When ethnic groups negotiate self-government arrangements, ‘ethnic sovereignty’ lies boldly at the heart of their security considerations. The constitutional nature of self-determination and the extent of territorial control can determine the degree of ethno-territorial sovereignty attributed to groups. However, in competitive contexts influenced by fear and mistrust, groups interpret these pillar elements in ways that increase their own sense of security. The present study argues that legal and political positions on sovereignty in Cyprus are largely built around the competitive security assumptions held by the Greek and Turkish Cypriot leaderships, and explains how the divergent viewpoints and understandings of sovereignty reflect the underlying security fears and suspicion of parties. The analysis finds that the two ethnic leaderships in Cyprus have sought to accumulate a distinct ‘sovereignty capital’ in an effort to safeguard their own and overpower each other’s perceived security intentions in the event of federal collapse, making thus the attainment of settlement in Cyprus particularly elusive.
If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.
• Alen André & Peeters Patrick., 1998, ‘Federal Belgium within the International Legal Order: Theory and Practice’, in Wellens Karel (ed), International Law: Theory and Practice, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Hague, 122-124.
• Anderson Liam D., 2014, ‘Ethnofederalism: The Worst Form of Institutional Arrangement…?’, International Security, XXXIX, (1): 165-204.
• Berg Eiki, 2007, ‘Examining power-sharing in persistent conflicts: De Facto Pseudo-statehood versus de Jure Quasi-federalism’, Global Society, XXI (2): 199-217.
• Berg, Eiki, 2009, ‘Re-Examining Sovereignty Claims in Changing Territorialities: Reflections from ‘Kosovo Syndrome’, Geopolitics. XIV (2): 219-234.
• Booth Ken & Wheeler Nicholas., 2008, The security dilemma: fear, cooperation and trust in world politics, Palgrave, Basingstoke.
• Brownlie Ian., 2010, Principles of Public International Law, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
• Buchanan Allen, 1997. ‘Self-Determination, Secession, and the Rule of Law’, in McKim Robert and McMahan Jeff (eds), The Morality of Nationalism, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 301-314.
• Burgess Michael, 2007, ‘What needs to be done? Bicommunalism, Federation and Confederation in Cyprus’, in Burgess Michael & Pinder John (eds), Multinational Federations, Routledge, London, 127-149.
• Butt Ahsan I., 2011, ‘Goodbye or See You Later: Why States Fight Some Secessionists but Not Others’, APSA 2011 Annual Meeting paper: 1-47.
• Constantinides Aristoteles & Christakis Theodore, 2017, ‘Territorial Disputes in the Context of Secessionist Conflicts’, in Kohen Marcelo & Hebie Mamadou (eds), Research Handbook on Territorial Disputes in International Law, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, 1-48. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2927644.
• Cornell Svante E., 2002, ‘Autonomy as a Source of Conflict: Caucasian Conflicts in Theoretical Perspective’, World Politics, LIV (2): 245-276.
• Crawford James, 2006, The Creation of States in International Law, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
• Del Mar Katherine, 2013, ‘The myth of Remedial Secession’, in French Duncan, Statehood and Self-Determination Reconciling Tradition and Modernity in International Law, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 79-108.
• Ergün, Olgun M. & Dirk Rochtus, 2008, ‘Cyprus: The Belgian ‘Tool Box’ Revisited’, Insight Turkey, X (4): 111-134.
• Erhürman Tufan, 2010. ‘New Set of Negotiations in the Cyprus Problem: Federation for a Stable Democracy’, Ankarabarreview, III(1): 35-41.
• Fitzmaurice Gerald, 1958, ‘Third Report on the Law of Treaties, Yearbook International Law Commission’, II, United Nations.
• Gudelevičiūtė Vita, 2005, ‘Does the Principle of self Determination Prevail over the Principle of Territorial Integrity?’, International Journal of Baltic Law, II(2): 48-74.
• Hernadez Gleider I., 2013, ‘Federated Entities in International Law: Disaggregating the Federal State?’, in French Duncan (ed), Statehood and Self-Determination: Reconciling Tradition and Modernity in International Law, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 491-512.
• Héraud Guy, 1963, L’ Europe des ethnies, Presses d’Europe, Nice.
• International Crisis Group, 2014, ‘Divide Cyprus: Coming to terms on an imperfect reality’, ICG Europe Report No. 229: 1-43.
• Kurtulus Ersun, 2005. State Sovereignty: Concept, Phenomenon and Ramifications, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke.
• Leigh Monroe, 1990, ‘The Legal Status in International Law of Turkish Cypriot and the Greek Cypriot Communities in Cyprus’, in Ertekün Necati Münir (1997) (eds), The Status of the Two Peoples in Cyprus: Legal Opinions, 2nd ed., Okman Ltd., Lefkosa, 54-68. Available at: http://www.mfa.gov.tr/chapter5.en.mfa.
• Mavrogiannis Andreas, 2016, ‘Greek Cypriot Chief Negotiator Presentation at the Democratic Party Conference on the Cyprus Question in Nicosia’, (Author’s notes).
• McEvoy Joanne & O’Leary Brendan (eds), 2003, Power Sharing in Deeply Divided Places, University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia.
• Moore Adam, 2016, ‘Ethno-territoriality and ethnic conflict’, Geographical Review, CVI (1): 92-108.
• Murphy Alexander, 1996, ‘The Sovereign State System as Political Territorial Ideal’, in Biersteker Thomas and Weber Cynthia (eds), State Sovereignty as Social Construct, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge UK, 81-120.
• Pavković Alexander & Radan Peter, 2007, Creating New states: Theory and Practice of Secession, Ashgate Publishing, Ltd., Farnham.
• Putnam Linda & Wondolleck Julia M., 2003, ‘Intractability: Definition, Dimensions, and Distinctions’, in Lewicki Roy, Gray Barbara and Elliott Michael (eds), ‘Making Sense of Intractable Environmental Conflicts: Concepts and Cases’, Island Press, Washington DC, 39-59.
• Richmond Oliver, 1999, ‘Ethno-nationalism, sovereignty and negotiating positions in the Cyprus conflict: obstacles to a settlement’, Middle Eastern Studies, XXXV(3): 45-63.
• Roe Paul, 1999, ‘The intrastate security dilemma: Ethnic conflict as a ‘tragedy?’, Journal of Peace Research, XXXVI(2): 183-202.
• Roeder Philip, 2009, ‘Ethnofederalism and the Mismanagement of Conflicting Nationalisms’, Regional and Federal Studies, XIX(2): 203-219.
• Rose William, 2000, ‘The security dilemma and ethnic conflict: Some new hypotheses’, Security Studies, IX: 1-51.
• Rusinow Dennison I. 1981, The Cyprus Deadlock: Forever or another Day?, American Universities Field Staff, Hanover, NH.
• Sack Robert, 1986, Human Territoriality: Its Theory and History, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
• Saideman Stephen M. & Zahar Marie-Joelle (eds), 2008, Intra-State conflict, governments and security: Dilemmas of deterrence and assurance, Routledge, London.
• Shaw Malcolm, 2003, International Law, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
• Snyder Jack & Jervis Robert, 1999, ‘Civil war and the security dilemma’, in Walter Barbara & Snyder Jack (eds), Civil wars, insecurity, and intervention, Columbia University Press, New York, 15-37.
• Steinberger Helmut, 1967, ‘Constitutional subdivisions of states or unions and their capacity to conclude treaties, Comments on Art. 5.2 Para. 2 of the ILC’s 1966 Draft Articles on the law of the treaties’, Zeitschrift für Ausländisches Offentliches Recht und Völkerrecht, XXVII: 411-428.
• Storey David, 2001, Territory: The Claiming of Space, Pearson and Prentice Hall, Harlow.
• Soysal Mümtaz, 1999, ‘A solution for Cyprus through Statehood’, Journal of International Affairs, IV(3): 1-7.
• Sözen, Ahmet, and Kudret Özersay. 2006, ‘The Annan Plan: State Succession or Continuity’, Middle Eastern Studies, XLIII(1): 125-141.
• Tocci Natalie & Kovziridze Tamara, 2004, ‘Europeanization and Conflict Resolution: Case Studies from the European Peripher’, JEMIE - Journal on Ethnopolitics and Minority Issues in Europe, I: 1-35.
• Toft Monica, 2001, ‘Indivisible Territory and Ethnic War’, Paper No. 1. Weatherhead Center for International Affairs, Harvard University: 1-46.
• Visone Tommaso, 2018, ‘Eurosceptic Federalism: Paradoxes and Relevance of a long-running Critique of European Integration’, Perspectives on Federalism, X(1): 26-40.
• Wolff Stefan, 2010, ‘Approaches to Conflict Resolution in Divided Societies: The Many Uses of Territorial Self-Governance’, Ethnopolitics Papers, V: 1-38.
• Wouters Jan & De Smet Leen, 2001, ‘The Legal Position of Federal States and their Federated Entities in International Relations - The Case of Belgium’, Institute for International Law K.U. Leuven Working Paper No 7: 1-32.