This paper tries to shed some light on factors influencing the positions of the new member states of the EU on Eastern Partnership in its initial phase. It utilises an analytical approach developed by Copsey and Haughton (2009) and argues that the two most important factors affecting positioning of newcomers towards the initiative are: perceived size and geography. While the new members were especially keen to support their immediate neighbours, they were using a common policy towards these countries to increase their presence and influence in the region since the initiative helped them to deal with neighbourhood issues they were not able to solve on their own. The paper suggests an amendment to the theoretical approach and proposes an assumption explaining positioning of the member states towards the third countries that better reflect the empirical evidence than the original framework. Moreover, the research showed that Poland differed from the rest of the new EU countries, was much more active and influential and rather resembled the old members. However, due to its not very positive image (caused by its assertive approach and strong effort to play a prominent role within the EU) its influence within the EU was limited and, therefore it proposed the Eastern Partnership together with Sweden that held a much better image.
If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.
Christou George. European Union security logics to the east: the European Neighbourhood Policy and the Eastern Partnership. European Security 2010 vol. 19 vo. 3 pp. 413-430.
Copsey Nathaniel and Haughton Tim. Choices for Europe: National Preferences in Old and New Member States. Journal of Common Market Studies 2009 vol. 47 no.2 pp. 263-286.
Copsey Nathaniel and Pomorska Karolina. Poland’s power and influence in the European Union. Comparative European Politics 2010 vol. 8 no. 3 p. 304-26.
Iangbein Julia and Börzel Tanja A. Introduction: Explaining Policy Change in the European Union‘s Eastern Neighbourhood. Europe-Asia Studies 2013 vol. 65 no. 4 pp. 571-580.
Korosteleva Elena. The European Union and its Eastern Neighbours. Towards a more ambitious partnership? London: Routlege 2009.
Kostanyan Hrant and Orbie Jan. The EEAS’ discretionary power within the Eastern Partnership: in search of the highest possible denominator. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 2012 vol. 13 no.1 pp. 47-65.
Kratochvíl Petr and Tulmets Elsa. Constructivism and rationalism in EU external relations: the case of the European neighbourhood policy. Baden-Baden: Nomos 2010.
Král David Bartovic Vladimír a Riháčková Věra. The 2009 Czech EU Presidency: Contested Leadership at a Time of Crisis. Stockholm: Sieps 2009.
Láštic Erik. Five Years After: New Member States in the European Union. Slovak Sociological Review 2010 vol. 42 no. 1 pp. 33-53.
Malová Darina Rybář Marek Bilčík Vladimír Láštic Erik Lisoňová Zuzana Mišík Matúš and Pašiak Martin. From Listening to Action? New Member States in the European Union. Bratislava. Bratislava: Devín Press 2010.
Marušiak Juraj. Slovensko a východné partnerstvo. Bratislava: Výskumné centrum Slovenskej spoločnosti pre zahraničnú politiku 2010. Ročenka zahraničnej politiky Slovenskej republiky.
Mišík Matúš. The Influence of Perception on the Preferences of the New Member States of the European Union: The Case of Energy Policy. Comparative European Politics (forthcoming).
Petrova Tsveta. How Poland Promotes Democracy. Journal of Democracy 2012 vol. 23 no. 2 pp. 133-147.
Turkina Ekaterina and Postnikov Evgeny. Cross-border Inter-firm Networks in the European Union‘s Eastern Neighbourhood: Integration via Organizational Learning. Journal of Common Market Studies 2012 vol. 50 no. 4 pp. 632-652.
Wojna Beata and Gniazdowski Mateusz. Eastern Partnership: The Opening Report. Warsaw: The Polish Institute of International Affairs 2009.