A Federal Turn? The European Union’s Response to Constitutional Crises in the Member States

Open access

Abstract

The EU has not yet found effective answers to constitutional crises in its Member States, in particular Hungary and Poland. Due to systemic problems of compliance with the common values of Art. 2, the legitimacy of the EU constitutional order and its smooth functioning are under threat, but the EU lacks instruments of direct enforcement and coercion. Several authors have therefore proposed to ‘federalize’ EU mechanisms and to guarantee to EU institutions, in particular the Court of Justice, more powers to intervene vis-à-vis Member States. However, the current Treaty framework presents a series of obstacles to federal-like enforcement. Solutions to national crises must ultimately respect the constitutional balance between the Union and the Member States.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • · Alter Karen 2003 Establishing the Supremacy of European Law: The Making of an International Rule of Law in Europe Oxford University Press Oxford

  • · Avbelj Matej and Komárek Jan (eds) 2012 Constitutional Pluralism in the European Union and Beyond Hart Publishing Oxford.

  • · Batory Agnes 2016 ‘Defying the Commission: Creative Compliance and Respect for the Rule of Law in the EU’ Public Administration XCIV(3): 685-699.

  • · Blokker Paul 2014 New Democracies in Crisis? Routledge London.

  • · von Bogdandy Armin 2012 ‘Neither an International Organization Nor A Nation State: The EU as a Supranational Federation’ in Jones Erik Menon Anand and Weatherill Stephen (eds) The Oxford Handbook of the European Union Oxford University Press Oxford.

  • · von Bogdandy Armin and Bast Jürgen (eds) 2009 Principles of European Constitutional Law Hart Publishing Oxford.

  • · von Bogdandy Armin Kottmann Matthias Antpöhler Carlino Dickschen Johanna Hentrei Simon and Smrkolj Maja 2012 ‘Reverse Solange - Protecting the Essence of Fundamental Rights against EU Member States’ Common Market Law Review XLIX(2): 489-520.

  • · de Búrca Gráinne 2001 ‘The Road Not Taken: The EU as a Global Human Rights Actor’ American Journal of International Law CV(4): 649-693.

  • · Cappelletti Mauro 1989 The Judicial Process in Comparative Perspective Oxford University Press Oxford.

  • · Carothers Thomas 1998 ‘The Rule of Law Revival’ Foreign Affairs LXXVII(2): 95-106.

  • · Closa Carlos 2016 ‘Reinforcing EU monitoring of the rule of law: normative arguments institutional proposals and the procedural limitations’ in Closa Carlos and Kochenov Dimitry (eds) 2016 Reinforcing Rule of Law Oversight in the European Union Cambridge University Press Cambridge.

  • · Closa Carlos and Kochenov Dimitry (eds) 2016 Reinforcing Rule of Law Oversight in the European Union Cambridge University Press Cambridge.

  • · Closa Carlos Palestini Céspedes Stefano and Castillo Ortiz Pablo 2016 ‘Regional Organisations and Mechanisms for Democracy Protection in Latin America the Caribbean and the European Union’ EU-LAC Foundation.

  • · Cremona Marise 2011 ‘Values in EU Foreign Policy’ in Evans Maurice and Koutrakos Panos (eds) 2011 Beyond the Established Legal Orders. Policy Interconnections between the EU and the Rest of the World Oxford Hart Publishing.

  • · Dawson Mark and Muir Elise 2013 ‘Hungary and the Indirect Protection of EU Fundamental Rights and the Rule of Law’ German Law Journal XIV(10): 1959-1980.

  • · Delledonne Giacomo 2016 ‘Homogénéité Constitutionnelle et Protection des Droits Fondamentaux et de l’´Etat de Droit dans l’Ordre Juridique Européen’ Politique européenne no. 51: 86-109.

  • · Duxbury Alison B. 2011 The Participation of States in International Organisations - The Role of Human Rights and Democracy Cambridge University Press Cambridge.

  • · Eeckhout Piet 2002 ‘The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights and the Federal Question’ Common Market Law Review XXXIX(5): 945-994.

  • · Fontanelli Filippo ‘Hic Sunt Nationes: The Elusive Limits of the EU Charter and the German Constitutional Watchdog’ European Constitutional Law Review IX(2): 315-334.

  • · Franck Thomas 1992 ‘The Emerging Right to Democratic Governance’ American Journal of International Law LXXXVI(1): 46-91.

  • · Freyer Tony 1984 The Little Rock Crisis: a Constitutional Interpretation Greenwood Westport Connecticut.

  • · Gavison Ruth 2002 ‘What Belongs in a Constitution?’ Constitutional Political Economy XIII(1): 89-105.

  • · Goodin Robert E. 2007 ‘Enfranchising All Affected Interests and its Alternatives’ Philosophy and Public Affairs XXXV(1): 40-68.

  • · Hanschel Dirk 2017 ‘Enforcement of Federal Law against the German Lånder’ in Jakab Andras and Kochenov Dimitry (eds) 2017 The Enforcement of EU Law and Values - Ensuring Member States’ Compliance Oxford University Press Oxford.

  • · Jakab Andras 2016 ‘The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights as the most promising way of enforcing the rule of law against EU Member States’ in Closa Carlos and Kochenov Dimitry (eds) 2016 Reinforcing Rule of Law Oversight in the European Union Cambridge University Press Cambridge.

  • · Jakab Andras and Kochenov Dimitry (eds) 2017 The Enforcement of EU Law and Values - Ensuring Member States’ Compliance Oxford University Press Oxford.

  • · Kochenov Dimitry and Pech Laurent 2015 ‘Monitoring and Enforcement of the Rule of Law in the EU: Rhetoric and Reality’ European Constitutional Law Review XI(3): 512-540.

  • · Landau David 2013 ‘Abusive Constitutionalism’ UC Davis Law Review XLVII: 189-260

  • · Larik Joris 2016 Foreign Policy Objectives in European Constitutional Law Oxford University Press Oxford.

  • · Lazowski Adam 2013 ‘Decoding a Legal Enigma: the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and infringement proceedings’ ERA Forum XIV: 573-587.

  • · Lenaerts Koen 1996 ‘Federalism and Rights in the European Community’ in Ellis Katz and George Allan Tarr (eds) Federalism and Rights Rowman & Littlefield Publishers Lanham.

  • · Loewenstein Karl 1937 ‘Militant Democracy and Fundamental Rights I’ The American Political Science Review XXXI(3): 417-432.

  • · López-Basaguren Alberto 2017 ‘Regional Defiance and Enforcement of Federal Law in Spain’ in Jakab Andras and Kochenov Dimitry (eds) 2017 The Enforcement of EU Law and Values - Ensuring Member States’ Compliance Oxford University Press Oxford.

  • · Loughlin Martin 2010 Foundations of Public Law Oxford University Press Oxford.

  • · Mangiameli Stelio 2013 ‘Article 2: The Homogeneity Clause’ in Blanke Hermann-Josef and Mangiameli Stelio (eds) The Treaty on European Union (TEU) - A Commentary Springer Heidelberg.

  • · Müller Jan-Werner 2012 ‘Militant Democracy’ in Rosenfeld Michael and Sajó András (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law Oxford University Press Oxford.

  • · Muller Jan-Werner 2016 ‘Should the EU Protect Democracy and the Rule of Law inside Member States?’ European Law Journal XXI(2): 143-160.

  • · Nicolaidis Kalypso 2013 ‘European Demoicracy and its Crisis’ Journal of Common Market Studies LI(2): 351-369.

  • · Oliver Peter and Stefanelli Justin 2016 ‘Strengthening the Rule of Law in the EU: The Council’s Inaction’ Journal of Common Market Studies LIV(2): 1075-1084.

  • · Pech Laurent and Scheppele Kim Lane 2016 ‘The EU and Poland: Giving up on the Rule of Law’ Verfassungsblog on Constitutional Matters

  • · Sadurski Wojciech 2010 ‘Adding Bite to a Bark: the Story of Article 7 E.U. Enlargement and Jorg Haider’ Columbia Journal of European Law XVI(3): 385-426.

  • · Sajó András (ed) 2004 Militant Democracy Eleven International Utrecht.

  • · Sala Gemma 2013 ‘Federalism without Adjectives in Spain’ Publius XLIV(1): 109-134.

  • · Scharpf Fritz 2007 Reflections on Multilevel Legitimacy Max Planck Institute for the Study of Society Cologne.

  • · Scheppele Kim-Lane 2016 ‘Enforcing the basic principles of EU law through systemic infringement actions’ in Closa Carlos and Kochenov Dimitry (eds) Reinforcing Rule of Law Oversight in the European Union Cambridge University Press Cambridge.

  • · Schmitt Carl 2008 Constitutional Theory Duke University Press Durham.

  • · Schroeder Werner (ed) 2016 Strengthening the Rule of Law in Europe - Form a Common Conception to Mechanisms of Implementation Hart Publishing Oxford.

  • · Sullivan Kathleen and Feldman Noah 2013 Constitutional Law Foundation Press New York.

  • · Tushnet Mark 2017 ‘Enforcment of National Law against Subnational Units in the US’ in Jakab Andras and Kochenov Dimitry (eds) The Enforcement of EU Law and Values - Ensuring Member States’ Compliance Oxford University Press Oxford.

  • · CJEU Case C-41/71 Van Duyn ECLI:EU:C:1974:133.

  • · CJEU Case C-184/99 Grzelczyk ECLI:EU:C:2001:458.

  • · CJEU Case C-34/09 Zambrano ECLI:EU:C:2011:124.

  • · CJEU Case C-411/10 N. S. and others v Secretary of State for the Home Department and M. E. and Others ECLI:EU:C:2011:865.

  • · CJEU Case C-617/10 Akerberg Fransson ECLI:EU:C:2013:105.

  • · CJEU Opinion 2/13 EU Accession to the ECHR ECLI:EU:C:2014:2454.

  • · CJEU Joined Cases C-404/15 and C-659/15 PPU Pál Aranyosi and Robert Căldăraru v Generalstaatsanwaltschaft Bremen ECLI:EU:C:2016:198.

  • · CJEU Case C-638/16 PPU X and X ECLI:EU:C:2017:173.

  • · ECtHR M.S.S. v Belgium and Greece Application No 30696/09 Judgment of 21 January 2011.

  • · ECtHR Tarakhel v Switzerland Application no. 29217/12 Judgment of 4 November 2014.

  • · US Supreme Court Luther v Borden 48 U.S. 1(1849).

  • · US Supreme Court Brown v Board of Educators 347 U.S. 483 (1954).

  • · US Supreme Court Baker v Carr 369 U.S. 186 (1962).

Search
Journal information
Impact Factor


CiteScore 2018: 0.04

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.105
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.03

Target audience: researchers, academics, practitioners interested in the field of political, economic and legal issues in federal states, regional organizations, and international organizations at global level
Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 361 221 5
PDF Downloads 274 197 4