Traumatic brain injuries to the frontal lobes are associated with many maladaptive forms of behavior. We investigated the association between brain damage and impulsivity, as measured by the rate of delay discounting (i.e., the extent to which future outcomes are devalued in time). The main aim of this study was to test the hypothesis of steeper discounting of different amounts in a group of patients with frontal lobe damage. We used a delay discounting task in the form of a structured interview. A total of 117 participants were divided into five groups: three neurological groups and two groups without brain damage. Our analyses showed that patients with focal damage to the frontal lobes demonstrated steeper delay discounting than other participants. Other clinical groups demonstrated similar discounting rates. The data pattern related to the magnitude effect on the group level suggested that the magnitude effect is absent in the group of patients with damage to the frontal lobes; however, results were less consistent on an individual level. Amount-dependent discounting was observed in only two groups, the healthy control group and the neurological group with other cortical areas damaged.
Bechara, A., Tranel, D., & Damasio, H. (2000). Characterization of the decision-making defi cit of patients with ventromedial prefrontal cortex lesions. Brain, 123(11), 2189-2202.
Belin-Rauscent, A., Daniel, M.L., Puaud, M., Jupp, B., Sawiak, S., Howett, D., ... & Everitt, B.J. (2016). From impulses to maladaptive actions: the insula is a neurobiological gate for the development of compulsive behavior. Molecular psychiatry, 21(4), 491-499.
Berlin, H.A., Rolls, E.T., & Kischka, U. (2004). Impulsivity, time perception, emotion and reinforcement sensitivity in patients with orbitofrontal cortex lesions. Brain, 127(5), 1108-1126.
Białaszek, W., Gaik, M., McGoun, E., & Zielonka, P. (2015) Impulsive people have a compulsion for immediate gratifi cation-certain or uncertain. Front. Psychol. 6:515. doi:
Bickel, W.K., Johnson, M.W., Koffarnus, M.N., MacKillop, J., & Murphy, J.G. (2014). The behavioral economics of substance use disorders: reinforcement pathologies and their repair. Annual review of clinical psychology, 10, 641-677.
Bickel, W.K., Miller, M.L., Yi, R., Kowal, B.P., Lindquist, D.M., & Pitcock, J.A. (2007). Behavioral and neuroeconomics of drug addiction: Competing neural systems and temporal discounting processes. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 90, 85-91.
Borges, A.M., Kuang, J., Milhorn, H., & Yi, R. (2016). An alternative approach to calculating Area-Under-the-Curve (AUC) in delay discounting research. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 106(2), 145-155.
Cardinal, R.N. (2006). Neural systems implicated in delayed and probabilistic reinforcement. Neural Networks, 19(8), 1277-1301.
Cardinal, R.N., Winstanley, C.A., Robbins, T.W., & Everitt, B.J. (2004). Limbic corticostriatal systems and delayed reinforcement. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1021(1), 33-50.
Goodglass, H., & Kaplan, E. (Eds.) (1983). The Assessment of Aphasia and Related Disorders, 2nd edn. Philadelphia, PA: Lea & Febiger.
Green, L., Myerson, J., Holt, D.D., Slevin, J.R., & Estle, S.J. (2004). Discounting of delayed food rewards in pigeons and rats: is there a magnitude effect?. Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 81(1), 39-50.
Green, L., Myerson, J., Oliveira, L., & Chang, S.E. (2013). Delay discounting of monetary rewards over a wide range of amounts. Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 100(3), 269-281.
Green, L., Myerson, J., & Ostaszewski, P. (1999). Amount of reward has opposite effects on the discounting of delayed and probabilistic outcomes. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition, 25, 418-427.
Green, L., Myerson, J., Lichtman, D., Rosen, S., & Fry, A. (1996). Temporal discounting in choice between delayed rewards: the role of age and income. Psychology and aging, 11(1), 79.
Johnson, M.W., Johnson, P.S., Herrmann, E.S., & Sweeney, M.M. (2015). Delay and probability discounting of sexual and monetary outcomes in individuals with cocaine use disorders and matched controls. PLoS One, 10(5), e0128641.
Jones, L.V. (1952). Tests of hypotheses: One-sided vs. two-sided alternatives. Psychological Bulletin, 49, 43-46.
Jones, L.V. (1954). A rejoinder on one-tailed tests. Psychological Bulletin, 51, 585-586.
Kennerley, S.W. & Walton, M.E. (2011). Decision making and reward in frontal cortex: complementary evidence from neurophysiological and neuropsychological studies, Behavioral Neuroscience, 125(3), 297-317.
Kimmel, H.D. (1957). Three criteria for the use of one-tailed tests. Psychological Bulletin, 54, 351-353.
Klein-Flügge, M.C., Kennerley, S.W., Saraiva, A.C., Penny, W.D., & Bestmann, S. (2015). Behavioral modeling of human choices reveals dissociable effects of physical effort and temporal delay on reward devaluation. PLoS Comput Biol, 11(3), e1004116.
Logue, A.W. (1988). Research on self-control: An integrating framework. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 11(04), 665-679.
Mar, A.C., Walker, A.L., Theobald, D.E., Eagle, D.M., & Robbins, T.W. (2011). Dissociable effects of lesions to orbitofrontal cortex subregions on impulsive choice in the rat. Journal of Neuroscience, 31(17), 6398-6404.
Massar, S.A., Libedinsky, C., Weiyan, C., Huettel, S.A., & Chee, M.W. (2015). Separate and overlapping brain areas encode subjective value during delay and effort discounting. NeuroImage, 120, 104-113.
McClure, S.M., Laibson, D.I., Loewenstein, G., & Cohen, J.D. (2004). Separate neural systems value immediate and delayed monetary rewards. Science, 306(5695), 503-507.
McHugh, L. & Wood, R.L. (2008). Using a temporal discounting paradigm to measure decision-making and impulsivity following traumatic brain injury: A pilot study. Brain Injury, 22(9), 715-721.
Mellis, A.M., Woodford, A.E., Stein, J.S., & Bickel, W.K. (2017). A second type of magnitude effect: Reinforcer magnitude differentiates delay discounting between substance users and controls. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 107(1), 151-160.
Menon, V., & Uddin, L.Q. (2010). Saliency, switching, attention and control: a network model of insula function. Brain Structure & Function, 214(5-6), 655-667.
Mitchell, S.H. (1999). Measures of impulsivity in cigarette smokers and non-smokers. Psychopharmacology, 146(4), 455-464.
Mitchell, S.H. (2004). Effects of short-term nicotine deprivation on decision- making: Delay, uncertainty and effort discounting. Nicotine and Tobacco Research, 6, 819-828.
Mohammadi, B., Hammer, A., Miedl S.F., Wiswede, D., Marco-Pallarés, J., Herrmann, M. & Münte, T.F. (2016). Intertemporal choice behavior is constrained by brain structure in healthy participants and pathological gamblers. Brain Structure & Function, 221(6), 3157-3170.
Nishiyama, R. (2016). Physical, emotional, and cognitive effort discounting in gain and loss situations. Behavioural processes, 125, 72-75.
Ostaszewski, P., Bąbel, P., & Swebodziński, B. (2013). Physical and cognitive effort discounting of hypothetical monetary rewards. Japanese Psychological Research, 55(4), 329-337.
Peters, J., & Büchel, C. (2009). Overlapping and distinct neural systems code for subjective value during intertemporal and risky decision making. Journal of Neuroscience, 29(50), 15727-15734.
Peters, J., & D’Esposito, M. (2016). Effects of medial orbitofrontal cortex lesions on self-control in intertemporal choice. Current Biology, 26(19), 2625-2628.
Reynolds, B. (2006). A review of delay-discounting research with humans: relations to drug use and gambling. Behavioural pharmacology, 17(8), 651-667.
Sellitto, M., Ciaramelli, E., & di Pellegrino, G. (2010). Myopic discounting of future rewards after medial orbitofrontal damage in humans. The Journal of Neuroscience, 30(49), 16429-16436.
Sener, M.T., Ozcan, H., Sahingoz, S., & Ogul, H. (2015). Criminal responsibility of the frontal lobe syndrome. The Eurasian Journal of Medicine, 47, 218-222.
Sheffer, C., MacKillop, J., McGeary, J., Landes, R., Carter, L., Yi, R., ... & Bickel, W. (2012). Delay discounting, locus of control, and cognitive impulsiveness independently predict tobacco dependence treatment outcomes in a highly dependent, lower socioeconomic group of smokers. The American Journal on Addictions, 21(3), 221-232.