Inter-parliamentary cooperation as a means for reinforcing joint scrutiny in the EU: upgrading existing mechanisms and creating new ones

Open access

Abstract

This special issue develops a contextual analysis of EU inter-parliamentary cooperation in the post Lisbon Treaty framework. Indeed, it is possible to claim that there are several sources and causes for renewed EU inter-parliamentary cooperation: first, a voluntary one, i.e. the connection with the Lisbon Treaty’s intent to facilitate a wider democratisation objective; second, this time more a reaction than an initiative, the need to counterbalance the institutional outcomes of the economic and financial crisis that shook the world but particularly the eurozone; and, third, the call for an improvement in existing rules and mechanisms to develop even further democratic (read: parliamentary) input in common policies.

The special issue analyses whether current inter-parliamentary mechanisms are suited to react to these challenges. It specifically assesses the practical impact of interparliamentary cooperation on the numerous democratic gaps that still exist in the EU's multi-layered decision-making process. Its objective is to show, beyond the mere sharing of information and the comparison of best practices at a supranational and transnational level, whether existing inter-parliamentary practices contribute to joint parliamentary scrutiny by involving both the EP and the national parliaments of EU member states.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • • Abels Gabriele and Eppler Annegret (eds) 2016 Subnational parliaments in the EU multi-level parliamentary system: taking stock of the post-Lisbon era Studienverlag Innsbruck.

  • • Auel Katrin 2007 ‘Democratic Accountability and National Parliaments: Redefining the Impact of Parliamentary Scrutiny in EU affairs’ European Law Journal XIII(4): 487-504.

  • • Auel Katrin and Christiansen Thomas 2015 ‘After Lisbon: National Parliaments in the European West European Politics XXXVIII(2): 261-281.

  • • Auel Katrin and Neuhold Christine 2017 ‘Multi-arena players in the making? Conceptualizing the role of national parliaments since the Lisbon Treaty’ Journal of European Public Policy XXIV(10): 1547-1561.

  • • Barón Crespo Enrique 2012 ‘Parliamentary democracy and the Treaty of Lisbon’ OPAL Online Paper no. 1.

  • • Bertoncini Yves 2017 Differentiated Integration and the EU: a Variable Geometry Legitimacy IAI Rome March 2017: 1-16.

  • • Besselink Leonard 2007 A Composite European Constitution Europa Law Publishing Groningen.

  • • Bolleyer Nicole 2017 ‘Executive-legislative relations and inter-parliamentary cooperation in federal systems – lessons for the European Union’ Journal of European Public Policy XXIV(4): 520-543.

  • • Brack Nathalie 2015 ‘The roles of Eurosceptic Members of the European Parliament and their implications for the EU’ International Political Science Review XXXVI(3): 337–350.

  • • Butler Graham 2015 ‘The Interparliamentary Conference on CFSP/CSDP: A new forum for the Oireachtas in Irish and EU foreign policy?’ Irish Studies in International Affairs XXVI: 163-186.

  • • Chryssochoou Dimitris 1998 Democracy in the European Union Tauris London.

  • • Cooper Ian 2012 ‘A ‘Virtual Third Chamber’ for the European Union? National Parliaments after the Treaty of Lisbon’ West European Politics XXXV(3): 441-465.

  • • Cooper Ian 2014 ‘Parliamentary oversight of the EU after the crisis: on the creation of the ‘Article 13’ Inter-parliamentary Conference’ Luiss School of Government Working paper Series no. 21: 1-30 www.sog.luiss.it.

  • • Cooper Ian 2017 ‘The Emerging Order of Interparliamentary Cooperation in the EU: Functional Specialization the EU Speakers Conference and the Parliamentary Dimension of the Council Presidency’ European University Institute Working Papers RSCAS 2017/05: 1-18.

  • • Crum Ben and Curtin Deirdre 2015 ‘The challenge of making European Union Executive Power Accountable’ in Piattoni Simona (ed) The European Union: Democratic Principles and Institutional Architectures in Times of Crisis Oxford University Press Oxford 63-87.

  • • Crum Ben and Fossum John Erik (eds) 2013 Practices of interparliamentary coordination in international politics the European Union and beyond ECPR Press Colchester.

  • • Curtin Deirdre 2014 ‘Challenging Executive Dominance in European Democracy’ The Modern Law Review LXXVII(1): 1-32.

  • • Cygan Adam 2017 ‘Legal Implications of Economic Governance for National Parliaments’ Parliamentary Affairs LXX(4): 710-727.

  • • Dawson Mark 2015 ‘The Legal and Political Accountability Structure of ‘Post-Crisis’ EU Economic Governance’ Journal of Common Market Studies LIII(5): 976-993.

  • • Esposito Antonio 2014 ‘La cooperazione interparlamentare: principi strumenti e prospettive’ in Lupo Nicola and Manzella Andrea (eds) Il sistema parlamentare euro-nazionale Giappichelli Torino 133-182-

  • • Fromage Diane 2016 ‘Increasing Interparliamentary cooperation in the EU: Current Trends and Challenges’ European Public Law XXII(4): 749-772.

  • • Griglio Elena and Lupo Nicola 2014 ‘Towards an asymmetric European Union without an asymmetric European Parliament’ LUISS Guido Carli School of Government Working Paper no. 20: 1-44.

  • • Hefftler Claudia and Gattermann Katjana 2015 ‘Interparliamentary Cooperation in the European Union: Patterns Problems and Potential’ in Hefftler Claudia Neuhold Christine Rozenberg Olivier and Smith Julie (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of National Parliaments and the European Union Palgrave London 94-115.

  • • Herranz-Surrallés Anna 2014 ‘The EU’s Multilevel Parliamentary (Battle)Field: Inter-Parliamentary Cooperation and Conflict in Foreign and Security Policy’ (2014) West European Politics 957-975.

  • • Hix Simon and Follesdal Andreas 2006 ‘Why There Is a Democratic Deficit and the EU: A Response to Majone and Moravcsik’ Journal of Common Market Studies XLIV(3): 533-562.

  • • Högenauer Anna-Lena Neuhold Christine and Christiansen Thomas 2016 Parliamentary Administrations in the European Union Palgrave Macmillan London.

  • • Innerarity Daniel 2017 La democracia en Europa - Una filosofía política de la Unión Europea Galaxia Gutenberg Barcelona.

  • • Jančić Davor (ed) 2017 National Parliaments after the Lisbon Treaty and the Euro Crisis: Resilience or Resignation Oxford University Press Oxford.

  • • Knutelská Viera 2013 ‘Cooperation among national parliaments: an effective contribution to EU legitimation?’ in Crum Ben and Fossum John Erik (eds) Practices of interparliamentary coordination in international politics. The European Union and beyond ECPR Press Colchester 33-48.

  • • Kreilinger Valentin 2013 ‘The new inter-parliamentary conference for economic and financial governance’ Notre Europe Jacques Delors Institute Policy Paper.

  • • Lindseth Peter 2010 Power and Legitimacy: Reconciling Europe and the Nation-State Oxford University Press Oxford.

  • • Lupo Nicola and Fasone Cristina (eds) 2016 Interparliamentary cooperation in the composite European Constitution Hart Publishing Oxford.

  • • Lupo Nicola and Griglio Elena 2018 ‘The Conference on Stability Economic Coordination and Governance: Filling the Gaps of Parliamentary Oversight in the EU’ Journal of European Integration XL(3): 358-373.

  • • Manzella Andrea and Lupo Nicola (eds) 2014 Il sistema parlamentare euro-nazionale. Lezioni Giappichelli Torino.

  • • Micossi Stefano 2008 ‘Democracy in the European Union’ CEPS Working Document no. 286 (www.ceps.eu):1-19.

  • • Moravcsik Andrew 2004 ‘Is there a “Democratic Deficit” in World Politics? A Framework for Analysis’ Government and Opposition XXXIX(2): 336-363.

  • • O’Brennan John and Raunio Tapio 2007 ‘Conclusion: National Parliaments gradually learning to play the European game’ in O’ Brennan and Raunio (eds) National Parliaments within the enlarged European Union: from victims of integration to competitive actors? Routledge Oxon/New York 272-286.

  • • Raunio Tapio 2009 ‘National Parliaments and European Integration: What We Know and Agenda for Future Research’ The Journal of Legislative Studies XV(4): 317-334.

  • • Rittberger Berthold 2005 Building Europe’s Parliament: Democratic Representation beyond Nation-State Oxford University Press Oxford.

  • • Rittberger Berthold 2007 ‘Constructing parliamentary democracy in the European Union: how did it happen?’ in Kohler-Koch Beate and Rittberger Berthold (eds) Debating the Democratic Legitimacy of the European Union Rowman & Littlefield Publishers Lanham 111-137.

  • • Schäfer Axel and Schulz Fabian 2013 A Conference of Parliaments of Europe – New Ways of Interparliamentary Cooperation Friedrich Ebert Stiftung Perspective April 2013: 1-4.

  • • Stavridis Stelios and Jančić Davor (eds) 2016 Special issue ‘Parliamentary Diplomacy Uncovered: European and Global Perspectives’ The Hague Journal of Diplomacy XI(2-3).

  • • Stavridis Stelios 2017 ‘Conclusions: Parliamentary Diplomacy as a Global Phenomenon’ in Stavridis Stelios and Jancic Davor (eds) Parliamentary Diplomacy in European and Global Governance Brill Nijhoff Leiden/Boston 368-387.

  • • Vasilopoulou Sofia 2013 ‘Continuity and Change in the Study of Euroscepticism: Plus ça change?’ Journal of Common Market Studies LI(1): 153–168.

  • • Warleigh Alex 2003 Democracy in the European Union Sage London.

  • • Wessels Wolfgang 2013 ‘National Parliaments and the EP in Multi-Tier Governance: in Search for an Optimal Multi-level Parliamentary Architecture’ in Pernice Ingolf et al (eds) Challenges of Multi-tier Governance in the European Union European Parliament – Directorate General for Internal Policies Brussels 95-110.

  • • Winzen Thomas et al 2015 ‘Parliamentary co-evolution: national parliamentary reactions to the empowerment of the European Parliament’ Journal of European Public Policy XX(1): 75-93.

  • • Wouters Jan and Raube Kolja 2012 ‘Europe’s Common Security and Defence Policy: The Case for Inter-Parliamentary Scrutiny’ Leuven Centre for Global Governance Studies Working Paper no. 90.

Search
Journal information
Impact Factor


CiteScore 2018: 0.04

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.105
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.03

Target audience: researchers, academics, practitioners interested in the field of political, economic and legal issues in federal states, regional organizations, and international organizations at global level
Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 18 18 6
PDF Downloads 16 16 3