Son Preference, Parity Progression and Contraceptive Use in South Asia

Open access


Background: The desire for sons has long been recognised as a significant determinant of childbearing decisions throughout most of South Asia. This paper provides an overview of the stated desire for sons and the manifestations of son-preferring behaviour in relation to parity progression and contraceptive use.

Methods: This paper uses the most recently available Demographic and Health Survey (or equivalent) data from five South Asian countries: Afghanistan, Bangladesh, India, Nepal and Pakistan. The extent of son preference in these countries is compared in terms of reported latent son preference as well as in terms of revealed son preference in relation to differential stopping behaviour, and choices about contraceptive use and contraceptive method.

Results: Parity progression is driven by son preference to some extent in all five countries studied. It is found that son preference is also a major factor in determining use of permanent contraceptive methods in every country apart from Afghanistan. The association is particularly strong in Nepal, India and Pakistan. Women with fewer than two sons are generally much less likely to use permanent contraceptive methods. On the other hand, son preference has little association with temporary or traditional contraceptive use in any country.

Conclusion: The desire for sons has a significant impact on fertility and contraceptive choices across much of South Asia, even in places where high fertility persists. Family planning programmes in these areas need to change deeply embedded attitudes in order to be successful. In Pakistan and Afghanistan in particular, future reductions in fertility could be hindered by high levels of son preference.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Arnold F. (1997). Gender preferences for children. Demographic and Health Surveys Comparative Studies no.23.

  • Arnold F. (2001). Son preference in South Asia. In: Z.A. Sathar & J.F. Phillips (Eds.) Fertility Transition in South Asia. Oxford University Press.

  • Basu D. & De Jong R. (2010). Son targeting fertility behavior: Some consequences and determinants. Demography 47(2): 521-536.

  • Bhat P.M. & Zavier A.F. (2003). Fertility decline and gender bias in Northern India. Demography 40(4): 637-657.

  • Bongaarts J. (2013). The implementation of preferences for male offspring. Population and Development Review 39(2): 185-208.

  • Brunson J. (2010). Son preference in the context of fertility decline: Limits to new constructions of gender and kinship in Nepal. Studies in Family Planning 41(2): 89-98.

  • Chaudhuri S. (2012). The desire for sons and excess fertility: A household-level analysis of parity progression in India. International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health 38(4): 178-186.

  • Dahal G.P. Padmadas S.S. et al. (2008). Fertility-limiting behavior and contraceptive choice among men in Nepal. International Family Planning Perspectives 34(1): 6-14.

  • Das Gupta M. & Bhat P.N.M. (1997). Fertility decline and increased manifestation of sex bias in India. Population Studies 51(3): 307-315.

  • Das Gupta M. Zhenghua J. et al. (2003). Why is son preference so persistent in East and South Asia? A cross-country study of China India and the Republic of Korea. Journal of Development Studies 40(2): 153-187.

  • Fledderjohann J. Agrawal S. et al. (2014). Do girls have a nutritional disadvantage compared with boys? Breast-feeding food consumption and mortality among Indian siblings. European Journal of Public Health 24(suppl 2): 134.

  • Frost M.D. Puri M. et al. (2013). Falling sex ratios and emerging evidence of sex-selective abortion in Nepal: Evidence from nationally representative survey data. BMJ Open 3(5).

  • Garenne M. (2002). Sex ratios at birth in African populations: A review of survey data. Human Biology 74(6): 889-900.

  • Guilmoto C. Z. (2009). The sex ratio transition in Asia. Population and Development Review 35(3): 519-549.

  • Hussain R. Fikree F. et al. (2000). The role of son preference in reproductive behaviour in Pakistan. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 78(3): 379-388.

  • ICF International (2011). Demographic and Health Surveys Methodology - Questionnaires: Household Woman’s and Man’s. Calverton Maryland USA. Measure DHS Phase III.

  • Jayachandran S. & Kuziemko I. (2009). Why do mothers breastfeed girls less than boys? Evidence and implications for child health in India. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper no. 15041.

  • Jayaraman A. Mishra V. et al. (2009). The relationship of family size and composition to fertility desires contraceptive adoption and method choice in South Asia. International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health 35(1): 29-38.

  • Jha P. Kesler M.A. et al. (2011). Trends in selective abortions of girls in India: Analysis of nationally representative birth histories from 1990 to 2005 and census data from 1991 to 2011. The Lancet 377(9781): 1921-1928.

  • Kabeer N. Huq L. et al. (2014). Diverging stories of “missing women” in South Asia: Is son preference weakening in Bangladesh? Feminist Economics 20(4): 138-163.

  • Kingdon G. G. (2002). The gender gap in educational attainment in India: How much can be explained? Journal of Development Studies 39(2): 25-53.

  • Leone T. Matthews Z. et al. (2003). Impact and determinants of sex preference in Nepal. International Family Planning Perspectives 29(2): 69-75.

  • Magadi M.A. & Curtis S.L. (2003). Trends and determinants of contraceptive method choice in Kenya. Studies in Family Planning 34(3): 149-159.

  • Miller B.D. (1984). Daughter neglect women’s work and marriage: Pakistan and Bangladesh compared. Medical Anthropology 8(2): 109-126.

  • Miller B.D. (1987). Female infanticide and child neglect in rural North India. In: N. Scheper-Hughes (Ed.) Child Survival pp 95-112. Dordrecht Holland: D. Reidel Publishing Company.

  • Mukherjee S.S. (2013). Women’s empowerment and gender bias in the birth and survival of girls in urban India. Feminist Economics 19(1): 1-28.

  • Murthi M. Guio A.-C. et al. (1995). Mortality fertility and gender bias in India: A district-level analysis. Population and Development Review 21(4): 745-782.

  • Pande R.P. (2003). Selective gender differences in childhood nutrition and immunization in rural India: The role of siblings. Demography 40(3): 395-418.

  • Park C.B. & Cho N.-H. (1995). Consequences of son preference in a low-fertility society: Imbalance of the sex ratio at birth in Korea. Population and Development Review 21(1): 59-84.

  • Sato M. (2007). Challenges and successes in family planning in Afghanistan. Management Sciences for Health Occasional Papers no.6.

  • Sudha S. & Rajan S.I. (1999). Female demographic disadvantage in India 1981–1991: Sex selective abortions and female infanticide. Development and Change 30(3): 585-618.

  • Waldron I. (1983). Sex differences in human mortality: The role of genetic factors. Social Science & Medicine 17(6): 321-333.

Journal information
Cited By
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 460 160 6
PDF Downloads 212 92 10