This article attempts to depict the transformative power of the European Union within a sensitive policy area which touches upon States’ pouvoris régaliens: the independence of the judiciary.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Bodnar, A. & Bojarski, L. (2011) ‘Judicial Independence in Poland’, in Anja Seibert-Fohr (ed.), Judicial Independence in Transition, Springer.

  • Bobek, Michal 2007. ‘Iudex Ex Machina : Institutional and Mental Transitions of Central and Eastern European Judiciairies’, in Coman Ramona and Jean-Michel De Waele (eds.), Judicial Reforms in Central and Eastern European Countries, Brugge: Vanden Broele.

  • Brusis, M. 2005. European Union enlargement and the Europeanization of Eastern Europe: research puzzles and policy issues. In: Z. Mansfeldova, V. Sparschuh and A. Wenninger, eds. Patterns of Europeanization in Central and Eastern Europe, Kramer: Hamburg.

  • Caporaso, J., et al., 2001. Transforming Europe. Europeanization and domestic change. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.

  • Coman, R. And De Waele, J.M. 2007. Judicial reforms in Central and Eastern Europe, from a salient to a salient research topic. In: R. Coman and J.M. De Waele, eds. Judicial Reforms in Central and Eastern European Countries, Buges: Vanden Broele, 1-11.

  • Coman, R. 2009. Reformer la justice dans un pays post-communiste. Le cas de la Roumanie, Bruxelles : Editions de l’Université.

  • Dallara, C. 2007. ‘Challenges to the democratic judicial reform in Serbia: Legacy of the past, political actors interests and the EU vagueness’, in Coman R. & De Waele J.M. (eds). Judicial Reforms in Central and Eastern European Countries, Buges: Vanden Broele.

  • Dallara, C. 2008. ‘Serbia: borderline democracy?’, in Morlino L. & Magen A. (eds) Democratization and the European Union. Comparing Central and Eastern European post-communist countries, New York : Routledge.

  • Domingo, P. 1999. Judicial Independence and Judicial Reforms in Latin America. In: A. Schedler, L. Diamond and M. F. Plattner, eds. The Self-Restraining State. Power and Accountability in New Democracies. Lynne Rienner Publishers: London, 151-177.

  • Febbrajo, A. 2010. Legal Cultures in Transition: A System-theory Approach. In: A. Febbrajo and W. Sadurski, eds. Central and Eastern Europe After Transition. Towards a New Socio-legal Semantics, Ashgate, 35-73.

  • Fleck, Z. et al, Opinion on the fundamental law of Hungary, June 2011.

  • Fleck, Zoltan 2011. ‘Judicial Independence in Hungary’, in Seibert-Fohr Anja (ed.), Judicial Independence in Transition, Springer.

  • Friedman, B. 2004. History, Politics and Judicial Independence. In: S. Andras, ed. Judicial Integrity, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers: Leiden, Boston.

  • Elster, J. 1995. Forces and Mechanisms in the Constitution-Making Process, Duke Law Journal, 45 (2), 364-396.

  • Epstein, R. A., 2005. ‘The paradoxes of enlargement’, European Political Research, Vol. 4, pp. 384-394.

  • European Parliament, Resolution of 10 March 2011 on Media law in Hungary.

  • European Parliament, debates, 17 January 2011.

  • European Commission for Democracy through Law, Opinion on the new Constitution of Hungary, no° 621/2011.

  • European Commission, Press Release, 7 March 2012.

  • European Commission, 1998. Regular report from the Commission on Hungary progress towards Accession.

  • European Commission, 1999. Regular report from the Commission on Hungary progress towards Accession.

  • European Commission, 2001. Regular report from the Commission on Hungary progress towards Accession, SEC(2001) 1748.

  • European Commission, 2002. Regular report from the Commission on Hungary progress towards Accession, SEC(2002) 1404.

  • European Commission, 2003. Comprehensive monitoring report on Hungary’s preparations for membership.

  • EU Observer, MEPs voice ‘serious concern’ on Hungary’s democracy, 16 February 2012.

  • EU Observer, EU gives Hungary one month to fix laws, 7 March 2012.

  • Exadaktylos, T. and Radaelli, C. 2009. Research Design in European Studies: The Case of Europeanization, JCMS, 47 (3), 507-530.

  • Ginsburg, Nuno and Garpupa, Tom 2009. “Guarding the Guardians. Judicial Councils and Judicial Independence”, American Journal of Comparative Law, 57, 201-232.

  • Grabbe, H. 2001. How does Europeanization affect CEE governance? Conditionality, diffusion and diversity. Journal of European Public Policy, 8 (6), 1013-1031.

  • Grabbe, H. 2002. European Union Conditionality and the Acquis communautaire. International Political Science Review, 23 (3), 249-268.

  • Goetz, K. 2001. Making sense of post-communist central administration: modernization, Europeanization or Latinization?. Journal of European Public Policy, 8 (6), 1032-1051.

  • Bankuti, M., Halmai G. Scheppele, K. L. 2012. Hungary’s Illiberal Turn. Disabling the Constitution, Journal of Democracy, 23 (3), 138-146.

  • Hammerslev, O. 2011. “The European Union and the United States in Eastern Europe: two ways of exporting law, expertise and state power”, in Y. Dezalay Y. & B. G. Garth (eds), Bryant Lawyers and the Rule of Law in an Era of Globalization, Routledge.

  • Haughton, T. 2007. When Does the EU Make a Difference? Conditionality and the Accession Process in Central and Eastern Europe. Political Studies Review, 5 (2), 233-246.

  • Hill, P., Knill, Ch., 2006. ‘It’s the Bureaucracy Stupid. The Implementation of the Acquis Communautaire in the EU Candidate Countries, 1999-2003’, European Union Politics, 7, 4.

  • Hughes, J., Sasse, G., Gordon, C. 2004a. Conditionality and Compliance in the EU’s Eastward Enlargement: Regional Policy and the Reform of Sub-national Government. Journal of Common Market Studies, 42 (3), 523-551.

  • Hughes, J., Sasse, G., Gordon, C. 2004b. Europeanization and regionalization in the EU’s enlargement to Central and Eastern Europe: the myth of conditionality, Basingstoke: Palgrave.

  • Juncos, A. 2011. Europeanization by Decree? The case of Police Reform in Bosnia. JCMS, 49 (2), 367-389.

  • Kotzian, P., Knodt, M. and Urdze, S., Instruments of the EU’s external democracy promotion, JCMS, 49 (5), 923-1152.

  • Kochenov, D. 2004. Behind the Copenhagen façade. The meaning and the structure of the Copenhagen Political Criterion of democracy and the rule of law. European Integration online Papers, 8 (10), 1-36.

  • Kosar, D. 2010. ‘Judicial Accountability in the (Post)Transitional Context: A Story of the Czech Republic’, in Czarnota A. & Parmentier S. (eds) (2010).

  • Ladrech, R. 2010. Europeanization and National Politics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Larkins, K. 1996. Judicial Independence and Democratization: A Theoretical and Conceptual Analysis. The American Journal of Comparative Law, 44 (4), 605-626.

  • Magalhaes, P. C. 1999. The Politics of Judicial Reform in Eastern Europe. Comparative Politics, 32 (1), 43-62.

  • Melone, A. P. 1996. The Struggle for Judicial Independence and the Transition toward Democracy in Bulgaria. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 29 (2), 231-243.

  • Muller, J. W. 2013. Defending Democracy within the EU, Journal of Democracy, 24(2), 138-149.

  • O’Dwyer, C. 2006. Reforming Regional Governance in East Central Europe: Europeanization or Domestic Politics as usual. East European Politics and Societies, 20(2), 219-253.

  • Open Society Institute 2001. Monitoring the EU Accession Process: Judicial Independence, Budapest.

  • Parau, C. 2011. “The Drive for Judicial Supremacy”, in Anja Seibert-Fohr (ed.), Judicial Independence in Transition, Springer.

  • Papadimitriou, D. and Phinnemore, D. 2004. Europeanization, Conditionality and Domestic Change: The Twinning Exercice and Administrative Reform in Romania. Journal of Common Market Studies, 42 (3), 619-639.

  • Pederzoli, P. And Piana, D. 2010. The Governance of the Judicial System in Europe. In: R. Coman and C. Dallara, eds. Handbook on Judicial Politics, Iasi: Institutul European, 89-121.

  • Piana, D. 2010. Judicial Accountabilities in New Europe. From Rule of Law to Quality of Justice. Ashgate.

  • Přibáň, J. 2004. Reconstituting Paradise Lost: Temporality, Civility, and Ethnicity in Post-CommunistConstitution-Making. Law & Society Review, 38 (3), 407-432.

  • Přibáň, J. 2010. Constituting the Heterarchy of European Constitutionalism in the EU’s New Member States. In: In: A. Febbrajo and W. Sadurski, eds. Central and Eastern Europe After Transition. Towards a New Socio-legal Semantics, Ashgate, 13-35.

  • Pridham, G. 2006. Assessing Democratic Consolidation in Central and Eastern Europe: The European Dimension. Acta Politica, 41, 342-369.

  • Pogany, I. 1993. Constitutional Reform in Central and Eastern Europe: Hungary’s Transition to Democracy. The International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 42 (2), 332-355.

  • Ravinet, P. 2011. ‚La coordination européenne «à la bolognaise»‘ Revue française de science politique, 61, 1.

  • Richardson, J. T. 2006. Religion, Constitutional Courts, and Democracy in Former Communist Countries. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 603, 129-138.

  • Saurugger, S. (2012) “Beyond Non-Compliance with Legal Norms”, in Exadaktylos, T. and Radaelli, C. M. (eds). Research Design in European Studies. Establishing Causality in Europeanization, New York: Palgrave.

  • Sajo, A. 1995. Reading the Invisible Constitution: Judicial Review in Hungary. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 15 (2), 253-267.

  • Sadurski, W. 2008. Solange, chapter 3’: Constitutional Courts in Central Europe—Democracy European Union. European Law Journal, 14 (1), 1-35.

  • Schedler, A. 1999. Retraining the State: Conflicts and Agents of Accountabiity. In: A. Schedler, L. Diamond and M. F. Plattner, eds. The Self-Restraining State. Power and Accountability in New Democracies. Lynne Rienner Publishers: London, 333-351.

  • Scheppele, K. L. 2006. Guardians of the Constitution: Constitutional Court Presidents and the Struggle for the Ruleof Law in Post-Soviet Europe. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 154 (6), 1757-1851.

  • Schimmelfennig, F., Engert, S. and Knobel, H. 2003. Costs, Commitment and COmpliance : The Impact of EU Democratic Conditionality on Latvia, Slovakia and Turkey. Journal of Common Market Studies, 41 (3), 495–518.

  • Schimmelfennig, F. and Sedelmeier, U. 2004. Governance by conditionality : EU rule transfer to the candidate countries of Central and Eastern Europe. Journal of European Public Policy, 11 (4), 661–679.

  • Schönfelder, Bruno (2005). “Judicial Independence in Bulgaria: A Tale of Splendour and Misery”, Europe-Asia Studies, 57: 1, 61-92.

  • Schwartz, H. 1999. Surprising Success: The New Eastern European Constitutional Courts. In: A. Schedler, L. Diamond and M. F. Plattner, eds. The Self-Restraining State. Power and Accountability in New Democracies. Lynne Rienner Publishers: London, 195-217.

  • Seleny, A. 1999. Old Political Rationalities and New Democracies: Compromise and Confrontation in Hungary and Poland. World Politics, 51, 484-519.

  • Sticka, M. (2007) ‘Top-down control slows Czech judicial reform, despite EU impetus’ in Transparency International

  • Spinner, M. 2005. Aspects of democracy. Democratic consolidation in Eastern Europe: old wine in new bottles?. European Political Science, 4, 443-453.

  • Uitz, R. 2010. Hungary : high hopes revisited. In : L. Morlino and W. Sadurski, (eds) Democratization and the European Union. Comparing Central and Eastern European post-communist countries, New York : Routledge, 45-71.

  • Wuller, J.W. 2013. Defending Democracy within the EU, Journal of Democracy, 24 (2), 2013, 138-149.

  • Wolczuk, K. 2007. Constitutional Politics. In: S. White, J. Batt and Paul G. Lewis, eds. Developments in Central and East European Politics, Palgrave.

OPEN ACCESS

Journal + Issues

Search