Towards the Building Information Modeling-Based Capital Project Lifecycle Management in the Luxury Yacht Industry

Open access


It will be a new approach that BIM’s capital project lifecycle management (CPLM) applied to the yacht industry. This paper explored the feasibility of applying the principles and rationales of BIM for capital project lifecycle management in luxury yacht design, engineering, fabrication, construction and operation. The paper examined the premises and backbone technology of BIM. It then evaluated leading naval engineering and shipbuilding software applications and their development trends from the functional lens of BIM. To systematically investigate a BIM-based approach for capital project lifecycle management (CPLM) in the luxury yacht industry, the paper proposed and outlined an implementation framework. A case study and a student competition use case were discussed to delineate the core constituents and processes of the proposed framework. The case of BIM was reviewed. Through the domestic custom luxury yacht design and prototyping student competition, the application of this framework in educational research is demonstrated and the initial quantitative assessment of the framework is carried out. Conclusions: a BIM-based CPLM implementation framework can help the luxury yacht industry capitalize on the global transformation to an information-centric and data-driven new business paradigm in shipbuilding with integrated design, manufacturing and production.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • 1. NIBS. 2007. Unite States National Building Information Modeling Standard Version 1 - Part 1: Overview Principles and Methodologies Washington DC.

  • 2. J. Yang X. Zhang 2009. Building Information Integration Model and Supporting Technology Standard. Construction Technology 38(10) 109-112.

  • 3. W. Wu R. R. A. Issa 2010. Feasibility of integrating building information modeling and LEED certification process. In: International Conference on Computing in Civil and Building Engineering. Nottingham. pp. 161.

  • 4. McGraw-Hill Construction 2009. The Business Value of BIM: Getting Building Information Modeling to the Bottom Line. M.-H. Construction Bedford MA.

  • 5. McGraw-Hill Construction. 2012. The Business Value of BIM in North America: Multi-Year Trend Analysis and User Ratings (2007-2012). M.-H. Construction Bedford MA.

  • 6. C. Eastman P. Teicholz R. Sacks K. Liston 2011. BIM Handbook: A Guide to Building Information Modeling for Owners Managers Designers Engineers and Contractors (2nd ed.). NJ: John Wiley and Sons Hoboken.

  • 7. AIA 2014. AIA TAP BIM Awards - 2014 Professionas’ Choice BIM Award.

  • 8. W. Wu R. R. A. Issa 2012. Leveraging Cloud-BIM for LEED Automation. Journal of Information Technology in Construction 17 367-384.

  • 9. B. Becerik-Gerber K. Ku F. Jazizadeh 2012. BIM-Enabled Virtual and Collaborative Construction Engineering and Management. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice 138(3) pp. 234-245.

  • 10. W. Zhong T. Jiang 2014. Collaborative Construction based on BIM Standard. Journal of Information Technology in Civil Engineering and Architecture 6(5) pp. 95-101.

  • 11. L. Ran 2015. Transferring best practices enabled by Building information modeling (BIM) in Architecture Engineering and Construction (AEC) to shipbuilding industry: An explorative study. (Industry Engineering and Management Master) Aalto University Espoo Finland.

  • 12. L. Ran V. Singh 2016a. Building information modellingenabled best practices in AEC and takeaways for Finnish shipbuilding industry. International Journal of Product Lifecycle Management 9(3) pp. 238.

  • 13. L. Ran V. Singh 2016b. Comparing BIM in Construction with 3D Modeling in Shipbuilding Industries: Is the Grass Greener on the Other Side? In A. Bouras B. Eynard S. Foufou & K.-D. Thoben (Eds.) Product Lifecycle Management in the Era of Internet of Things (pp. 193- 202): Springer International Publishing.

  • 14. M. Braglia D. Castellano M. Frosolini 2014. Computeraided activity planning (CAAP) in large-scale projects with an application in the yachting industry. Computers in Industry 65(4) pp. 733-745.

  • 15. K. Hiekata M. Grau 2014. Case Studies for Concurrent Engineering Concept in Shipbuilding Industry. In J. Cha S.-Y. Chou J. Stjepandić R. Curran & W. Xu (Eds.) Moving Integrated Product Development to Service Clouds in the Global Economy (Vol. 1 pp. 102-111): IOS Press Inc.

  • 16. W. Tann H.-J. Shaw R. Bronsart 2005. Integrating the Collaborative Environment in Shipbuilding: An Implementation Strategy. Journal of Ship Production 21(1) pp. 37-45.

  • 17. CADMATIC 2016. CADMATIC Marine Design.

  • 18. Intergraph 2016a. Intergraph Smart 3D.

  • 19. Intergraph 2016b. SmartMarine Enterprise: Improving the Complete Marine Life Cycle.

  • 20. Intergraph 2009. Capital Project Life Cycle Management (cPLM) vs. Product Life Cycle Management (PLM) for the Shipbuilding Marine and Offshore Industries.

  • 21. N. Gu K. London 2010. Understanding and facilitating BIM adoption in the AEC industry. Automation in Construction 19(8) pp. 988-999.

  • 22. J. E. Gaul M. N. Rieger 2016. BIM Use in New Aircraft Carrier Pier and Bulkhead Rehabilitation Design.

Journal information
Impact Factor

IMPACT FACTOR 2018: 1.214
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1.086

CiteScore 2018: 1.48

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.391
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 1.141

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 450 216 7
PDF Downloads 402 227 10