Patenting in Europe: The Jurisdiction of the CJEU over European Patent Law


This paper will deal with EU competence over patent law, especially in the context of the TRIPS Agreement with reference to the ruling of CJEU in the Daiichi Sankyo case (CJEU case C-414/11 Daiichi Sankyo v DEMO Anonimos). The first part will explain the process of claiming patents at the national as well as the European level in order to understand the complexity of patent law, the second part will deal with the implications of jurisdiction and developments in EU patent regulations, the third part will deal with the effects of EU competence over the TRIPS patent provisions and the forth part will deal with the interpretation of substantive patent law in the light of the Daiichi Sankyo case.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • • Aerts Rob J., 2014, ‘The Patenting of Biotechnological Inventions in the EU, the Judicial Bodies Involved and the Objectives of the EU Legislator’, European Intellectual Property Review, XXXVI(2): 88-94.

  • • Appleton Arthur and Plummer Michael, 2005, The World Trade Organization: Legal, Economic and Political Analysis, Vol I, Springer Science.

  • • Bender Gretchen Ann, 2000, ‘Clash of the Titans: The Territoriality of Patent Law vs. The European Union’, IDEA: The Journal of Law and Technology, XL(1): 49-82.

  • • Cook Trevor, 2012, ‘Has an Agreement been Reached on a Unitary Patent and a Unified Patent Court for Europe and if so what is It?’, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, XVII(6): 568-572.

  • • Dashwood Alan, Illion Christopher, Spencer John and Ward Angela, 2001, The Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies, Hart Publishing, Oxford.

  • • Dimopoulus Angelos and Vantsiouri Petroula, 2012, ‘The Interpretative Jurisdiction of the Court of Justice of the EU over Patent Law’, Tilburg University TILEC discussion paper.

  • • Van Engelen Thomas, 2010, ‘Jurisdiction and Applicable Law in Matters of Intellectual Property’, Electronic Journal of Comparative Law, XIV(3), at

  • • Geiger Cristophe, 2013, Constructing European Intellectual Property: Achievements and New Perspectives, Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham.

  • • Herwig C.H., Rowe Gerard and Türk Alexander, 2011, Administrative Law and Policy of the European Union, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

  • • Luginbuehl Stefan, 2011, European Patent Law: Towards A Uniform Interpretation, Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham.

  • • Mateu Catherine, 2014, International Organization for the Protection of Intellectual Property (AIPPI) newsletter no. 3.

  • • Mayss Abla and Reed Alan, 1998, European Business Litigation, Dartmouth & Ashgate, Aldershot & Surrey.

  • • Mylly Tuomas, 2014, Constitutional Functions of the EU´s Intellectual Property Treaties, Springer-Verlag, Berlin and Heidelberg.

  • • Podbielski Yvonne, 2012, EPO Boards of Appeal and Key Decisions, The Appeal Procedure from A to Z (Part 1 of 3), European Patent Office, Munich.

  • • Scotchmer Suzanne, 2004, ‘The Political Economicy of Intellectual Property Treaties, Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, XX(2): 415-437.

  • • Starus Joseph, 1996, ‘The Present State of the Patent System in the EU, Copyright and Competition Law, Max Planck Institute for Foreign and International Patent, Munich Germany.

  • • Steinberger Eva, 2006, ‘The WTO Treaty as a Mixed Agreement: Problems with the EC’s and the EC Member States’ Membership of the WTO’, European Journal of International Law, XVII(4): 837-862

  • • Thomas Philip and Proctor Tony, ‘EPO Oppositions: A Cost-Effective Alternative to Litigation’, World IP Review, at

  • • Webster Elizabeth, Jensen Paul and Palangkaraya Alfons, 2014, ‘Patent Examination Outcomes and the National Treatment Principle’, The Rand Journal of Economics, XLV(2): 449-469.

  • • Zekos Georgios I., 2006, ‘Software Patenting’, The Journal of World Intellectual Property, IX(4): 426-444.

  • • CJEU, Case C-274/11 Kingdom of Spain and Italian Republic v Council of the European Union, 2013.

  • • CJEU, Case C-4/03, Gesellschaft für Antriebstechnik v Lamellen und Kupplungsbau Beteiligungs KG, 2006.

  • • CJEU, Case C-539/03, Roche Nederland BV v Primus, 2006

  • • CJEU, Case C-616/10, Solvay v Honeywell, 2012.

  • • CJEU, Case C-4/03, GAT v LUK, 2006.

  • • CJEU, Case C-414/11, Daiichi Sankyo Co. Ltd Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH v DEMO Anonimos Viomikhaniki kai Emporiki Etairia Farmakon, 2013.

  • • CJEU, Case-431/05, Merck Genericos v Merck & Co. Inc.-Merck Sharp & Dohme Ltdª, 2007.

  • • CJEU, Case C-300/98 and C-392/98 Parfums Christian Dior SA v Tuk Consultancy, 2000.

  • • EPO, Case T 1099/06 - 3.3.08, Max-Planck-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der Wissenschaften e.V. vs BASF Plant Science GmbH, 2008.

  • • CJEU, Case C-187/89, Athanasios Kalfelis v Bankhaus Schröder, Münchmeyer, Hengst and Co. and others,1988.

  • • CJEU, Case C-24/67, Parke Davis v Probel, 1968.

  • • CJEU, Case C-239/03 Commission v French Republic, 2004.

  • • CJEU, Case C-69/89 Nakajima All v Council, 1991.

  • • CJEU Case C-53/96, Hermes v FHT Marketing, 1998.

  • • CJEU Case C-70/87 Fédération de l'industrie de l'huilerie de la CEE (Fediol) v Commission of the European Communities, 1989.

  • • CJEU Case C-120/06 P and C-121/06 P FIAMM and Fedon v Council and others, 2008

  • • Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, C-364/3, Journal of the European Union, 18.12.2000.

  • • Consolidated version of the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Official Journal of the European Union, 2012/C 326/01.

  • • Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property, 20 March 1883.

  • • TRIPS Agreement, Annex 1C of the Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the WTO, Morocco 15 April 1994.

  • • European Patent Convention, signed 5 October 1973.

  • • Patent Cooperation Treaty, signed 19 June 1970.

  • • Strasbourg Agreement Concerning the International Patent Classification, 28 September 1979.

  • • Regulation (EC) No 864/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of on the law applicable to non-contractual obligations, Journal of the European Union, 11 July 2007.

  • • Council Regulation on Jurisdiction and the Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters, EC Nr 44/2001.

  • • Consolidated versions of the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Official Journal of the European Union, 2012/C 326/01.

  • • Directive 98/44/EC, Directive on the Legal Protection of Biotechnology Inventions, 6 July 1998.

  • • Directive 2004/48/EC on the Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights, 29 April 2004.

  • • Council Decision 94/800/EC, 22 December 1994 concerning the conclusion on behalf of the European Community, as regards matters within its competence, of the agreements reached in the Uruguay Round multilateral negotiations (1986-1994).

  • • Opinion of the Court of 15 November 1994. - Competence of the Community to conclude international agreements concerning services and the protection of intellectual property, European Court Reports 1994 I-05267.

  • • Communication on global Europe: competing in the world. A contribution to the EU’s growth and jobs strategy, of 4 October 2006, COM (2006) 567 final.

  • • Intellectual property rights intensive industries: contribution to economic performance and employment in the European Union, Industry-Level Analysis Report, Joint project between the European Patent Office and the Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market, Munich and Alicante, 2013.

  • • A Single Market for European Intellectual Property Rights, COM 2011, 287 final, 2011.


Journal + Issues