How do Members of Parliament View the Public Value of Public Service Media? The Case of Latvia

Open access


The Development of public media in Latvia as a post-communist country has essentially been influenced by politicians. The political community has had consensus that certain reforms are necessary to ensure the development of public media given the changes in the communication space and its role in the facilitation of the strengthening of democracy, yet during the last fifteen years the political elite has not been able to come to a common agreement and to make decisions on systemic reforming and the development of public media. Since the communication environment has changed post digitalisation of television, the question about public media development and legitimisation has become increasingly topical.

The aim of the study is to explore how the members of the parliament of Latvia (Saeima) position public service media (PSM) in Latvia and assess the public value of PSM. The theoretical framework for the research is based on the concept of public value „strategic triangle” (Benington & Moore 2011), which consists of three main elements: public value outcomes, the authorising environment and operational capacity.

The study is based on qualitative research methods including 18 semi-structured interviews conducted with members of the Saeima in 2012 and 2013. The acquired data has been analysed by the principles of thematic analysis (Attride-Stirling 2001). Analysis of the interviews show that members of the Saeima recognise the need for public media to be independent whilst at the same time supporting a model in which public media is not supposed to have independent funding and they will continue competing with commercial media in the advertising market. High competition and resentment are characteristic features of the political elite in Latvia that apparently would also in future hamper the making of such decisions about public media that will facilitate their high-quality. Results of the research show the tendency for members of parliament to lack the necessary knowledge to formulate their opinion and to modulate relations of public media with society and their place in the overall media system in Latvia.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Aalberg Toril van Aelst Peter Curran James. Media Systems and the Political Information Environment: A Cross–National Comparison. The International Journal of Press/Politics 2010 vol. 15(3) 255–271.

  • Alford John O‘Flynn Janine. Making Sense of Public Value: Concepts Critiques and Emergent Meanings. International Journal of Public Administration 2009 no. 32 (3-4) pp. 171–191.

  • Attride-Stirling Jennifer. Thematic Networks: An Analytic Tool for Qualitative Research. Qualitative Research 2001 vol. 1 no. 3 pp. 385–405. 27

  • BBC. Building Public Value. Renewing the BBC for Digital World[online]. London: BBC 2004. [Accessed on 5th May 2013]. Available online:

  • Benington John. Creating the Public in Order to Create Public Value? International Journal of Public Administration 2009 vol. 32(3-4) 232–249.

  • Benington John Moore Mark. Public Value: Theory and Practice. 1st Edition. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan 2011. Public Value in Complex and Changing Times pp. 1–25.

  • Collins Richard. The BBC and “Public Value”. Medien und Kommunikationswissenschaft 2007 vol. 65 no. 2 164–184.

  • Coyle Diane Woolard Christopher. Public Value in Practice Restoring the Ethos of Public Service. London: BBC Trust 2010. [Accessed on 5th May 2013]. Available online:

  • Jakubowicz Karol Sükösd M Miklós. (eds) Finding the Right Place on the Map. Central and Eastern European Media Change in a Global Perspective. Bristol Chicago: Intellect Books 2008.

  • Kelly Gavin Mulgan Geoff Muers Stephen. Creating Public Value. An Analytical Framework for Public Service Reform [online]. London: Minister’s Strategy Unit Cabinet Office 2002.[Accessed on 5th May 2013]. Available online:

  • Moore Mark. Creating Public Value – Strategic Management in Government. Cambridge: Harvard University Press 1995.

  • Moore Mark. Managing for Value: Organizational Strategy in For-profit Nonprofit and Governmental Organization. Non-profit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 2000 vol. 29 no. 1 pp. 183–204.

  • Raboy Marc Proulx Serge Dahlgren Peter. The Dilemma of Social Demand. Shaping Media Policy in New Civic Contexts. The International Journal for Communication Studies 2003 vol 65 no. 4-5 323–329.

Journal information
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 157 55 2
PDF Downloads 85 48 2