Psychiatrists' accounts of clinical significance in depression

Open access

Psychiatrists' accounts of clinical significance in depression

Clinical significance is a crucial element in the diagnosis of mental illness, yet, it is practically untheorised and significantly under-researched. This article takes up the question of how the criterion of clinical significance is translated into psychiatric practice. More particularly, it examines how psychiatrists account for the threshold between health and depression. The paper is anchored in the constructionist view of discourse underpinned by the assumptions of critically oriented discourse analysis. It is based upon a convenience sample of 39 semi-structured interviews with specialist-psychiatrists in south-western Poland. There is no discursive space for clinical significance in psychiatrists' accounts. There is no boundary, no decision to be taken as to whether the symptoms are clinically significant. Depression, invariably constructed in terms of diagnostic criteria, is always represented as fully developed, appearing out of thin air, with no period of falling ill. The article raises the issue of the validity and usefulness of psychiatric diagnosis.

American Psychiatric Association 2000. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th edition, text revision). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.

Barker, C. and Galasiński, D. (2001) Cultural Studies and Discourse Analysis. London: Sage

Baumeister, H. and Morar, V. (2008) The impact of clinical significance criteria on subthreshold depression prevalence rates. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 118: 443-450.

Beals, J., Novins, D.K., Spicer, P., Orton, H.D., Mitchell, C.M., Barón, A.E., Manson, S.M. and the AI-SUPERPFP Team (2004) Challenges in Operationalizing the DSM-IV Clinical Significance Criterion. Archives of General Psychiatry, 61: 1197-1207.

Bolton, D. (2008). What is mental disorder. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Crowe, M. (2002). Reflexivity and detachment: a discursive approach to women's depression. Nursing Inquiry; 9: 126-132.

Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Oxford: Polity Press

Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Longman.

Fava, G.A. and Tossani, E. (2007). Prodromal stage of major depression. Early Intervention in Psychiatry; 1: 9-18.

Fee, D. (2000). The project of pathology. In Fee, D. (ed.), Pathology and the Postmodern (pp. 74-99). London: Sage.

Foucault, M. (1973). The Birth of the Clinic. London: Tavistock.

Galasiński, D. (2000) The Language of Deception. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Galasiński, D. (2008). Men's Discourses of Depression. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

Haidet, P. and Paterniti, D.A. (2003). "Building" a history rather than "taking" one. Archives of Internal Medicine, 163: 1134-40.

Halliday, M. A. K. (1994) An Introduction to Functional Grammar, (2nd edition), London: Edward Arnold.

Horwitz, A.V. (2002). Creating Mental Illness. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Horwitz, A.V. and Wakefield, J.C. (2007). The Loss of Sadness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Kangas, I. (2001). Making sense of depression: perceptions of melancholia in lay narratives. Health, 5: 76-92.

Karp, D.A. and Tanarugsachock, V. (2000) Mental illness, caregiving, and emotion management. Qualitative Health Research, 10: 6-25

Karp, D.A. (1996). Speaking of Sadness. New York: Oxford University Press.

Kendell, R.E. (2002). Five criteria for an improved taxonomy of mental disorders. In J.E. Helzer and J.J. Hudziak (eds). Defining Psychopathology in the 21st century. (pp. 3-17). Washington: American Psychiatric Publishing.

Kendler, K.S. (1999). Setting boundaries for psychiatric disorders. American Journal of Psychiatry, 156: 12.

Kendler, K.S. and Gardner, C.O. (1998). Boundaries of major depression. An evaluation of DSM-IV criteria. American Journal of Psychiatry, 155: 172-177.

Kirk, S.A. & Kutchins, H. (1997). Making us Crazy. London: Constable.

Kirmayer, L. J. (2003). Failures of imagination: The refugee's predicament. Anthropology and Medicine, 10(2), 167-185.

Kleinman, A. (1988a). Rethinking Psychiatry. New York: Free Press.

Kleinman, A. (1988b). The illness narratives. New York: Basic Books.

Lehman, A.F., Alexopoulos, G.S., Goldman, H., Jeste, D. and Üstün, B. (2002). Mental Disorders and Disability: Time to Reevaluate the Relationship? In Kupfer, D.J., First, M.B. and Regier, D.A. (eds) A Research Agenda for DSM-V (pp. 201-218). Washington: American Psychiatric Association.

Mackinnon, R.A., Michels, R. and Buckley, P.J. (2006) The Psychiatric Interview in Clinical Practice. Washington: American Psychiatric Publishing

Martin, M.W. (1999). Depression: illness, insight, identity. Philosophy, Psychiatry and Psychology, 6: 271-286.

Mishler, E. (1984). The Discourse of Medicine. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Moreira, V. (2003). The ideological meaning of depression in the contemporary world. International Journal of Critical Psychology, 9: 143-159.

Narrow, W.E., Rae, D.S., Robins, L.N., and Regier, D.A. (2002) Revised prevalence estimates of mental disorders in the United States. Archives of General Psychiatry, 59: 115-123.

Pilgrim, D. (2007). The survival of psychiatric diagnosis. Social Science and Medicine, 65: 536-547.

Rosenhan, D.L. (1973). On being sane in insane places. Science, 179, 250-258.

Regier, D.A and Narrow W.E. (2002). Defining clinically significant psychopathology with epidemiologic data. In: Helzer, J.E. and Hudziak, J.J. (eds). Defining Psychopathology in 21st Century: DSM-V and Beyond (pp.19-30). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing.

Regier, D.A., Kaelber, C.T., Rae, D.S., Farmer, M.E., Knauper, B.; Kessler, R.C., and Norquist, G.S. (1998). Limitations of Diagnostic Criteria and Assessment Instruments for Mental Disorders: Implications for Research and Policy. Archives of General Psychiatry, 55: 109-115

Shaw, I. (2002). How lay are lay beliefs? Health: 6, 287-299.

Slade, T. And Andrews, G. (2002). Empirical impact of DSM-V diagnostic criterion for clinical significance. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 190: 334-7.

Spitzer, R.L. (1998). Diagnosis and need for treatment are not the same. Archives of General Psychiatry, 55: 120.

Spitzer, R.L. and Wakefield, J.C. (1999). DSM-IV diagnostic criterion for clinical significance: Does it help solve the false positives problem? American Journal of Psychiatry, 156: 1856-1864.

Spitzer, R.L. and Williams, J.B. (1982). The definition and diagnosis of mental disorder. In Grove, W.R. (ed.), Deviance and Mental Illness (pp. 15-31). Beverly Hills: Sage.

Stoppard, J.M (2000). Understanding depression. London: Routledge.

Szasz, T. (1987). Insanity. New York: John Wiley.

Thomas-McLean, R. and Stoppard, J.M. (2004). Physicians' constructions of depression: inside/outside the boundaries of medicalization. Health, 8: 275-293.

Titscher, S., Meyer, M., Wodak, R. and Vetter, E (2000). Methods of Text and Discourse Analysis. London: Sage.

Üstün, B. and Kennedy, C. (2009). What is ‘functional impairment’. Disentangling disability from clinical significance. World Psychiatry, 8: 82-85.

Van Dijk, T. A. (1993) Principles of Critical Discourse Analysis, Discourse & Society 4: 249-283

van Leeuwen, T. and Wodak, R. (1999). Legitimizing immigration control. Discourse Studies, 1: 83-118.

Verhaeghe, P. (2004). On Being Normal and Other Disorders. New York: Other Press.

Wang, P.S., Berglund, P., Olfson, M., Pincus, H.A., Wells, K.B. and Kessler, R.C. (2005) Failure and delay in initial treatment contact after first onset of mental disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication, Archives of General Psychiatry, 62: 603-613.

World Health Organisation 1992. The ICD-10 Classification of Mental and Behavioural Disorders: Clinical Descriptions and Diagnostic Guidelines. New York World Health Organisation.

Zimmerman, M., Chelminski, I., Young, D. (2004) On the threshold of disorder: a study of the impact of the DSM-IV clinical significance criterion on diagnosing depressive and anxiety disorders in clinical practice. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 65: 1400-5.

Polish Psychological Bulletin

The Journal of Committee for Psychological Sciences of Polish Academy of Sciences

Journal Information


CiteScore 2016: 0.33

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.185
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.258

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 116 116 14
PDF Downloads 29 29 4