Combustion and Emissions Investigation on Low-Speed Two-Stroke Marine Diesel Engine with Low Sulfur Diesel Fuel

Open access


With the implementation and expansion of international sulfur emission control areas, effectively promoted the marine low sulfur diesel fuel (MLSDF) used in marine diesel engines. In this study, a large low-speed, two-stroke, cross-head, common rail, electronic fuel injection marine diesel engine (B&W 6S35ME-B9) was used for the study. According to diesel engine’s propulsion characteristics, experiments were launched respectively at 25%, 50%, 75%, 100% load working conditions with marine low sulfur diesel fuel to analyze the fuel consumption, combustion characteristics and emissions (NOx, CO2, CO, HC) characteristics. The results showed that: Marine diesel engine usually took fuel injection after top dead center to ensure their safety control NOx emission. From 25% to 75% load working condition, engine’s combustion timing gradually moved forward and the inflection points of pressure curve after top dead center also followed forward. While it is necessary to control pressure and reduce NOx emission by delaying fuel injection timing at 100% load. Engine’s in-cylinder pressure, temperature, and cumulative heat release were increased with load increasing. Engine’s CO2 and HC emissions were significantly reduced from 25% to 75% load, while they were increased slightly at 100% load. Moreover, the fuel consumption rate had a similar variation and the lowest was only 178 g/kW·h at 75% load of the test engine with MLSDF. HC or CO emissions at four tests’ working conditions were below 1.23 g/kW·h and the maximum difference was 0.2 or 0.4 g/kW·h respectively, which meant that combustion efficiency of the test engine with MLSDF is good. Although the proportion of NOx in exhaust gas increased with engine’s load increasing, but NOx emissions were always between 12.5 and 13.0 g/kW·h, which was less than 14.4 g/kW·h. Thus, the test engine had good emissions performance with MLSDF, which could meet current emission requirements of the International Maritime Organization.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • 1. Eyring V. Isaksen I.S.A. Berntsen T. Collins W.J. Corbett J.J. Endresen O. Grainger R.G. Moldanova J. Schlager H. Stevenson D.S.. Transport impacts on atmosphere and climate: shipping. Atmospheric Environment. 44(37) 4735-4771 2010.

  • 2. Jostein K. Sundet Stig B. Dalsøren Ivar S. A. Isaksen Tore F. Berglen. Emission from international sea transportation and environmental impact. Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres. 108 (D17) 4560 2003.

  • 3. Eyring V. Köhler H.W. van Aardenne J. Lauer A.. Emissions from international shipping: 1. The last 50 years. Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres. 110 (D17) 1-12 2005.

  • 4. Bajic J. Simunovic S. Steiner S.. Air Transport in the European System of CO2 Emissions Trading. Hrvatsko Znanstveno Drustvo za Promet. 33(1-2) 123-129 2013

  • 5. Corbett J.J. Fischbeck P.S. Pandis S.N.. Global nitrogen and sulfur inventories for oceangoing ships. Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres. 104(3) 3457-3470 1999.

  • 6. Koenig D. Global and regional approaches to ship air emissions regulation: the international maritime organization and the European Union. Advances in Space Research the Official Journal of committee on Space Research. 31(1) 25 2013.

  • 7. Eyring V. Isaksen I.S.A. Berntsen T. Collins W.J. Corbett J.J. Endresen O. Grainger R.G. Moldanova J. Schlager H. Stevenson D.S. Assessment of Transport impacts on climate and Ozone: shipping. Berichte Der Bunsengesellschaft Für Physikalische Chemie. 98 (9): 1109-1110 2009.

  • 8. Bond T.C. Doherty S.J. Fahey D.W. Fprster P.M. Berntsen T. DeAngelo B.J. Flanner M.G. Ghan S. Karcher B. Koch D.. Bounding the role of black carbon in the climate system: a scientific assessment. Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres. 118(11) 5380-5552 2013.

  • 9. Andy H.F. Anthony J.M. Kirk R.S. Lan R. James W.M. Anil M. Ben G.A. Diarmid C.L. Alan D.D. Michael D. Nigel B. Cathryn T.S. Mark B. Paul W.. Public health benefits of strategies to reduce greenhouse-gas emission: overview and implications for policy makers. The Lancet. 374(9707) 2104-2114 2010.

  • 10. Psaraftis H.N.. Market-based measures for greenhouse gas emissions from ships: a review. Wmu Journal of Maritime Affairs. 11(2) 11:211-232 2012.

  • 11. Schinas O. Stefanakos C.N.. Selecting technologies towards compliance with MARPOL Annex VI: The perspective of operators. Transportation Research Part D-Transport and Environment. 28(28) 28-40 2014.

  • 12. Hongxia W. Hong F. Xueying Y. Ke W.. Development of natural gas vehicles in China: an assessment of enabling factors and barriers. Energy Policy. 85 80-93 2015.

  • 13. Lamas M.I. Rodriguez C.G. Aas H.P.. Computational fluid dynamics analysis of NOx and other pollutants in the man B&W 7S50MC marine engine and effect of EGR and water addition. International Journal of Maritime Engineering. 155 81-88 2013.

  • 14. Yang Z.L. Zhang D. Caglayan O. Jenkinson I.D. Bonsall S. Wang J. Huang M. Yan X.P.. Selection of techniques for reducing shipping NOx and SOx emissions. Transportation Research Part D-Transport and Environment. 17 478-486 2012.

  • 15. Francersco D.N.. Claudia C.. Particulate matter in marine diesel engines exhausts: Emissions and control strategies. Transportation Research Part D-Transport and Environment. 40 166-191 2015.

  • 16. Kowalski J. An experimental study of emission and combustion characteristics of marine diesel engine with fuel pump malfunctions. Applied Thermal Engineering. 65 469-476 2014.

  • 17. Gokalp B. Buyukkaya E. Soyhan H.S. Performance and emissions of a diesel tractor engine fueled with marine diesel and soybean methyl ester. Biomass and Bioenergy. 35 3575-3583 2011.

  • 18. Rakopoulos D.C.. Heat release analysis of combustion in heavy-duty turbocharged diesel engine operating on blends of diesel fuel with cottonseed or sunflower oils and their bio-diesel. Fuel. 96(1) 524-534 2012.

  • 19. Khabbaz S.A. Mobasheri R.. Experimental investigation of the effects of Tri-aromatic utilization on combustion process emission characteristics and engine performance of a DI diesel engine. Fuel. 123 26-32 2014.

  • 20. Chaparala S.V. Raj A. Chung S.H.. Reaction mechanism for the formation of nitrogen oxides during coke oxidation in fluidized catalytic cracking units. Combustion Science and Technology. 187(11) 1683-1704 2015.

  • 21. Rangel L.P. Buchler P.M.. Study of nitrogen in the combustion of natural gas. Quimica Nova. 28(6) 957-963 2005.

  • 22. Sharpe B. Muncrief R.. Literature review: real-world fuel consumption of heavy-duty vehicles in the United States China and the European Union. Annales De Dermatologie Et De Vénéréologie. 140(12) S553 2013.

  • 23. Yoon S.J. Collins J. Thiruvengadam A. Gautam M. Herner J. Ayala A.. Criteria pollutant and greenhouse gas emissions from CNG transit buses equipped with three-way catalysts compared to lean-burn engines and oxidation catalyst technologies. Journal of Air and Waste Management Association. 63(8) 923-933 2013.

  • 24. Karavalakis G. Hajbabaei M. Durbin T.D. Johnson K.C. Zheng Z.Q. Miller W.J.. The effect of natural gas composition on the regulated emissions gaseous toxic pollutants and ultrafine particle number emissions from a refuse hauler vehicle. Energy. 50(1) 280-291 2013.

  • 25. Fontaras G. Martini G. Manfredi U. Marotta A. Krasenbrink A. Maffioletti F. Terenghi R. Colombo M.. Assessment of on-road emissions of four Euro V diesel and CNG waste collection 2 trucks for supporting air-quality improvement initiatives in the city of Milan. Science of the Total Environment. 426(5) 65-72 2012.

  • 26. Hajbabaei M. Karavalakis G. Johnson K.C. Lee L. Durbin T.D.. Impact of natural gas fuel composition on criteria toxic and particle emissions from transit buses equipped with lean burn and stoichiometric engines. Energy. 62(6) 425-434 2013.

Journal information
Impact Factor

IMPACT FACTOR 2018: 1.214
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1.086

CiteScore 2018: 1.48

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.391
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 1.141

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 153 153 13
PDF Downloads 116 116 6