Cognitive effects of attentional training depend on attentional control

Open access

Abstract

Attentional bias is assumed to be partly responsible for the onset and maintenance of anxiety by major cognitive theories of emotional disorders. Although much is already known about the therapeutic effects of attentional bias training, only a few studies have examined the mechanism responsible for these effects. In order to test if low-level, cognitive effects of attentional bias training depend on attentional control, 73 participants, who completed the STAI-x2 and the ACS questionnaires, were randomly assigned to a control (n = 37) or attentional training group (n = 36). The attentional manipulation was followed by a search task, during which novel neutral or negative faces could be presented within an array of all-neutral, all-negative or all-positive faces. It was found that individuals with higher ACS score displayed stronger attentional training effects, i.e., they were less accurate in detecting distinctive negative faces, and this effect was not found to be associated with STAI-x2 score. These results show that there is individual variability even in immediate, cognitive effects of attentional bias modification and that special abilities, such as attentional control, might be required for attentional training to be efficient.

Amir, N, Bomyea, J., & Beard, C. (2010). The effect of single-session interpretation modification on attention bias in socially anxious individuals. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 24, 178-182.

Amir, Nader, Beard, C., Burns, M., & Bomyea, J. (2009). Attention modification program in individuals with generalized anxiety disorder. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 118, 28-33.

Baert, S., De Raedt, R., Schacht, R., & Koster, E. H. W. (2010). Attentional bias training in depression: Therapeutic effects depend on depression severity. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 41, 265-274.

Bar-Haim, Y. (2010). Research Review: attention bias modification (ABM): a novel treatment for anxiety disorders. Journal of ChildPsychology and Psychiatry, 51, 859-870.

Bar-Haim, Y., Lamy, D., Pergamin, L., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., & van IJzendoorn, M. H. (2007). Threat-related attentional bias in anxious and nonanxious individuals: A meta-analytic study. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 1-24.

Browning, M., Holmes, E. A., Murphy, S. E., Goodwin, G. M., & Harmer, C. J. (2010). Lateral prefrontal cortex mediates the cognitive modification of attentional bias. Biological Psychiatry, 67(10), 919-25.

Chan, R. C. K., Shum, D., Toulopoulou, T., & Chen, E. Y. H. (2008). Assessment of executive functions: review of instruments and identification of critical issues. Archives of clinical neuropsychology:the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists, 23, 201-16.

Cisler, J. M., & Koster, E. H. W. (2010). Mechanisms of attentional biases towards threat in anxiety disorders: An integrative review. ClinicalPsychology Review, 30, 203-216.

Clark, D. A., Beck, A. T., & Alford, B. A. (1999). Scientific Foundationsof Cognitive Theory and Therapy of Depression. New York: John Wiley.

Derryberry, D., & Reed, M. A. (2002). Anxiety-related attentional biases and their regulation by attentional control. Journal of AbnormalPsychology, 111, 225-236.

Duncan, J., & Humphreys, G. W. (1989). Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psychological Review, 96, 433-58.

Eysenck, M. W., Derakshan, N., Santos, R., & Calvo, M. G. (2007). Anxiety and cognitive performance: attentional control theory. Emotion, 7, 336-53.

Fajkowska, M., & Derryberry, D. (2010). Psychometric properties of Attentional Control Scale: The preliminary study on a Polish sample. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 41, 1-7.

Hakamata, Y., Lissek, S., Bar-Haim, Y., Britton, J. C., Fox, N. A., Leibenluft, E., Ernst, M., et al. (2010). Attention bias modification treatment: a meta-analysis toward the establishment of novel treatment for anxiety. Biological Psychiatry, 68, 982-990.

Heeren, A., Lievens, L., & Philippot, P. (2011). How does attention training work in social phobia: disengagement from threat or re-engagement to non-threat? Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 25, 1108-15.

Jaeger, T. F. (2008). Categorical Data Analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards Logit Mixed Models. Journal ofMemory and Language, 59, 434-446.

Klumpp, H., & Amir, N. (2009). Preliminary Study of Attention Training to Threat and Neutral Faces on Anxious Reactivity to a Social Stressor in Social Anxiety. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 34, 263-271.

Koster, E. H. W., Baert, S., Bockstaele, M., & de Raedt, R. (2010). Attentional retraining procedures: manipulating early or late components of attentional bias? Emotion, 10, 230-236.

Langner, O., Dotsch, R., Bijlstra, G., Wigboldus, D. H. J., Hawk, S. T., & van Knippenberg, A. (2010). Presentation and validation of the Radboud Faces Database. Cognition & Emotion, 24, 1377-1388.

Lonigan, C. J., & Vasey, M. W. (2009). Negative affectivity, effortful control, and attention to threat-relevant stimuli. Journal of AbnormalChild Psychology, 37, 387-99.

MacLeod, C. (2012). Cognitive bias modification procedures in the management of mental disorders. Current Opinions in Psychiatry, 25, 114-120.

MacLeod, C., Koster, E. H. W., & Fox, E. (2009). Whither cognitive bias modification research? Commentary on the special section articles. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 118, 89-99.

MacLeod, C., Matthews, A., & Tata, P. (1986). Attentional bias in emotional disorders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 95, 15-20.

MacLeod, C., Rutherford, E., Campbell, L., Ebsworthy, G., & Holker, L. (2002). Selective attention and emotional vulnerability: Assessing the causal basis of their association through the experimental manipulation of attentional bias. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 111, 107-123.

Mathews, A., & MacLeod, C. (1994). Cognitive approaches to emotion and emotional disorders. Annual Review of Psychology, 45, 25-50.

Mathews, A., & MacLeod, C. (2002). Induced processing biases have casual effects on anxiety. Cognition & Emotion, 16, 331-354.

Pinkham, A. E., Griffin, M., Baron, R., Sasson, N. J., & Gur, R. C. (2010). The face in the crowd effect: anger superiority when using real faces and multiple identities. Emotion, 10, 141-6.

Spielberger, C. D., Strelau, J., Tysarczyk, M., & Wrześniewski, K. (1987). Kwestionariusz samooceny STAI. Warszawa: Pracownia Testów Psychologicznych Polskiego Towarzystwa Psychologicznego.

Tottenham, N., Tanaka, J. W., Leon, A. C., McCarry, T., Nurse, M., Hare, T. A., Marcus, D. J., et al. (2009). The NimStim set of facial expressions: judgments from untrained research participants. Psychiatry Research, 168, 242-9.

Tran, T., Hertel, P., & Joorman, J. (2011). Cognitive bias modification: induced interpretive biases affect memory. Emotion, 11, 145-152.

Williams, J. M. G., Watts, F. N., MacLeod, C., & Mathews, A. M. (1997). Cognitive Psychology and Emotional Disorders (2nd ed.). Chichester, England: Wiley.

Polish Psychological Bulletin

The Journal of Committee for Psychological Sciences of Polish Academy of Sciences

Journal Information


CiteScore 2016: 0.33

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.185
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.258

Cited By

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 130 130 7
PDF Downloads 56 56 3