Reconstructing Social Dialogue

Open access


The European Social Dialogue, and its output, the European collective agreements, are intended to implement minimum standards of working conditions that bind all Member- States, in a logic of legal harmonisation of the European Union’s social objectives. However, despite some federal traits of the European Union (“EU”), since the beginning European social dialogue has faced numerous challenges, particularly when confronted with the need to balance economic interests, giving social policies a subsidiary role, and when facing the different agendas of each Member-State. This article proceeds with a historical analysis of the development of European Social Dialogue, its implementation stages, and past and current challenges, which can be divided in three phases: past experience, present experience and current challenges and, finally, an attempt to project what new social policies might hold for the future.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • · Adnett Nick 2001 ‘Modernizing the European Social Model: Developing the Guidelines’ Journal of Common Market Studies XXXIX(2): 353-364.

  • · Aguilar Gonzálvez Maria Cristina 2006 “La negociación colectiva en el sistema normativo” Lex Nova Valladolid.

  • · Aguilar Gonzálvez Maria Cristina 2011 ‘El diálogo social ¿una herramienta para el futuro?’ Revista del Ministerio de Trabajo e Inmigración Derecho social Internacional y Comunitario 107-139.

  • · Aubin Claire 2007 ‘L`Europe sociale entre mythe et réalité’ Droit Social no. 5: 618-622.

  • · Bercusson Brian 1996 European Labour Law Butterworths London.

  • · Biagi Marco 1999 ‘The role of social partners in Europe: from dialogue to partnership’ Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal XX(3): 485-796.

  • · Blanpain Roger 2010 European Labour Law 12th edition Kluwer Law International Alphen aan de Rijn.

  • · Blas López Maria Esther 2006 ‘Le cadre d`action des partenaires sociaux européens: panorama mutations et enjeux à l`heure de la mondialisation’ Droit Social no. 5: 540-561.

  • · Borrel Josep 2014 ‘Is a Federal Europe Possible?’ The Federalist Debate XXVII(3) available at:

  • · Branch Anne 2005 ‘The evolution of the European Social Dialogue towards greater autonomy - challenges and potential benefits’ International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations.

  • · Brouillet Jacques et al. 2006 ‘Le modèle social européen: source ou moteur de la construction européenne?’ Droit Social no. 12: 1176-1182.

  • · Cavallazzi Ron Galea Vella Marisa and Mizzi Edward 2017 The European Pillar of Social Rights and its implications on employment available at

  • · Chassard Yves 2007 ‘Un modèle social européen par défaut’ in Dehove M. (ed) Le nouvel état de l`Europe La Découverte Paris

  • · Correia António 2010 ‘O diálogo social europeu’ Revista Tribunal Reg. Trabalho 3ª Reg. Belo Horizonte LI no. 81: 185-194.

  • · Decker Franck 2002 ‘Governance beyond the nation-state. Reflections on the democratic deficit of the European Union’ Journal of European Public Policy IX(2): 256-272.

  • · Ehlermann C.D. 1997 ‘Différenciation flexibilité coopération renforcée: les nouvelles dispositions du traité d'Amsterdam’ Revue du Marché Unique Européen no. 3: 51-90.

  • · Erhel Christine and Palier Bruno 2005 ‘L`Europe sociale: entre modèles nationaux et coordination européenne’ Revue d´économie politique no. 6: 677-704.

  • · Franssen E. 2002 Legal aspects of the European Social Dialogue Intersentia Antwerp - Oxford - New York.

  • · Keiser Wolfram and Varsori Antonio 2010 European Union History: Themes and Debates Palgrave Macmillan Basingstoke.

  • · King Preston 1982 Federalism and Federation Johns Hopkins University Press Baltimore.

  • · Lo Faro Antonio 2012 ‘Bargaining in the shadow of optional framework? The rise of transnational collective agreements and EU law’ European Journal of Industrial Relations XVIII: 153-165.

  • · Lynch-Fannon Irene 2006 ‘The European Social Model of Corporate Governance: Prospects for Success in an Enlarged Europe’ in Ali P. and Gregoriou G.N. (eds) International Corporate Governance After Sarbanes-Oxley Wiley Hoboken NJ 423-443.

  • · Lyon-Caen Antoine 1997a ‘Le rôle des partenaires sociaux dans la mise en oeuvre du droit communautaire’ Droit Social no. 1: 66-74.

  • · Lyon-Caen Antoine 1997b ‘La négociation collective dans ses dimensions internationales’ Droit Social no. 4: 352-367.

  • · Miranda Boto José María 2011 ‘Las competencias de la Unión Europea en materia social: panorama y perspectivas de futuro’ Revista del Ministerio de Trabajo e Inmigración Derecho social Internacional y Comunitario 75-105.

  • · Monereo Perez Jose Luis 1999 Concertación y diálogo social Lex Nova Valladolid.

  • · Petit Benoît 2010 ‘Un regard juridique sur la dynamique du modèle social européen’ Droit Social no. 2: 213-222.

  • · Ramalho Maria do Rosário 2012 ‘O Tratado de Lisboa e o Modelo Social da União Europeia. Algumas Notas’ in O Tratado de Lisboa Almedina Coimbra 57-70.

  • · Regent Sabrina 2003 ‘The Open Method of Coordination: A New Supranational Form of Governance’ European Law Journal IX(2): 190-214.

  • · Roberts Ivor and Springer Beverly R. 2001 Social policy in the European Union: between harmonization and national autonomy Lynne Riener Boulder.

  • · Rogowski Ralf 2008 ‘The European Social Model and Transitional Labour Markets’ in Law and Police Studies in Modern Law and Police Ashgate 9-27.

  • · Schäfer Armin and Leiber Simone 2009 ‘The double voluntarism in EU social dialogue and employment Policy’ in Kröger Sandra (ed) What we have learnt: Advances pitfalls and remaining questions in OMC research European Integration online Papers (EIoP) Special Issue 1 Vol. 13 Art. 9 available at:

  • · Scharpf Fritz W. 2002 ‘The European Social Model: Coping with the Challenges of Diversity’ Journal of Common Market Studies XL(4): 645-670.

  • · Sciarra Silvana 1993 ‘European Social Policy and Labour Law - Challenges and Perspectives’ CCAEL IV(1): 301-340.

  • · Sisson Keith 1999 ‘The “new” European Social Model: the end of the search for an orthodoxy or another false dawn?’ Employee Relations XXI(5): 445-462.

  • · Smismans Stijn 2008 ‘The European Social Dialogue in the Shadow of Hierarchy’ Journal of Public Policy XXVIII(1): 161-180.

  • · Smismans Stijn 2007 ‘The European Social Dialogue between constitutional and labour law’ European Law Review XXXII: 341-364.

  • · Soares António Goucha 1999 ‘DE ROMA A AMESTERDÃO: O caminho da integração europeia’ SOCIUS - Centro de Investigação em Sociologia Económica e das Organizações no. 1/99: 1-35.

  • · Veneziani Bruno 1998 ‘Dal dialogo sociale alla conttratazione collettiva nella fase della trasformazione istituzionale dell’Unione Europea’ Rivista Giuridica del Lavoro e della Previdenza Sociale XLIX(2): 239-286.

  • · Vitorino António 2012 ‘As Inovações do Tratado de Lisboa’ in O Tratado de Lisboa - Jornadas organizadas pelo Instituto de Ciências Jurídico-Políticas da Faculdade de Direito da Universidade de Lisboa Almedina Coimbra.

  • · Vogel-Polsky Éliane 1989 ‘L`Acte unique ouvre-t-il l`espace social européen?’ Droit Social no. 2: 177-189.

  • · Weiss Manfred 1990 ‘Perspectives of the European Labour Law and Industrial Relations’ in Biagi Marco (ed) Towards a European Model of Industrial Relations? Kluwer Law International Alphen aan de Rijn 97-108.

  • · Welz Christian 2008 The European Social Dialogue Under Articles 138 and 139 of the EC Treaty - Actors Processes Outcomes Wolters Kluwer Law & Business Kluwer Law International Alphen aan de Rijn.

  • · Wessels Wolfgang et al. ‘A Europa de A a Z - Guia da integração Europeia’ in Institut für Europäische Politik European Commission n.d. available at:

  • · Wickham James 2002 ‘The End of The European Social Model: Before It Began?’ in National Forum on Europe Appendix II.

  • · COM (2017) 2025 of 1 March 2017 White Paper on the future of Europe Reflections and scenarios for the EU27 by 2025.

  • · Guardiancich Igor; Molina Oscar Talking through the crisis: social dialogue and industrial relations trends in selected EU countries / edited by Igor Guardiancich and Oscar Molina; International Labour Office Governance and Tripartism Department. - Geneva: ILO 2017.

  • · European Commission Brussels 26.4.2017 SWD(2017) 201 final - Establishing a European Pillar of Social Rights {COM (2017) 250 final}

  • · European Commission Brussels 26.4.2017 COM (2017) 250 final Communication from the Commission - Establishing a European Pillar of Social Rights {SWD(2017) 200 final}

  • · A new start for Social Dialogue European Commission Directorate-General for Employment Social Affairs and Inclusion August 2016

  • · European Commission Employment and Social Developments in Europe Annual Review 2016 December 2016

  • · Reflection Paper on the Social Dimension of Europe European Commission COM (2017) 206 of 26 April 2017

  • · Role of Social Dialogue in European Economic and Social Governance n°104 - Industrial Relations in Europe June 2016

  • · Eurofound Role of the social partners in the European Semester Christian Weltz February 2016 available in

  • · COM/2007/0359 final of 26 of June 2007 - Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament the Council the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions - Towards Common Principles of Flexicurity: More and better jobs through flexibility and security

Journal information
Impact Factor

CiteScore 2018: 0.04

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.105
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.03

Target audience: researchers, academics, practitioners interested in the field of political, economic and legal issues in federal states, regional organizations, and international organizations at global level
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 289 139 2
PDF Downloads 156 101 5