A Federal Turn? The European Union’s Response to Constitutional Crises in the Member States

Open access

Abstract

The EU has not yet found effective answers to constitutional crises in its Member States, in particular Hungary and Poland. Due to systemic problems of compliance with the common values of Art. 2, the legitimacy of the EU constitutional order and its smooth functioning are under threat, but the EU lacks instruments of direct enforcement and coercion. Several authors have therefore proposed to ‘federalize’ EU mechanisms and to guarantee to EU institutions, in particular the Court of Justice, more powers to intervene vis-à-vis Member States. However, the current Treaty framework presents a series of obstacles to federal-like enforcement. Solutions to national crises must ultimately respect the constitutional balance between the Union and the Member States.

· Alter Karen, 2003, Establishing the Supremacy of European Law: The Making of an International Rule of Law in Europe, Oxford University Press, Oxford

· Avbelj Matej and Komárek Jan (eds), 2012, Constitutional Pluralism in the European Union and Beyond, Hart Publishing, Oxford.

· Batory Agnes, 2016, ‘Defying the Commission: Creative Compliance and Respect for the Rule of Law in the EU’, Public Administration, XCIV(3): 685-699.

· Blokker Paul, 2014, New Democracies in Crisis?, Routledge, London.

· von Bogdandy Armin, 2012, ‘Neither an International Organization Nor A Nation State: The EU as a Supranational Federation’, in Jones Erik, Menon Anand and Weatherill Stephen (eds), The Oxford Handbook of the European Union, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

· von Bogdandy Armin and Bast Jürgen (eds), 2009, Principles of European Constitutional Law, Hart Publishing, Oxford.

· von Bogdandy Armin, Kottmann Matthias, Antpöhler Carlino, Dickschen Johanna, Hentrei Simon and Smrkolj Maja 2012, ‘Reverse Solange - Protecting the Essence of Fundamental Rights against EU Member States’, Common Market Law Review, XLIX(2): 489-520.

· de Búrca Gráinne, 2001, ‘The Road Not Taken: The EU as a Global Human Rights Actor’, American Journal of International Law, CV(4): 649-693.

· Cappelletti Mauro, 1989, The Judicial Process in Comparative Perspective, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

· Carothers Thomas, 1998, ‘The Rule of Law Revival’, Foreign Affairs, LXXVII(2): 95-106.

· Closa Carlos, 2016, ‘Reinforcing EU monitoring of the rule of law: normative arguments, institutional proposals and the procedural limitations’, in Closa Carlos and Kochenov Dimitry (eds), 2016, Reinforcing Rule of Law Oversight in the European Union, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

· Closa Carlos and Kochenov Dimitry (eds), 2016, Reinforcing Rule of Law Oversight in the European Union, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

· Closa Carlos, Palestini Céspedes Stefano and Castillo Ortiz Pablo, 2016, ‘Regional Organisations and Mechanisms for Democracy Protection in Latin America, the Caribbean, and the European Union’, EU-LAC Foundation.

· Cremona Marise, 2011, ‘Values in EU Foreign Policy’, in Evans Maurice and Koutrakos Panos (eds), 2011, Beyond the Established Legal Orders. Policy Interconnections between the EU and the Rest of the World, Oxford, Hart Publishing.

· Dawson Mark and Muir Elise, 2013, ‘Hungary and the Indirect Protection of EU Fundamental Rights and the Rule of Law’, German Law Journal, XIV(10): 1959-1980.

· Delledonne Giacomo, 2016, ‘Homogénéité Constitutionnelle et Protection des Droits Fondamentaux et de l’´Etat de Droit dans l’Ordre Juridique Européen’, Politique européenne, no. 51: 86-109.

· Duxbury Alison B., 2011, The Participation of States in International Organisations - The Role of Human Rights and Democracy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

· Eeckhout Piet, 2002, ‘The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights and the Federal Question’, Common Market Law Review, XXXIX(5): 945-994.

· Fontanelli Filippo, ‘Hic Sunt Nationes: The Elusive Limits of the EU Charter and the German Constitutional Watchdog’, European Constitutional Law Review, IX(2): 315-334.

· Franck Thomas, 1992, ‘The Emerging Right to Democratic Governance’, American Journal of International Law, LXXXVI(1): 46-91.

· Freyer Tony, 1984, The Little Rock Crisis: a Constitutional Interpretation, Greenwood, Westport, Connecticut.

· Gavison Ruth, 2002, ‘What Belongs in a Constitution?’, Constitutional Political Economy, XIII(1): 89-105.

· Goodin Robert E., 2007, ‘Enfranchising All Affected Interests and its Alternatives’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, XXXV(1): 40-68.

· Hanschel Dirk, 2017, ‘Enforcement of Federal Law against the German Lånder’, in Jakab Andras and Kochenov Dimitry (eds), 2017, The Enforcement of EU Law and Values - Ensuring Member States’ Compliance, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

· Jakab Andras, 2016, ‘The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights as the most promising way of enforcing the rule of law against EU Member States’, in Closa Carlos and Kochenov Dimitry (eds), 2016, Reinforcing Rule of Law Oversight in the European Union, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

· Jakab Andras and Kochenov Dimitry (eds), 2017, The Enforcement of EU Law and Values - Ensuring Member States’ Compliance, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

· Kochenov Dimitry and Pech Laurent, 2015, ‘Monitoring and Enforcement of the Rule of Law in the EU: Rhetoric and Reality’, European Constitutional Law Review, XI(3): 512-540.

· Landau David, 2013, ‘Abusive Constitutionalism’, UC Davis Law Review, XLVII: 189-260

· Larik Joris, 2016 Foreign Policy Objectives in European Constitutional Law, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

· Lazowski Adam, 2013, ‘Decoding a Legal Enigma: the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and infringement proceedings’, ERA Forum, XIV: 573-587.

· Lenaerts Koen, 1996, ‘Federalism and Rights in the European Community’, in Ellis Katz and George Allan Tarr (eds), Federalism and Rights, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Lanham.

· Loewenstein Karl, 1937, ‘Militant Democracy and Fundamental Rights I’, The American Political Science Review, XXXI(3): 417-432.

· López-Basaguren, Alberto, 2017, ‘Regional Defiance and Enforcement of Federal Law in Spain’, in Jakab Andras and Kochenov Dimitry (eds), 2017, The Enforcement of EU Law and Values - Ensuring Member States’ Compliance, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

· Loughlin Martin, 2010, Foundations of Public Law, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

· Mangiameli Stelio, 2013, ‘Article 2: The Homogeneity Clause’, in Blanke Hermann-Josef and Mangiameli Stelio (eds), The Treaty on European Union (TEU) - A Commentary, Springer, Heidelberg.

· Müller Jan-Werner, 2012, ‘Militant Democracy’, in Rosenfeld Michael and Sajó András (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

· Muller Jan-Werner, 2016, ‘Should the EU Protect Democracy and the Rule of Law inside Member States?’, European Law Journal, XXI(2): 143-160.

· Nicolaidis Kalypso, 2013, ‘European Demoicracy and its Crisis’, Journal of Common Market Studies, LI(2): 351-369.

· Oliver Peter and Stefanelli Justin, 2016, ‘Strengthening the Rule of Law in the EU: The Council’s Inaction’, Journal of Common Market Studies, LIV(2): 1075-1084.

· Pech Laurent and Scheppele Kim Lane, 2016, ‘The EU and Poland: Giving up on the Rule of Law’, Verfassungsblog on Constitutional Matters,

· Sadurski Wojciech, 2010, ‘Adding Bite to a Bark: the Story of Article 7, E.U. Enlargement, and Jorg Haider’, Columbia Journal of European Law, XVI(3): 385-426.

· Sajó András (ed), 2004, Militant Democracy, Eleven International, Utrecht.

· Sala Gemma, 2013, ‘Federalism without Adjectives in Spain’, Publius, XLIV(1): 109-134.

· Scharpf Fritz, 2007, Reflections on Multilevel Legitimacy, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Society, Cologne.

· Scheppele Kim-Lane, 2016, ‘Enforcing the basic principles of EU law through systemic infringement actions’, in Closa Carlos and Kochenov Dimitry (eds), Reinforcing Rule of Law Oversight in the European Union, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

· Schmitt Carl, 2008, Constitutional Theory, Duke University Press, Durham.

· Schroeder Werner (ed), 2016, Strengthening the Rule of Law in Europe - Form a Common Conception to Mechanisms of Implementation, Hart Publishing, Oxford.

· Sullivan Kathleen and Feldman Noah, 2013, Constitutional Law, Foundation Press, New York.

· Tushnet Mark, 2017, ‘Enforcment of National Law against Subnational Units in the US’, in Jakab Andras and Kochenov Dimitry (eds), The Enforcement of EU Law and Values - Ensuring Member States’ Compliance, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

· CJEU, Case C-41/71 Van Duyn, ECLI:EU:C:1974:133.

· CJEU, Case C-184/99 Grzelczyk, ECLI:EU:C:2001:458.

· CJEU, Case C-34/09 Zambrano, ECLI:EU:C:2011:124.

· CJEU, Case C-411/10, N. S. and others v Secretary of State for the Home Department and M. E. and Others, ECLI:EU:C:2011:865.

· CJEU, Case C-617/10 Akerberg Fransson, ECLI:EU:C:2013:105.

· CJEU, Opinion 2/13, EU Accession to the ECHR, ECLI:EU:C:2014:2454.

· CJEU, Joined Cases C-404/15 and C-659/15 PPU, Pál Aranyosi and Robert Căldăraru v Generalstaatsanwaltschaft Bremen, ECLI:EU:C:2016:198.

· CJEU, Case C-638/16 PPU, X and X, ECLI:EU:C:2017:173.

· ECtHR, M.S.S. v Belgium and Greece, Application No 30696/09, Judgment of 21 January 2011.

· ECtHR, Tarakhel v Switzerland, Application no. 29217/12, Judgment of 4 November 2014.

· US Supreme Court, Luther v Borden 48 U.S. 1(1849).

· US Supreme Court, Brown v Board of Educators, 347 U.S. 483 (1954).

· US Supreme Court, Baker v Carr 369 U.S. 186 (1962).

Journal Information

CiteScore 2017: 0.20

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.107
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.395

Target Group researchers, academics, practitioners interested in the field of political, economic and legal issues in federal states, regional organizations, and international organizations at global level

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 180 180 18
PDF Downloads 127 127 21