Sub-national constitutional politics: contesting or complementing, replicating or innovating, traditional constitutionalism?

Open access

Abstract

This special issue of Perspectives on Federalism collects papers mostly presented at the General Conference of the European Consortium of Political Research in September 2014. The issue contains five papers dealing with the role, the status, the dynamics, and the functions of sub-national constitutional politics and sub-national constitutionalism in a number of member states of the EU as well as in a comparative, non-EU perspective. Even though the papers take different perspectives on the topic at hand, they all engage with the contribution sub-national constitutions can make to democracy and the nationstate within as well as outside of Europe.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Adams Douglas 2005 Life the Universe and Everything [1982] Del Rey New York.

  • Benz Arthur 2009 ‘Ein gordischer Koten der Politikwssenschaft? Zur Vereinbarkeit von Föderalismus und Demokratie’ Politische Vierteljahresschrift L(1): 3-22.

  • Blokker Paul 2012 ‘The Constitutional Premises of Subnational Self-Government in New Democracies’ Corvinus Journal of Sociology and Social Policy.

  • Böckenförde Ernst-Wolfgang 1992 ‘Geschichtliche Entwicklung und Bedeutungswandel der Verfassung’ in Ernst-Wolfgang Böckenförde Staat Verfassung und Demokratie. Studien zur Verfassungstheorie und zum Verfassungsrecht. 2nd edition. Suhrkamp Frankfurt/Main 29-52.

  • Elazar Daniel J. 1987 Exploring Federalism The University of Alabama Press Tuscaloosa.

  • Gardner James A. 2007 ‘In Search of Sub-National Constitutionalism’ Paper prepared for the Seventh World Congress of the International nAssociation of Constitutional Law Athens Greece June 11-15 2007 available at: http://camlaw.rutgers.edu/statecon/workshop11greece07/workshop11/Gardner.pdf (download: July 10 2014).

  • Hamilton Alexander Madison James and Jay John 1994 Die Federalist-Artikel [1788]. Politische Theorie und Verfassungskommentar der amerikanischen Gründungsväter ed. by Angela Adams and Willi Paul Adams. Schöningh Paderborn.

  • Karlhofer Ferdinand and Pallaver Günther 2013 ‘Strength through Weakness: State Executive Power and Federal Reform in Austria’ Swiss Political Science XIX(1): 41-59.

  • Lorenz Astrid 2013 Demokratisierung in Ostdeutschland: Verfassungspolitische Weichenstellungen in den neuen Ländern und Berlin Springer VS Wiesbaden.

  • Lorenz Astrid and Reutter Werner 2012 ‘Subconstitutionalism in a Multilayered System. A Comparative Analysis of Constitutional Politics in the German Länder’ Perspectives on Federalism IV(2): 141-170 retrieved from: http://www.on-federalism.eu/attachments/141_download.pdf (download: January 10 2013).

  • Popelier Patricia 2014 ‘Subnational multilevel constitutionalism’ Perspectives on Federalism VI(2): 1-23 available at http://www.on-federalism.eu/attachments/178_download.pdf (download: November 20 2014).

  • Reutter Werner 2006 ‘The Transfer of Power Hypothesis and the German Länder: In Need of Modification’ Publius: The Journal of Federalism XXXVI(2): 277-301.

  • Reutter Werner 2010 ‘Demokratie im Bundesstaat. Zum Verhältnis zweier verfassungsrechtlicher Strukturprinzipien’ Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft XX(2): 123-148.

  • Reutter Werner 2014 'Multilevel Systems and Subnational Constitutional Politics in Germany: a Qualitative Comparative Analysis Perspectives on Federalism VI(2): 215-243.

  • Rosanvallon Pierre 2011 Democratic legitimacy: Impartiality reflexivity proximity Princeton University Press Princeton.

  • Vandenbruwaene Werner 2014 ‘What Scope for Subnational Autonomy: the Issue oft he Legal Enforcement oft he Prinicple of Subsidiarity’ Perspectives on Federalism VI(2): 45-73.

  • Williams Robert. F. 2011: ‘Teaching and Researching Comparative Subnational Constitutional Law’ Penn State Law Review CXV(4): 1109-1132.

Search
Journal information
Impact Factor


CiteScore 2018: 0.04

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.105
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.03

Target audience: researchers, academics, practitioners interested in the field of political, economic and legal issues in federal states, regional organizations, and international organizations at global level
Cited By
Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 178 94 7
PDF Downloads 116 80 1