Comparative Studies of the Seatings of Propulsion Plants and Auxiliary Machinery on Chocks Made of Metal and Cast of Resin Part I. Mounting on Steel Chocks

Abstract

This paper presents a description and the results of experimental studies of the deformation, friction and structural damping occurring in foundation bolted joints of propulsion plant components and auxiliary machinery that is rigidly mounted on sea-going ships. The rigid mounting of these devices to the ships’ structural foundations can be implemented in a traditional way, i.e. on chocks made of metal (usually of steel), or in a modern way, i.e. on chocks cast of resin, specially designed for this purpose. The main goal of this study is to perform a comparative analysis of these two solutions and to give a scientific explanation for why chocks cast of resin perform better in machinery seatings than the steel chocks traditionally used for this purpose. The paper consists of two parts. Part I presents the details of the rigid mountings of machinery to the foundations, and contains the results of experimental studies performed on a model of a foundation bolted joint with a traditional steel chock. Part II contains the results of similar studies carried out for a model of a bolted joint with a modern chock cast of resin. Next, a comparative analysis and evaluation of the results obtained for both investigated bolted joints was carried out, and conclusions were formulated to highlight important aspects of the problem from the point of view of science and engineering practice.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • 1. Cherry E., Church J.E. (2014): Shipboard Maintenance of Machinery. Engine Foundations. ITW Chockfast Marine – Industrial Grouts, Adhesives, Repair Products and Coatings. Retrieved from: http://www.chockfast.com/reference.html.

  • 2. Germanischer Lloyd (2010): Guidelines for the Seating of Propulsion Plants and Auxiliary Machinery. Rules for Classification and Construction, VI, Part 4, Chapter 3.

  • 3. Grudziński K., Jaroszewicz W. (2002): Seating of Machines and Devices on Foundation Chocks Cast of EPY Resin Compound. ZAPOL, Dmochowski & Sobczyk Registered Partnership, Szczecin, 2002 (in Polish), 2004 (in English), 2005 (in Russian).

  • 4. Grudziński P., Konowalski K. (2012): Studies of Flexibility of Steel Adjustable Foundation Chock. Advances in Manufacturing Science and Technology, 36(2), 79–90.

  • 5. Grudziński P., Konowalski K. (2014): Experimental Investigations of Normal Deformations of Foundation Chocks Used in the Seating of Heavy Machines and Devices. Advances in Manufacturing Science and Technology Part I: Theoretical fundamentals and investigations of a steel chock, 38(1), 63–76; Part II. Experimental investigations of a chock cast of EPY resin, 38(2), 51–61.

  • 6. Grudziński K. (2008): Comparative Analysis of the Seatings of Reciprocating Compressors on the Foundations of Concrete and Steel Structures (in Polish). Report No. 1/08, Politechnika Szczecińska, Katedra Mechaniki i Podstaw Konstrukcji Maszyn, Szczecin (unpublished).

  • 7. Grudziński P. (2013): Research into the Vibration Isolating Properties of EPY Resin and the Possibility of Its Use to Reduce the Vibrations and Insulation of Structure-Borne Sound (in Polish). Sprawozdanie merytoryczne z wykonania projektu badawczego nr N N502 194938, Zachodniopomorski Uniwersytet Technologiczny w Szczecinie, Katedra Mechaniki i Podstaw Konstrukcji Maszyn, Szczecin 2013 (unpublished).

  • 8. Piaseczny L. (2002): Designing of Power Plant Rechocking Using a Pourable Polymer on Example of Ship’s Power Plant. Eksploatacja i Niezawodność Nr 2, 26–38, 2002.

  • 9. Wärtsilä (2014): Product Guide W32-1/2014, 15. Foundation, Wärtsilä, Ship Power Technology, Vaasa.

OPEN ACCESS

Journal + Issues

Search