Women’s rights and minorities’ rights in Canada. The challenges of intersectionality in Supreme Court jurisprudence

Open access

Abstract

After a discussion of the impact of the principle of equality, entrenched in the Charters approved in Canada since the 1867 British North American Act, this essay then focuses on the related Supreme Court’s adjudications. A brief analysis of the case-law concerning gender equality is followed by the discussion of cases of Aboriginal and Muslim women with the aim of assessing whether intersectionality represents for these groups of women a source of double discrimination. Brief concluding remarks discuss the challenges deriving from the different options for accommodating the principle of equality with cultural rights.

• Arbour Jane M., 2003, ‘The Protection of Aboriginal Rights Within a Human Rights Regime: In Search of an Analytical Framework for Section 25 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms’, Supreme Court Law Review, XXI: 3.

• Baines Beverley, 2005a, ‘Is Substantive Equality a Constitutional Doctrine?’, Queen’s University Legal Research Paper n. 2015-042.

• Baines Beverley, 2005b ‘Using the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms to Constitute Women’, in Baines Beverley and Ruth Rubio-Marin (eds), The Gender of Constitutional Jurisprudence, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

• Baines Beverley, 2012, ‘Comparing Women in Canada’, Feminist Legal Studies, XX(2): 89-103.

• Bonifacio Glenda Tibe, 2012, ‘Introduction’, in Bonifacio Glenda Tibe (ed), Feminism and Migration: cross-cultural engagements, Springer, London

• Boyd Susan B., 2004, ‘The responsible divorce?’, Canadian Journal of Women and the Law, XVI: 397-400.

• Bryan Penelope, 1999, ‘Collaborative Divorce’: meaningful reform or another quick fix?, Psychology, Public Policy and Law, V(4): 1001-1117.

• Canada Special Committee on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, Minutes of Proceedings and Evidence, n. 1-12, 12-29 July 1960, 643.

• Carens Joseph H., 1990, ‘Difference and domination: reflections on the relation between pluralism and equality’, Nomos, XXXII: 226-250

• Ceccherini Eleonora, 2016, ‘Canadian Aboriginal Law: la sfida della diversità’, Studi parlamentari e di politica costituzionale, CXCIII-CXCIV: 23-61.

• Cleverdon Catherine L.., 1974, The women suffrage movement in Canada, University of Toronto Press, Toronto.

• Devaux Monique, 2000, ‘Conflicting equalities? Cultural group rights and sexual equality’, Political studies, XLVIII(3): 522-539.

• Fournier Pascale and See Erica, 2014, ‘The “naked face” of secular exclusion. Bill 94 and the privatization of belief’, in Lefevbre Solange and Beaman Lori G. (eds), Religion in the Public Sphere. Canadian Case Studies, University of Toronto Press, Toronto, 275-292.

• Goel Rashmi, 2000, ‘No women at the center. The use of the Canadian sentencing circle in domestic violence cases’, Wisconsin Women’s Law Journal, XV: 293-334.

• Harder Lois and Patten Steve (eds), 2015, Patriation and its consequences. Constitution Making in Canada, University of British Columbia Press, Vancouver.

• Huntington Samuel P., 1993, ‘The Clash of Civilizations?’, Foreign Affairs LXXII(1): 22-49

• Huntington Samuel P., 1997, The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order, Simon & Schuster, New York

• Jamieson Kathleen, 1978, Indian Women and the Law in Canada: Citizens Minus, Advisory Council on the Status of Women, Ottawa.

• Kymlika Will, 1995, Multicultural citizenship, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

• Kymlika Will, 1997, ‘Liberal complacencies’, The Boston Review, XXII: 29-30.

• Ladner Kiera, 2015, ‘An indigenous constitutional paradox: both monumental achievement and monumental defeat’, in Harder Lois and Patten Steve (eds), 2015, Patriation and its consequences. Constitution Making in Canada, University of British Columbia Press, Vancouver, 267-289.

• La Barbera MariaCaterina, 2009, ‘Intersectional Gender: Thinking about Gender and Cultural Difference in the Global Society’, The Global Studies Journal, II.

• La Barbera MariaCaterina, 2012, Intersectional-Gender and the Locationality of Women ‘in transit’, in Bonifacio Glenda Tibe (ed), Feminism and Migration: cross-cultural engagements, Springer, London

• MacLaren Sherrill, 1991, Invisible Power: Behind the Scenes with Canadian Women of Influence, Seal Books, Toronto.

• McIvor Sharon, 2004, ‘Aboriginal Women Unmasked: Using Equality Litigation to Advance Women’s Rights’, Canadian Journal of Women and the Law, XVI: 106

• Monture-Okanee Patricia A., 1992, ‘The Roles and Responsibilities of Aboriginal Women: Reclaiming Justice’, Saskatchewan Law Review, LVI(2): 237-266.

• Native Women’s Association of Canada, Section 1.2 of the Canadian Human Rights Act: Balancing Collective and Individual Rights and the Principle of Gender Equality, July 2010.

• Okin Susan, 1997, ‘Is multiculturalism bad for women?’, The Boston Review, XXII: 25-25.

• Paludi Michelle, 2010, ‘Introduction’, in Paludi Michelle A. (ed), Feminism and women’s rights worldwide: heritage, roles and issues, ABC-CLIO, Santa Barbara.

• Parekh Bhikhu, 1996, ‘Minority Practices and Principles of toleration’, International Migration Review, XXX(1): 251-284.

• Pentney William, 1988, ‘The rights of Aboriginal peoples of Canada and the Constitutional Act 1982’, University of British Columbia Law Review, XXII(2): 207-278.

• Said Edward W., 1979, Orientalism, Vantage Books, New York.

• Scotti Valentina R., 2014, ‘Il multiculturalismo canadese e le comunità islamiche: due casi di studio per un problematico percorso di integrazione’, in Ceccherini Eleonora (ed), 1982-2012 A trent’anni dalla Patriation canadese. Riflessioni della dottrina italiana, Università di Genova Press, Genova

• Sharpe Robert J. and McMahon Patricia I., 2007, The Persons Case: the origins and legacy of the fight for legal personhood, University of Toronto Press, Toronto.

• Volpp Leti, 1996. ‘Talking “culture”: gender. Race, nation, and the politics of multiculturalism’, Columbia Law Review, XCVI(6): 1573-1617.

• Wall David S., 2001, ‘Canadian Aboriginal circles: alternative or compromise in the politics of criminal justice’, in Thornton Martin and Todd Roy (eds), Aboriginal Peoples and Other Canadians, University of Ottawa Press, Ottawa, 161.

• Weaver Sally, 1974, ‘Judicial Preservation of Ethnic Group Boundaries: the Iroquois case’, in Barkow Jerome H. (ed), Proceedings of first congress. Canadian Ethnology Society, National Museums of Man Mercury Series, Ottawa, 48.

• Weaver Sally, 1981, Making Canadian Indian Policy. The hidden agenda 1968-70, University of Toronto Press, Toronto.

• Wilkins Kerry (ed), 2004, Advancing Aboriginal Claims: Visions, Strategies, Directions, Centre for Constitutional Studies University of Alberta, Edmonton.

• Yeğenoğlu Meyda, 1998, Colonial Fantasies: Towards a Feminist Reading of Orientalism, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Journal Information

CiteScore 2017: 0.20

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.107
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.395

Target Group researchers, academics, practitioners interested in the field of political, economic and legal issues in federal states, regional organizations, and international organizations at global level

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 310 310 49
PDF Downloads 160 160 36