Environmental protection and sustainable development are competences that the EU is entitled to integrate into the definition and implementation of its policies. However, shared competences in these areas are still a reality, as a margin of discretion persists for Member States, aimed at maintaining a high level of decentralisation, particularly where issues related to national policies and more (nation) specific sectoral legislation are concerned. This paper intends to analyse the application of the principle of subsidiarity to environmental issues within the EU, to examine the characteristics of a possible path to the future of green federalism in Europe.
If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.
• Adelman David E. 2014 ‘Environmental Federalism When Numbers Matter More than Size’ UCLA Journal of Environmental Law & Policy XXXII(2).
• Arnold Craig Anthony (Tony) and Gunderson Lance H. 2014 ‘Adaptive Law’ in Garmestani Ahjond S. and Allen Craig R. (eds) Social-Ecological Resilience and Law Columbia University Press New York 317-364.
• Arribas Gracia Vara and Bourdin Delphine 2012 ‘What Does the Lisbon Treaty Change Regarding Subsidiarity within the EU Institutional Framework?’ Eipascope Bulletin No 2012/02 European Institute of Public Administration. Available at: http://www.eipa.eu/files/repository/eipascope/20130117091515_Eipascope2012_2web.pdf (retrieved on October 7 2018).
• Barnard Catherine and Peers Steve 2014 European Union Law Oxford University Press Oxford.
• Bell Stuart McGillivray Donald and Pedersen Ole W. 2013 Environmental Law 8th ed. Oxford University Press Oxford.
• Van den Bergh Roger Faure Michael and Lefevere Jurgen 1996 ‘The Subsidiarity Principle in European Environmental Law: An Economic Analysis’ in Eide Ehrling and Van den Bergh Roger (eds) Law and Economics of the Environment Juridisk Forlag Oslo 121-166.
• Chakrabarti P.G. Dhar and Srivastava Nidhi 2015 Green Federalism: Experiences and Practices The Energy and Resources Institute and Forum of Federations Ottawa.
• Cosens A. Cosens Craig Robin K. Hirsch Shana Lee Arnold Craig Anthony (Tony) Benson Melinda H. DeCaro Daniel A. Garmestani Ahjond S. Gosnell Hannah Ruhl J.B. and Schlager Edella 2017 ‘The role of law in adaptive governance’ Ecology and Society XXII(1): 1-30.
• Faure Michael G. and Johnston Jason Scott 2009 ‘The Law and Economics of Environmental Federalism: Europe and the United States Compared’ Virginia Environmental Law Journal XXVII(3): 205-274.
• Gottlieb Robert 1993 Forcing the Spring: The Transformation of the American Environmental Movement Island Press Washington D.C..
• Holzinger Katharina Knill Christoph and Schäfer Ansgar 2006 ‘Rhetoric or Reality? “New Governance” in EU Environmental Policy’ European Law Journal XII(3): 403-420.
• Jans Jan and Vedder Hans 2012 European Environmental Law: After Lisbon Europa Law Publishing Groningen.
• Kohler-Koch Beate and Eising Rainer (eds) 1999 The Transformation of Governance in the European Union Routledge London and New York.
• Kong Hoi L. 2015 ‘Subsidiarity Republicanism and the Division of Powers in Canada’ Revue de droit de l’Université de Sherbrooke (RDUS) XLV: 13-46.
• Krämer Ludwig 2002 ‘Thirty Years of EC Environmental Law: Perspectives and Perspectives’ The Yearbook of European Environmental Law II: 155-182.
• Krämer Ludwig 2004 ‘The Routes of Divergence: A European Perspective’ in Vig Norman J. and Faure Michael G. (eds) Green Giants? Environmental Policies of the United States and the European Union MIT Press Cambridge MA and London.
• Krämer Ludwig 2012 EU Environmental Law Sweet & Maxwell London.
• Langlet David and Mahmoudi Said 2016 EU Environmental Law and Policy Oxford University Press Oxford.
• Lenaerts Koen 1993 ‘The Principle of Subsidiarity and the Environment in the European Union: Keeping the Balance of Federalism’ Fordham International Law Journal XVII(4): 846-895.
• Martella Roger and Francke Glory 2012 ‘Federalism in European Environmental Decision Making’ Natural Resources & Environment XXVII(1): 1-6.
• Sadeleer Nicolas de 2012 ‘Particularités de la subsidiarité dans le domaine de l’environnement’ Droit et Société no. 80: 73-90.
• Taylor Greg 2006 ‘Germany: The subsidiarity principle’ International Journal of Constitutional Law IV(1): 115-130.
• Vogel David Toffel Michael Post Diahanna and Aragon Nazli Z. Uludere 2010 ‘Environmental Federalism in the European Union and the United States’ Working Paper 10-085 Harvard Business School. Available at: http://www.hbs.edu/faculty/Publication%20Files/10-085.pdf (retrieved on October 7 2018).
• Volpi Giulio and Singer Stephan 2000 Will Voluntary Agreements at EU Level Deliver on Environmental Objectives? Lessons from the Agreement with the Automotive Industry WWF Discussion Paper.
• van Zeben Josephine 2014 ‘Subsidiarity in European Environmental Law: A Competence Allocation Approach’ Harvard Environmental Law Review XXXVIII(2): 415-464. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2791617 (retrieved on October 7 2018).
SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.105 Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.03
researchers, academics, practitioners interested in the field of political, economic and legal issues in federal states, regional organizations, and international organizations at global level