Rights of Minors and Constitutional Politics in the German Länder. Legal Framework, Party Strategies, and Constitutional Amendments

Open access


The article analyses constitutional politics in the German Länder in the field of minors’ rights. Since this issue seems a purely legal matter dealt with at the federal, European and international level, we should expect similar, almost identically shaped policies at the Länder level. However, the analysis brings considerable variations of constitutional activities in this field to the fore: time, frequency, and contents of respective initiatives vary significantly in the period from 1999 to 2014. These variations were due to different party strategies, diverging party platforms and majority constellations in the Länder. The analysis also shows that the public arguments brought forward in favour of constitutional amendments refer only weakly and randomly to legal provisions and processes at other levels. The political debate supporting extended children's rights rather refers to general observations, to the specific regional context, and constitutional provisions in other Länder. At least with regard to this issue, the multi-level system did not systematically impact on constitutional politics in the Länder. It rather can be understood as an opportunity structure providing parties with multiple realms in which they can pursue their goals. Thus the study shows that federal and regional party strategies are key factors in explaining policy diffusion in multilevel systems.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Abromeit Heidrun 1992 Der verkappte Einheitsstaat Leske und Budrich Opladen.

  • Basic Law for the Federal Republic of Germany available at http://www.bundestag.de/htdocs_e/documents/legal.

  • Behnke Nathalie and Benz Arthur (eds) 2009 Federalism and Constitutional Change special issue of Publius. The Journal of Federalism XXXIX(2).

  • Benz Arthur 2004 ‘Path-Dependent Institutions and Strategic Veto Players - National Parliaments in the European Union’ West European Politics XXIX(5): 875-900.

  • Benz Arthur and Broschek Jörg 2013 Federal Dynamics: Continuity Change and the Varieties of Federalism Oxford University Press Oxford.

  • Benz Arthur and Colino César (eds) 2011 Federalism and Constitutional Change. Theoretical and Comparative Perspectives special issue of Regional and Federal Studies XXI(4-5).

  • Börzel Tanja A. and Risse Thomas 2012 From Europeanisation to Diffusion special issue of West European Politics XXXV(1).

  • Bräuninger Thomas and König Thomas 1999 ‘The Checks and Balances of Party Federalism’ European Journal of Political Research XXXVI(2): 207-234.

  • Braunschweig Stefan von 1993 Verfassungsentwicklung in den westlichen Ländern Centaurus Pfaffenweiler.

  • Cancik Pascale 2003 ‘Die Verfassungsentwicklung in Hessen‘ Jahrbuch des öffentlichen Rechts (Neue Folge) LI: 271-300.

  • Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (2000/C 364/01). Official Journal of the European Communities 18.12.2000.

  • Detrick Sharon A. 1999 Commentary on the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child Kluwer The Hague.

  • Dombert Matthias 2012 ‘§27 Landesverfassungen und Landesverfassungsgerichte in ihrer Bedeutung für den Föderalismus’ in Härtel Ines (ed) Handbuch Föderalismus - Föderalismus als demokratische Rechtsordnung und Rechtskultur in Deutschland Europa und der Welt vol. II Springer Heidelberg 19-37.

  • Eckstein Harry 1975 ‘Case studies and theory in political science’ in Greenstein Fred and Polsby Nelson (eds) Handbook of Political Science vol. 7 Addison-Wesley Reading MA 79-138.

  • Elkins Zachary and Ginsburg Tom 2011 ‘Comparative Constitutions Project. Database’ available at http://comparativeconstitutionsproject.org/ (accessed: 25 Aug. 2013).

  • George Alexander L. and Bennett Andrew 2005 Case studies and theory development in the social sciences MIT Press Cambridge MA.

  • Gerken Heather K. 2007 ‘The Hydraulics of Constitutional Reform: A Skeptical Response to Our Undemocratic Constitution’ in Drake Law Review LV(4): 925-951.

  • Gerring John 2007 Case study research Cambridge University Press New York.

  • Ginsburg Tom and Posner Eric A. 2010 ‘Subconstitutionalism’ Stanford Law Review LXII(6): 1583-1628.

  • Goetz Klaus H. and Meyer-Sahling Jan-Hinrik 2008 ‘The Europeanisation of national political systems: Parliaments and executives’ Living Reviews in European Governance III(2): 4-22.

  • Häberle Peter 1993 ‘Die Verfassungsbewegung in den fünf neuen Bundesländern’ Jahrbuch des öffentlichen Rechts der Gegenwart (Neue Folge) XLI: 69-92.

  • Hayo Bernd and Voigt Stefan 2013 ‘Endogenous constitutions. Politics and politicians matter economic outcomes don’t’ Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization LXXXVIII: 47-61.

  • Helms Ludger 2007 ‘Föderalismus und Bundesstaatlichkeit in Deutschland’ in Europäisches Zentrum für Föderalismus-Forschung (ed) Jahrbuch des Föderalismus 2006 Nomos Baden-Baden 115-135.

  • Hesse Konrad 1962 Der unitarische Bundesstaat Müller Karlsruhe.

  • Iusmen Ingi 2013 ‘When Good Intentions Go Astray: Policy Framing processes and the Europeanization of Children’s Rights’ The British Journal of Politics and International Relations DOI: 10.1111/1467-856X.12027.

  • Lehmbruch Gerhard 2000 Parteienwettbewerb im Bundesstaat. Regelsysteme und Spannungslagen im politischen System der Bundesrepublik Deutschland Westdeutscher Verlag Wiesbaden.

  • Lorenz Astrid 2005 ‘How to Measure Constitutional Rigidity: Four Concepts and Two Alternatives’ Journal of Theoretical Politics XVII(3): 341-363.

  • Lorenz Astrid and Reutter Werner 2012 ‘Subconstitutionalism in a Multilayered System. A Comparative Analysis of Constitutional Politics in the German Länder’ Perspectives on Federalism IV(2): 148-170 available at http://www.on-federalism.eu/attachments/141_download.pdf (download: January 10 2013).

  • Lutz Donald S. 1994 ‘Toward a Theory of Constitutional Amendment’ American Political Science Review LXXXVIII(2): 355-370.

  • Moravcsik Andrew 1997 ‘Warum die Europäische Union die Exekutive stärkt: Innenpolitik und internationale Kooperation’ in Wolf Klaus D. (ed) Projekt Europa im Übergang? Nomos Baden-Baden 211-269.

  • Putnam Robert D. 1988 ‘Diplomacy and Domestic Politics‘International Organization XLII(3): 427-460.

  • Renzsch Wolfgang 2000 ‘Bundesstaat oder Parteienstaat’ in Holtmann Everhard and Voelzkow Helmut (eds) Zwischen Wettbewerbs- und Verhandlungsdemokratie Westdeutscher Verlag Wiesbaden 53-78.

  • Roberts Andrew 2008 ‘The Politics of Constitutional Amendment in Postcommunist Europe’ Constitutional Political Economy XX(1): 99-117.

  • Robinson James A. and Torvik Ragnar 2008 Endogenous Presidentialism. Working Paper 14603 available at http://www.nber.org/papers/w14603 (accessed 16 Jan. 2015).

  • Scharpf Fritz W. Reissert Bernd and Schnabel Fritz (eds) 1976 Politikverflechtung. Theorie und Empirie des kooperativen Föderalismus in der Bundesrepublik Scriptor Königstein/Ts.

  • Schmidt Manfred G. 2007 Das politische System Deutschlands Beck München.

  • Stiens Andrea 1997 Chancen und Grenzen der Landesverfassungen im deutschen Bundesstaat der Gegenwart Duncker & Humblot Berlin.

  • Tarr G. Alan 1998 Understanding State Constitutions Princeton University Press Princeton N.J.

  • Ticchi Davide and Vindigni Andrea 2010 ‘Endogenous Constitutions’ Economic Journal CXX(543): 1-39.

  • Tsebelis George 2002 Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work Princeton University Press Princeton N.J.

  • UNICEF 2014 Convention on the Rights of the Child available at: http://www.unicef.org/crc/.

  • United Nations 1990 Convention on the Rights of the Child available at: http://www.unicef.org/crc/.

  • Vermeule Adrian 2001 ‘Veil of Ignorance Rules in Constitutional Law’ The Yale Law Journal CXI(2): 399-433.

  • Voigt Stefan 1997 ‘Positive Constitutional Economics: A Survey’ Public Choice XC(1): 11-53.

  • Voigt Stefan 1999 Explaining Constitutional Change. A Positive Economics Approach Elgar Cheltenham.

  • Weiler Joseph H.H. and Wind Marlene (eds) 2003 European Constitutionalism Beyond the State Cambridge University Press Cambridge.

  • Wiener Antje 2008 The Invisible Constitution of Politics: Contested Norms and International Encounters Cambridge University Press Cambridge.

  • Wolf Klaus D. 2000 Die neue Staatsräson Nomos Baden-Baden.

  • Woll Cornelia and Jacquot Sophie 2010 ‘Using Europe: Strategic action in multi-level politics’ Comparative European Politics VIII(1): 110-126.

Journal information
Impact Factor

CiteScore 2018: 0.04

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.105
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.03

Target audience: researchers, academics, practitioners interested in the field of political, economic and legal issues in federal states, regional organizations, and international organizations at global level
Cited By
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 201 94 7
PDF Downloads 82 52 6