Seaport network performance measurement in the context of global freight supply chains

Open access


A global distribution channel with a reliable freight transport system is essential in the contemporary world economy. Acting as trade facilitators, seaports are important players in the system. The study of the role of ports in supply chain management has recently drawn increasing attention from researchers and industry professionals alike. However, prior works mainly gathered the views from ports and terminals. To the authors’ knowledge, no attempt by previous empirical studies has been made to cover the perspective from shippers and logistics providers, who are obviously taking a serious role in the process of global freight movements as major stakeholders. It becomes thus imperative to assess a port’s supply chain orientation and performance from the perspective of the port users in the supply chain. Studying ports in the network context would be even more beneficial to capture the complexity needed to understand port performance and its interaction with various stakeholders. Drawing reference from multi-disciplinary fields, this paper aims to fill in the gap by developing a so-called unified framework for analysing port’s integration in global freight supply chains including shipping line networks, hinterland and intermodal transport network, and even urban network. The framework embraces a wider group of stakeholders involved, for example, terminal operators, port authorities, shippers, shipping companies, inland transport providers, freight forwarders/logistics service providers, cities and other ports in the networks. A port that is a key node in these networks simultaneously would be able to create and sustain value for port stakeholders. Port authorities and operators can refer to the framework as their network performance indicators so as to obtain a better understanding of the various considerations in a port’s network performance and to assist in positioning the port within the complex dynamics in the context of global freight supply chains. Finally, the framework developed in the paper can serve as a guide to empirical examinations of an emerging theme - a network-oriented performance by seaports along global freight supply chains - leading to various possible channels in future research.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • 1. Almotairi B. and Lumsden K. (2009) Port logistics platformintegration in supply chain management International Journal of Shipping and Transport Logistics 1(2) 194-210.

  • 2. Alvarado U.Y. and Kotzab H. (2001) Supply chainmanagement: the integration of logistics in marketing Industrial Marketing Management 30(2) 183-198

  • 3. Bichou K. and Gray R. (2004) A logistics and supply chainmanagement approach to port performance measurement Maritime Policy and Management 31(1) 47-67.

  • 4. Birley S. (1985) The role of networks in the entrepreneurialprocess Journal of Business Venturing 1(1) 107-117.

  • 5. Borgatti S.P. and Li X. (2009) On social network analysis ina supply chain context Journal of Supply Chain Management 45(2) 5-22.

  • 6. Braglia M. and Petroni A. (2000) A quality assurance-orientedmethodology for handling trade-offs in supplier selection International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management 30(2) 96-111.

  • 7. Brajkovich L.F. (1994) Sources of social structure in a start-uporganization: work networks work activities and job status Social Networks 16(3) 191-212

  • 8. Carbone V. and Martino M. (2003) The changing role of portsin supply chain management: an empirical analysis Maritime Policy and Management 30(4) 305-320.

  • 9. Carbone V. and Gouvernal E. (2007) Supply chain and supplychain management: appropriate concepts for maritime studies. In Wang J. Olivier D. Notteboom T. and Slack B. (Eds.) Ports Cities and Global Supply Chains England: Ashgate 11-26.

  • 10. Carter C.R. Ellram L.M. and Tate W.L. (2007) The Useof Social Network Analysis in Logistics Research Journal of Business Logistics 28(1) 137-168.

  • 11. Chan F.T.S. and Kumar N. (2007) Global supplierdevelopment considering risk factors using fuzzy extendedAHP-based approach. OMEGA - International Journal of Management Science 35(4) 417-431.

  • 12. Coe N.M. Dicken P. and Hess M. (2008) Global productionnetworks: realizing the potential Journal of Economic Geography 8 271-295.

  • 13. Cullinane K. Ping J. and Wang T.-F. (2002) A multiobjectiveprogramming approach to the optimization of China’sinternational container transport network International Journal of Transport Economics 29 181-99.

  • 14. De Souza G.A. Beresford A.K.C. Pettit S.J. (2003) Linershipping companies and terminal operators: internationalizationor globalization? Maritime Economics and Logistics 5(4) 393-412.

  • 15. De Langen PW. (2007) Stakeholders conflicting interestsand governance in port clusters Research in Transportation Economics 17 457-478.

  • 16. Doshi D. Malhotra B. Bressan S. and Lam J.S.L. (2012) Mining maritime schedules for analyzing global shippingnetworks International Journal of Business Intelligence and Data Mining in press.

  • 17. Driessen H. (2005) Mediterranean port cities: cosmopolitanismreconsidered History and Anthropology 16(1) 129-141.

  • 18. Ducruet C. Lee S.W. and Ng A.K.Y. (2010) Centrality andvulnerability in liner shipping networks: revisiting the NortheastAsian port hierarchy Maritime Policy and Management 37(1) 17-36.

  • 19. Dyer J.H. and Singh H. (1998) The relational view: cooperativestrategy and sources of inter-organisationalcompetitive advantage Academy of Management Review 23 660-679.

  • 20. Eisenhardt K.M. (1989). Building theories from case studyresearch Academy of Management Review 14(4) 532-550

  • 21. Fleming D. and Hayuth Y. (1994) Spatial characteristics oftransportation hubs: centrality and intermediacy Journal of Transport Geography 2(1) 3-18.

  • 22. Freeman L.C. (1977) A set of measures of centrality based onbetweenness Sociometry 40(1) 35-41.

  • 23. Freeman L.C. (1979) Centrality in social networks: conceptualclarification Social Networks 1 215-239.

  • 24. Fujita M. and Mori T. (1996) The role of ports in the makingof major cities: Self-agglomeration and hub-effect Journal of Development Economics 49 93-120.

  • 25. Fynes B. Voss C. de Burca S. (2005) The impact of supplychain relationship quality on quality performance International Journal of Production Economics 96 339-354.

  • 26. Garcia F.A. Marchetta M.G. Camargom M. Morel L. and Forradellas R.Q. (2012) A framework for measuring logisticsperformance in the wine industry International Journal of Production Economics 135 284-298.

  • 27. Grossmann I. (2008) Perspectives for Hamburg as a port cityin the context of a changing global environment Geoforum 39 2062-2072.

  • 28. Hakansson H. and Ford D. (2002) How should companiesinteract in business networks. Journal of Business Research 55 133-139.

  • 29. Hall P.V. and Robbins G. (2007) Which link in whichchain? Inserting Durban into global automotive supply chains In Wang J. Olivier D. Notteboom T. and Slack B. (Eds.) Ports Cities and Global Supply Chains England: Ashgate 221-231.

  • 30. Hayuth Y. (2007) Globalisation and the port-urban interface:conflicts and opportunities In Wang J. Olivier D. Notteboom T. and Slack B. (Eds.) Ports Cities and Global Supply Chains England: Ashgate141-156.

  • 31. Hayuth Y. and Fleming D.K. (1994) Concepts of strategiccommercial location: the case of container ports Maritime Policy and Management 21(3) 187-193.

  • 32. Ketchen D. J. Jr. Rebarick W. Hult G.T.M. and Meyer D. (2008) Best value supply chains: A key competitive weapon forthe 21st century Business Horizons 51 235-243.

  • 33. Lagoudis I. N. Lalwani C.S. and Naim M.M. (2006) Ranking of factors contributing to higher performance in theocean transportation industry: a multi-attribute utility theoryapproach Maritime Policy and Management 33 345 - 369.

  • 34. Lam J.S.L. (2011) Patterns of maritime supply chains: slotcapacity analysis Journal of Transport Geography 19(2) 366-374.

  • 35. Lam J.S.L. and Yap W.Y. (2006) A measurement andcomparison of cost competitiveness of container ports inSoutheast Asia Transportation 33(6) 641-654.

  • 36. Lam J.S.L. and Yap W.Y. (2011) Dynamics of liner shippingnetwork and port connectivity in supply chain systems: analysison East Asia Journal of Transport Geography 19(6) 1272-1281.

  • 37. Langley C.J. and Holcomb M.C. (1992) Creating logisticscustomer value Journal of Business Logistics 13(2) 1-27

  • 38. Larson A. and Starr J.A. (1993) A network model oforganization formation Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice 17 35-46.

  • 39. Lee S.W. Song D.W. and Ducruet C. (2008) A tale of Asia’sworld ports: the spatial evolution in global hub port cities Geoforum 39 372-385.

  • 40. Lu X.H. Huang L.H. and Heng M.S.H. (2006) Criticalsuccess factors of inter-organizational information systems: Acase study of Cisco and Xiao Tong in China Information and Management 43(3) 395-408.

  • 41. Magala M. and Sammons A. (2008) A new approach to portchoice modelling Maritime Economics and Logistics 10(1/2) 9-34.

  • 42. Mangan J. and Lalwani C. (2008) Port-centric logistics International Journal of Logistics Management 19(1) 29-41.

  • 43. Notteboom T. E. and Rodrigue J.-P. (2005) PortRegionalization: Towards A New Phase in Port Development Maritime Policy and Management 32(3) 297-313.

  • 44. Notteboom T.E. and Rodrigue J.-P. (2008) ContainerisationBox Logistics and Global Supply Chains: The Integration ofPorts and Liner Shipping Networks. Maritime Economics and Logistics 10(1-2) 152-174.

  • 45. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (2010) Trends in the Transport Sector 2011 OECD Publishing.

  • 46. Paixao A. C. and Marlow P. B. (2003) Fourth generationports- a question of agility? International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management 33(4) 355-376.

  • 47. Panayides P.M. and Song D.-W. (2008) Evaluating theintegration of seaport container terminals in supply chains International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management 38(7) 562-584.

  • 48. Parola F. & Sciomachen A. (2005) Intermodal ContainerFlows in A Port System Network: Analysis of Possible GrowthsVia Simulation Models International Journal of Production Economics 97(1) 75-88.

  • 49. Partanen J. and Moller K. (2011) How to build a strategicnetwork: A practitioner-oriented process model for the ICTsector Industrial Marketing Management doi:10.1016/ j.indmarman.2011.05.002.

  • 50. Paulraj A. Lado A.A. and Chen I.J. (2008) Interorganizationalcommunication as a relational competency:Antecedents and performance outcomes in collaborative buyer-supplier relationships Journal of Operations Management 26(1) 45-64.

  • 51. Pettit S. J. and Beresford A. K. C. (2009) Port development:from gateways to logistics hubs Maritime Policy and Management 36(3) 253-267.

  • 52. Perez-Labajos C. and Blanco B. (2004) Competitive policiesfor commercial sea ports in the EU. Marine Policy 28(6) 553-556.

  • 53. Robinson R. (2002) Ports as elements in value-driven chainsystems: the new paradigm Maritime Policy and Management 29 241-255.

  • 54. Roso V. (2007) Evaluation of the dry port concept from anenvironmental perspective: A note Transportation Research Part D 12 523-527.

  • 55. Roso V. Woxenius J. and Lumsden K. (2009) The Dry PortConcept: Connecting Container Seaports with the Hinterland Journal of Transport Geography 17(5) 338-345.

  • 56. Saldanha J.P. Tyworth J.E. Swan P.F. and Russell D.M. (2009) Cutting logistics costs with ocean carrier selection Journal of Business Logistics 30(2) 175-195.

  • 57. Song D.-W. and Panayides P.M. (2008) Global supply chainand port/terminal: integration and competitiveness Maritime Policy and Management 35(1) 73-87.

  • 58. Srinivasan K. Kekre S. Mukhopadhyay T. (1994) Impactof electronic data interchange technology on JIT shipments Management Science 40 1291-1304.

  • 59. Starr J.T. and Slack B. (1995). Ports As Gateways: ATraditional Concept Revisited. Proceeding of the 5th Conference International Villes et Ports Dakar 89-96.

  • 60. Suykens F. (1989) The city and its port: an economicappraisal Geoforum 20(4) 437-445.

  • 61. Tan T.Y. (2007) Port cities and hinterlands: A comparativestudy of Singapore and Calcutta Political Geography 26 851-865.

  • 62. Tongzon J. Chang Y.T. and Lee S.Y. (2009) How supply chainoriented is the port sector? International Journal of Production Economics 122 21-34.

  • 63. UNCTAD (1999). The fourth generation port. UNCTAD Ports Newsletter 19 9-12.

  • 64. Wilding R. and Humphries A.S. (2006) Understandingcollaborative supply chain relationships through theapplication of the Williamson organizational failure framework International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management 36( 4) 309-329.

  • 65. Woo S.H. Pettit S. and Beresford A.K.C. (2011) Portevolution and performance in changing logistics environments Maritime Economics and Logistics 13(3) 250-277.

  • 66. Yeo G.T. Roe M. and Dinwoodie J. (2011) Measuring thecompetitiveness of container ports: logisticians’ perspectives European Journal of Marketing 45(3) 455 - 470.

Journal information
Impact Factor

IMPACT FACTOR 2018: 1.214
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1.086

CiteScore 2018: 1.48

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.391
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 1.141

Cited By
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 411 227 6
PDF Downloads 228 139 5