The meaning of the body schema in reaching maturity during late adolescence

Open access

Abstract

The objective of the research presented in this paper was to investigate whether an association existed between the activation of the body schema and reaching adulthood among people in late adolescence. Three activities that are known to enjoy popularity among young people were analysed, namely: dancing, playing computer games that require motor involvement (e.g. Kinect), and playing computer games of an educational and entertaining character. It was assumed that the chosen forms of activity correspond to three levels of activation of the body schema. The following research methods have been applied to this study: the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (SES), the Defence Style Questionnaire (DSQ), and the Bodily Self Representation Questionnaire. The study has proven that the activation of body schema through dance is significantly related to high self-esteem and the use of mainly mature and neurotic defence mechanisms in threat situations.

Altınta, A., Kin-İşler, A., Güven-Karahan, B., Kelecek, S., Özkan, A., Yılmaz, A., & Kara, F. M. (2014). The role of physical activity, body mass index and maturity status in body-related perceptions and self-esteem of adolescents. Annals of Human Biology, 41, 5, 395-402.

Andrews, G., Singh, M., & Bond, M. (1993). The Defence Style Questionnaire. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 181, 246-256.

Bandura, A., Pastorelli, C., Barbaranelli, C., & Caprara, G. V. (1999). Self-efficacy pathways to childhood depression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 258-269.

Bogutyn, T. (1995). Aleksytymia i funkcjonowanie obronne ego. Unpublished MA dissertation. Kraków: Uniwersytet Jagieloński.

Cash, T. F., & Deagle, E. A. (1997). The nature and extent of body-image disturbances in anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa: A meta-analysis. Journal of Eating Disorders, 22, 107-125.

Clay, D., Vignoles, V. L., & Dittmar, H. (2005). Body image and self-esteem among adolescent girls: Testing the influence of sociocultural factors. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 15, 4, 451-477.

Davidson, K., & MacGregor, M. W. (1998). A critical appraisal of self-report defence mechanism measures. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 5, 23-36.

Eisenberg, M. E., Neumark-Sztainer, D., & Paxton, S. (2006). Five-year change in body satisfaction among adolescents. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 61, 521-527.

Gallagher, S. (2005). Dynamic models of body schematic processes. [in:] H. Preester, V. Knockaert (ed.), Body Image and Body Schema: Interdisciplinary perspectives on the body (pp. 233-250). Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Gallese, V., & Sinigaglia, C. (2010). The body self as power for action. Neuropsychologia, 48, 746-755.

Harter, S. (1990). Causes, correlates and functional role of global self worth: A life span perspective. In Kollgian, J., & Sternberg, R. (Eds.). Perceptions of Competence and Incompetence across Life Span. New Haven: Yale University Press, 67-98.

Hazel, M., & Nurius, P. (1986). Possible selves. American Psychologist, 41, 954-969.

Huang, J., Norman, G., Zabinski, M., Caifas, K., & Patrick, K. (2007). Body image and self-esteem among adolescents undergoing an intervention targeting dietary and physical activity behaviors. Journal of Adolescent Health, 40, 245-251.

Jacob, P., & Jeannerod, M. (2005). The motor theory on social cognition: a critique. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 1, 21-25.

Kamps, C. L., & Berman, S. L. (2011). Body image and identity formation: The role of identity distress. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 43, 2, 267-277.

Knauss, S., Paxton, S. J., & Alsaker, F. D. (2008). Body dissatisfaction in adolescent boys and girls: Objectified body consciousness, internalization of the media body ideal and perceived pressure from media. Sex Roles, 59, 633-643.

Kokoszka, A. (1997). Integrujący model stanów psychicznych. Kraków: CM UJ.

Krueger, D. W. (2002). Integrating body self and psychological self. New York - London: Brunner-Routlegde.

Legrand, D. (2006). The bodily self: The sensori-motor roots of pre-reflective self-consciousness. Phenomenology and Cognitive Sciences, 5, 89-118.

Markey, C. N. (2010). Invited commentary: Why body image is important to adolescent development. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 39, 1387-1391.

Mirucka, B. (2013). Exploring the relationship between the body self and personality defence mechanisms in women with bulimia nervosa. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 44, 1, 118-126.

Mirucka, B., & Sakson-Obada, O. (2012). Ja cielesne - od normy do zaburzeń. Sopot: GWP.

Mirucka, B. (unpublished). Bateria Testów do Badania Reprezentacji Ja Cielesnego.

Lachowicz-Tabaczek, K., & Śniecińska, J. (2008). Intrapsychiczne źródła samooceny: znaczenie emocji, temperamentu i poczucia zdolności do działania. Czasopismo Psychologiczne, 2, 229-246.

Łaguna, M., Lachowicz-Tabaczek, K., & Dzwonkowska, I. (2007). Skala samooceny SES Morrisa Rosenberga - polska adaptacja metody. Psychologia Społeczna, 2, 02 (04), 164-176.

Oleś, P. K. (2008). O różnych rodzajach tożsamości oraz ich stałości i zmianie. In P. K. Oleś, A. Batory (ed.). Tożsamość i jej przemiany a kultura (pp. 41-84). Lublin: Wydawnictwo KUL.

Orth, U., Maes, J., & Schmitt, M. (2015). Self-esteem development across the life span: A longitudinal study with large sample from Germany. Development Psychology, 51, 2, 248-259.

Orth, U., & Robins, R. W. (2014). The development of self-esteem. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23, 5, 381-387.

Bond, M., & Perry, J. C. (2004). Long-term changes in defense style with psychodynamic psychotherapy for depressive, anxiety and personality disorders. American Journal of Psychiatry, 161, 1665-1671.

Presnell, K., Bearman, S. K., & Stice, E. (2004). Risk factors for body dissatisfaction in adolescent boys and girls: A prospective study. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 36, 389-401.

Rosen, J. C., Reiter, J., & Orosan, P. (1995). Assesment of body image in eating disorders with the body dysmorphic disorder examination. Behaviour Research and Psychotherapy, 1, 77-84.

Rossetti, Y., Rode, G., Farne, A., & Rossetti, A. (2005). Implicit body representations in action. In: H. Preester, V. Knockaert (ed.), Body Image and Body Schema: Interdisciplinary perspectives on the body (pp. 111-125). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Seligman, M., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology: an introduction. American Psychologist, 55, 5-14.

Sękowski, A., & Jakubiec, B. (2007). Obraz ciała u tancerzy. In P. Francuz, W. Otrębski (ed.). Studia Psychologiczne w KUL, 14, 102-119.

Smolak, L. (2004). Body image in children and adolescents: Where do we go from here? Body Image, 1, 15-28.

Stamenov, M. (2005). Body schema, body image, and mirror neurons. In H. Preester, V. Knockaert (ed.), Body Image and Body Schema: Interdisciplinary perspectives on the body (pp. 21-43). Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Swami, V., & Tovee, M. J. (2009). A comparison of actual-ideal weight discrepancy, body appreciation, and media influence between street-dancers. Body Image, 6, 304-307.

Tsakiris, M., & Haggard, P. (2006). Having a body versus moving your body: How agency structures body-ownership. Consciousness and Cognition, 15, 2, 423-432.

Tsakiris, M., Schutz-Bosbach, S., & Gallagher, S. (2007). On agency and body-ownership: Phenomenological and neurocognitive reflections. Consciousness and Cognition, 16, 645-660.

Vaillant, G. E. (2000). Adaptive mental mechanisms. American Psychologist, 55, 89-98.

De Vignemont, F. (2011). A self for the body. Metaphilosophy, 42, 3, 230-247.

Vignoles, V. L., Regalia, C., Manzi, C., Golledge, J., & Scabini, E. (2006). Beyond Self-Esteem: Influence of Multiple Motives on Identity Construction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 2, 308-333.

Polish Psychological Bulletin

The Journal of Committee for Psychological Sciences of Polish Academy of Sciences

Journal Information


CiteScore 2016: 0.33

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.185
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.258

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 155 155 19
PDF Downloads 61 61 8