Bi-Ethnic Federalism and the Question of Sovereignty: Understanding the Competitive Security Postures in Cyprus

Open access

Abstract

When ethnic groups negotiate self-government arrangements, ‘ethnic sovereignty’ lies boldly at the heart of their security considerations. The constitutional nature of self-determination and the extent of territorial control can determine the degree of ethno-territorial sovereignty attributed to groups. However, in competitive contexts influenced by fear and mistrust, groups interpret these pillar elements in ways that increase their own sense of security. The present study argues that legal and political positions on sovereignty in Cyprus are largely built around the competitive security assumptions held by the Greek and Turkish Cypriot leaderships, and explains how the divergent viewpoints and understandings of sovereignty reflect the underlying security fears and suspicion of parties. The analysis finds that the two ethnic leaderships in Cyprus have sought to accumulate a distinct ‘sovereignty capital’ in an effort to safeguard their own and overpower each other’s perceived security intentions in the event of federal collapse, making thus the attainment of settlement in Cyprus particularly elusive.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • • Alen André & Peeters Patrick. 1998 ‘Federal Belgium within the International Legal Order: Theory and Practice’ in Wellens Karel (ed) International Law: Theory and Practice Martinus Nijhoff Publishers Hague 122-124.

  • • Anderson Liam D. 2014 ‘Ethnofederalism: The Worst Form of Institutional Arrangement…?’ International Security XXXIX (1): 165-204.

  • • Anastasiades Nikos 2016 ‘President of the Republic of Cyprus Parliamentary Speech on the Resolution of the Cyprus Question’ Politis Newspaper 11 February 2016. Available at: http://www.politis-news.com/cgibin/hweb?-A=315626&-V=articles.

  • • Berg Eiki 2007 ‘Examining power-sharing in persistent conflicts: De Facto Pseudo-statehood versus de Jure Quasi-federalism’ Global Society XXI (2): 199-217.

  • • Berg Eiki 2009 ‘Re-Examining Sovereignty Claims in Changing Territorialities: Reflections from ‘Kosovo Syndrome’ Geopolitics. XIV (2): 219-234.

  • • Booth Ken & Wheeler Nicholas. 2008 The security dilemma: fear cooperation and trust in world politics Palgrave Basingstoke.

  • • Brownlie Ian. 2010 Principles of Public International Law Clarendon Press Oxford.

  • • Buchanan Allen 1997. ‘Self-Determination Secession and the Rule of Law’ in McKim Robert and McMahan Jeff (eds) The Morality of Nationalism Oxford University Press Oxford 301-314.

  • • Burgess Michael 2007 ‘What needs to be done? Bicommunalism Federation and Confederation in Cyprus’ in Burgess Michael & Pinder John (eds) Multinational Federations Routledge London 127-149.

  • • Butt Ahsan I. 2011 ‘Goodbye or See You Later: Why States Fight Some Secessionists but Not Others’ APSA 2011 Annual Meeting paper: 1-47.

  • • Constantinides Aristoteles & Christakis Theodore 2017 ‘Territorial Disputes in the Context of Secessionist Conflicts’ in Kohen Marcelo & Hebie Mamadou (eds) Research Handbook on Territorial Disputes in International Law Edward Elgar Publishing Cheltenham 1-48. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2927644.

  • • Cornell Svante E. 2002 ‘Autonomy as a Source of Conflict: Caucasian Conflicts in Theoretical Perspective’ World Politics LIV (2): 245-276.

  • • Crawford James 2006 The Creation of States in International Law Clarendon Press Oxford.

  • • Del Mar Katherine 2013 ‘The myth of Remedial Secession’ in French Duncan Statehood and Self-Determination Reconciling Tradition and Modernity in International Law Cambridge University Press Cambridge 79-108.

  • • Ergün Olgun M. & Dirk Rochtus 2008 ‘Cyprus: The Belgian ‘Tool Box’ Revisited’ Insight Turkey X (4): 111-134.

  • • Erhürman Tufan 2010. ‘New Set of Negotiations in the Cyprus Problem: Federation for a Stable Democracy’ Ankarabarreview III(1): 35-41.

  • • Fitzmaurice Gerald 1958 ‘Third Report on the Law of Treaties Yearbook International Law Commission’ II United Nations.

  • • Gudelevičiūtė Vita 2005 ‘Does the Principle of self Determination Prevail over the Principle of Territorial Integrity?’ International Journal of Baltic Law II(2): 48-74.

  • • Hernadez Gleider I. 2013 ‘Federated Entities in International Law: Disaggregating the Federal State?’ in French Duncan (ed) Statehood and Self-Determination: Reconciling Tradition and Modernity in International Law Oxford University Press Oxford 491-512.

  • • Héraud Guy 1963 L’ Europe des ethnies Presses d’Europe Nice.

  • • International Crisis Group 2014 ‘Divide Cyprus: Coming to terms on an imperfect reality’ ICG Europe Report No. 229: 1-43.

  • • ‘ICJ Hears further Kosovo arguments’: Balkan Insight 2 December 2009. Available at: http://www.balkaninsight.com/en/article/icj-hears-further-kosovo-arguments.

  • • Kelsen Hans 2003 Principles of International Law Law Book Exchange New Jersey.

  • • Ker-Lindsay James 2011 The Cyprus problem: What everyone needs to know Oxford University Press Oxford.

  • • Koktsidis Pavlos I. 2017 ‘Negotiating Under the Security Dilemma: A Loss-Framed Approach to the Question of Cyprus’ Journal of Peace and Conflict Studies XXIV (1): 1-31.

  • • Kovziridze Tamara 2008 Hierarchy and Interdependence in Multi-level Structures: Foreign and European Relations of Belgian German and Austrian Federated Entities Vubress Brussels.

  • • Krasner Stephen 1999 Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy Princeton University Press Princeton NJ.

  • • Kurtulus Ersun 2005. State Sovereignty: Concept Phenomenon and Ramifications Palgrave Macmillan Basingstoke.

  • • Leigh Monroe 1990 ‘The Legal Status in International Law of Turkish Cypriot and the Greek Cypriot Communities in Cyprus’ in Ertekün Necati Münir (1997) (eds) The Status of the Two Peoples in Cyprus: Legal Opinions 2nd ed. Okman Ltd. Lefkosa 54-68. Available at: http://www.mfa.gov.tr/chapter5.en.mfa.

  • • Mavrogiannis Andreas 2016 ‘Greek Cypriot Chief Negotiator Presentation at the Democratic Party Conference on the Cyprus Question in Nicosia’ (Author’s notes).

  • • McEvoy Joanne & O’Leary Brendan (eds) 2003 Power Sharing in Deeply Divided Places University of Pennsylvania Press Philadelphia.

  • • Moore Adam 2016 ‘Ethno-territoriality and ethnic conflict’ Geographical Review CVI (1): 92-108.

  • • Morelli Vincent 2017 ‘Cyprus: Reunification Proving Elusive’ Congressional Research Service 7-5700 USA. Available at: https://fas.org/sgp/crs/row/R41136.pdf.

  • • Murphy Alexander 1996 ‘The Sovereign State System as Political Territorial Ideal’ in Biersteker Thomas and Weber Cynthia (eds) State Sovereignty as Social Construct Cambridge University Press Cambridge UK 81-120.

  • • Pavković Alexander & Radan Peter 2007 Creating New states: Theory and Practice of Secession Ashgate Publishing Ltd. Farnham.

  • • Posen Barry 1993 ‘The security dilemma in ethnic conflict’ Survival XXV(1): 27-47.

  • • Putnam Linda & Wondolleck Julia M. 2003 ‘Intractability: Definition Dimensions and Distinctions’ in Lewicki Roy Gray Barbara and Elliott Michael (eds) ‘Making Sense of Intractable Environmental Conflicts: Concepts and Cases’ Island Press Washington DC 39-59.

  • • Richmond Oliver 1999 ‘Ethno-nationalism sovereignty and negotiating positions in the Cyprus conflict: obstacles to a settlement’ Middle Eastern Studies XXXV(3): 45-63.

  • • Roe Paul 1999 ‘The intrastate security dilemma: Ethnic conflict as a ‘tragedy?’ Journal of Peace Research XXXVI(2): 183-202.

  • • Roeder Philip 2009 ‘Ethnofederalism and the Mismanagement of Conflicting Nationalisms’ Regional and Federal Studies XIX(2): 203-219.

  • • Rose William 2000 ‘The security dilemma and ethnic conflict: Some new hypotheses’ Security Studies IX: 1-51.

  • • Rusinow Dennison I. 1981 The Cyprus Deadlock: Forever or another Day? American Universities Field Staff Hanover NH.

  • • Sack Robert 1986 Human Territoriality: Its Theory and History Cambridge University Press Cambridge.

  • • Saideman Stephen M. & Zahar Marie-Joelle (eds) 2008 Intra-State conflict governments and security: Dilemmas of deterrence and assurance Routledge London.

  • • Schlicher Ronald 2008 ‘How virgin must the birth of a new post-solution state of Cyprus be?’ Confidential Report by US Amb. to Cyprus WikiLeaks ID Classification: 08NICOSIA287. Available at: https://wikileaks.org/plusd/cables/08NICOSIA287_a.html.

  • • Shaw Malcolm 2003 International Law Cambridge University Press Cambridge.

  • • Snyder Jack & Jervis Robert 1999 ‘Civil war and the security dilemma’ in Walter Barbara & Snyder Jack (eds) Civil wars insecurity and intervention Columbia University Press New York 15-37.

  • • Steinberger Helmut 1967 ‘Constitutional subdivisions of states or unions and their capacity to conclude treaties Comments on Art. 5.2 Para. 2 of the ILC’s 1966 Draft Articles on the law of the treaties’ Zeitschrift für Ausländisches Offentliches Recht und Völkerrecht XXVII: 411-428.

  • • Storey David 2001 Territory: The Claiming of Space Pearson and Prentice Hall Harlow.

  • • Soysal Mümtaz 1999 ‘A solution for Cyprus through Statehood’ Journal of International Affairs IV(3): 1-7.

  • • Sözen Ahmet and Kudret Özersay. 2006 ‘The Annan Plan: State Succession or Continuity’ Middle Eastern Studies XLIII(1): 125-141.

  • • Tocci Natalie & Kovziridze Tamara 2004 ‘Europeanization and Conflict Resolution: Case Studies from the European Peripher’ JEMIE - Journal on Ethnopolitics and Minority Issues in Europe I: 1-35.

  • • Toft Monica 2001 ‘Indivisible Territory and Ethnic War’ Paper No. 1. Weatherhead Center for International Affairs Harvard University: 1-46.

  • • Visone Tommaso 2018 ‘Eurosceptic Federalism: Paradoxes and Relevance of a long-running Critique of European Integration’ Perspectives on Federalism X(1): 26-40.

  • • Wolff Stefan 2010 ‘Approaches to Conflict Resolution in Divided Societies: The Many Uses of Territorial Self-Governance’ Ethnopolitics Papers V: 1-38.

  • • Wouters Jan & De Smet Leen 2001 ‘The Legal Position of Federal States and their Federated Entities in International Relations - The Case of Belgium’ Institute for International Law K.U. Leuven Working Paper No 7: 1-32.

Search
Journal information
Impact Factor


CiteScore 2018: 0.04

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.105
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.03

Target audience: researchers, academics, practitioners interested in the field of political, economic and legal issues in federal states, regional organizations, and international organizations at global level
Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 8 8 7
PDF Downloads 8 8 6