Attention-driven bias for threat-related stimuli in implicit memory. Preliminary results from the Posner cueing paradigm

Open access

Attention-driven bias for threat-related stimuli in implicit memory. Preliminary results from the Posner cueing paradigm

An implicit memory advantage for angry faces was investigated in this experiment by means of an additional cueing task. Participants were to assess the orientation of a triangle's peak, which side of presentation was cued informatively by angry and neutral face stimuli, after which they immediately completed an unexpected "old-new" task on a set of the previously presented faces and new, distractor-faces. Surprisingly, the RTs were similarly long on the invalid trials for angry and neutral facial cues in the Posner task. However, performance on the "old-new" task was better for angry than neutral faces. A strong correlation between RTs in angry-invalid trials and confidence ratings for these angry faces was observed only in highly reactive participants. These results suggest that presentation of threatening material can induce enhanced incidental encoding which can result in stronger familiarity for such material, and this effect is driven by attentional bias in highly reactive individuals.

Bieling, P., Antony, M., & Swinson, R. (1998). The Stait-Trait Anxiety Inventory, Trait version: Structure and content re-examined. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 36(7-8), 777-788. doi:10.1016/S0005-7967(98)00023-0.

Bishop, S. J., Jenkins, R., & Lawrence, A. D. (2007). Neural processing of fearful faces: effects of anxiety are gated by perceptual capacity limitations. Cerebral cortex, 17(7), 1595-603. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhl070.

De Pascalis, V., Strelau, J., & Zawadzki, B. (1999). The effect of temperamental traits on event-related potentials, heart rate and reaction time. Personality and Individual Differences, 26(3), 441-465. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(98)00151-2.

Derryberry, D., & Reed, M. (1998). Anxiety and attentional focusing: trait, state and hemispheric influences. Personality and Individual Differences, 25(4), 745-761. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(98)00117-2.

Eysenck, M. W., & Keane, M. T. (2005). Cognitive psychology: a student's handbook. London: Psychology Press.

Fox, E., & Georgiou, G. A. (2005). The nature of attentional bias in human anxiety. In R. W. Engle, G. Sędek, U. von Hecker, & D. N. McIntosh (eds.), Cognitive limitations in aging and psychopathology (pp. 249-274). New York: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from http://books.google.com/books?id=d2xTM45sqEQC&pgis=1. http://books.google.com/books?id=d2xTM45sqEQC&pgis=1

Fox, E., Lester, V., Russo, R., Bowles, R. J., Pichler, A., & Dutton, K. (2000). Facial expressions of emotion: Are angry faces detected more efficiently? Cognition & Emotion, 14(1), 61-92. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17401453. [PUBMED]

Fox, E., Russo, R., Bowles, R., & Dutton, K. (2001). Do threatening stimuli draw or hold visual attention in subclinical anxiety? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130(4), 681-700. doi: 10.1037//0096-3445.130.4.681.

Fox, E., Russo, R., & Dutton, K. (2002). Attentional bias for threat: Evidence for delayed disengagement from emotional faces. Cognition & Emotion, 16(3), 355-379. Retrieved from http://www.informaworld.com/index/3X74E90P955AVVYH.pdf. http://www.informaworld.com/index/3X74E90P955AVVYH.pdf

Graf, P., & Mandler, G. (1984). Activation makes words more accessible, but not necessarily more retrievable. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 23(5), 553-568. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(84)90346-3.

LeDoux, J. E. (1998). The emotional brain: the mysterious underpinnings of emotional life. New York: Simon & Schuster.

Lundqvist, D., Flykt, A., & Öhman, A. (1998). The Karolinska Directed Emotional Faces - KDEF, CD ROM from Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Psychology section, Karolinska Institutet, ISBN 91-630-7164-9.

MacLeod, C., & Mathews, A. (1991). Biased cognitive operations in anxiety: Accessibility of information or assignment of processing priorities. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 29(6), 599-610. doi:10.1016/0005-7967(91)90009-R.

Mathews, A., Mogg, K., May, J., & Eysenck, M. (1989). Implicit and explicit memory bias in anxiety. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 98(3), 236-240.

Milders, M., Sahraie, A., Logan, S., & Donnellon, N. (2006). Awareness of faces is modulated by their emotional meaning. Emotion, 6(1), 10-17. doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.6.1.10.

Öhman, A., Lundqvist, D., & Esteves, F. (2001). The face in the crowd revisited: A threat advantage with schematic stimuli. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(3), 381-396. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.80.3.381.

Pessoa, L., McKenna, M., Gutierrez, E., & Ungerleider, L. G. (2002). Neural processing of emotional faces requires attention. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 99, 11458-11463.

Roediger, H. L. (1990). Implicit memory. Retention without remembering. The American Psychologist, 45(9), 1043-56. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2221571. [PUBMED]

Russo, R., Fox, E., Bellinger, L., & Nguyen-Van-Tam, D. (2001). Moodcongruent free recall bias in anxiety. Cognition & Emotion, 15(4), 419-433. doi:10.1080/0269993004200259.

Spielberger, C. D., Gorsuch, R. L., Lushene, R., Vagg, P. R., & Jacobs, G. A. (1983). Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

Spielberger, C. D., Strelau, J., Tysarczyk, M., & Wrześniewski, K. (2006). Inwentarz Stanu i Cechy Lęku (STAI): Podręcznik. Warszawa: Pracownia Testów Psychologicznych.

Stein, T., Peelen, M. V., Funk, J., & Seidl, K. N. (2010). The fearfulface advantage is modulated by task demands: evidence from the attentional blink. Emotion, 10(1), 136-40. doi: 10.1037/a0017814.

Strelau, J. (1996). The Regulative Theory of Temperament: Current status. Personality and Individual Differences, 20(2), 131-142. doi:10.1016/0191-8869(95)00159-X.

Strelau, J., & Zawadzki, B. (1993). The Formal Characteristics of Behaviour-Temperament Inventory (FCB-TI): theoretical assumptions and scale construction. European Journal of Personality, 7(5), 313-336. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/per.2410070504/abstract. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/per.2410070504/abstract

Strelau, J., & Zawadzki, B. (1995). The Formal Characteristics of Behaviour-Temperament Inventory (FCB-TI): Validity studies. European Journal of Personality, 9(3), 207-229. Retrieved from http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/112465696/abstract. http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/112465696/abstract

Vuilleumier, P., & Driver, J. (2007). Modulation of visual processing by attention and emotion: windows on causal interactions between human brain regions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 362, 837-855.

Williams, J. M. G., Watts, F. N., MacLeod, C. M., & Mathews, A. (1997). Cognitive psychology and emotional disorders. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons. Retrieved from http://books.google.com/books?id=7SxsAAAAMAAJ&pgis=1. http://books.google.com/books?id=7SxsAAAAMAAJ&pgis=1

Williamson, S., Harpur, T. J., & Hare, R. D. (1991). Abnormal processing of affective words by psychopaths. Psychophysiology, 28(3), 260-73. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1946892. [PUBMED]

Zagórska, A., Fajkowska, M., Strelau, J., & Jaśkowski, P. (2010, September). Temperament traits and ERP responses to facial affect: Validation of the Regulative Theory of Temperament. Poster presented at 3rd Biennial Symposium on Personality and Social Psychology, Warsaw.

Zawadzki, B., & Strelau, J. (1997). Formalna Charakterystyka Zachowania - Kwestionariusz Temperamentu (FCZ-KT): Podręcznik. Warszawa: Pracownia Testów Psychologicznych.

Polish Psychological Bulletin

The Journal of Committee for Psychological Sciences of Polish Academy of Sciences

Journal Information


CiteScore 2016: 0.33

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.185
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.258

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 84 84 11
PDF Downloads 25 25 2