Differentiated integration contingent on objective ability: a federalist critique

Open access

Abstract

This article is inspired by the 2017 discussions on the future of Europe (in particular some of the ideas debated in the White Paper on the Future of Europe, published by the European Commission) and the events that took place in the crises and post-crises period (aftermath of the financial crisis, ongoing refugee crisis and the Brexit shock). It is particularly interested in the scenario of differentiated integration. In this regard, it observes how in the aftermath of the crises, there was a shift in the rationale of differentiated integration with objective (in)ability of the states taking a prominent role. It presents a federalist critique of this development, drawing on the work of Daniel Elazar, discussing the concepts of non-centralization, federal process and federal covenant in the context of the 2017 discussions in the EU.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • · Agamben Giorgio 2005 State of Exception University of Chicago Press Chicago.

  • · Albi Anneli 2018 (forthcoming) ‘Comparative Report’ in Albi Anneli and Bardutzky Samo (eds) National Constitutions in European and Global Governance: Democracy Rights and the Rule of Law TMC Asser Press the Hague.

  • · Athanassiou Phoebus 2009 ‘Withdrawal and Expulsion from the EU and EMU: Some Reflections’ ECB Legal Working Paper No. 10 available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1517760

  • · Avbelj Matej 2017 ‘What Future for the European Union?’ WZB Discussion Paper SP IV 2017-802 available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3009672.

  • · Börzel Tanja 2003 'What Can Federalism Teach Us About the European Union? The German Experience’ Paper prepared for the Conference “Governing together in the New Europe” Robinson College Cambridge 12-13 April 2003 available at: https://www.chathamhouse.org/sites/files/chathamhouse/public/Research/Europe/borzel.pdf.

  • · Burgess Michael 2009 ‘Federalism’ in Wiener Antje and Diez Thomas (eds) European Integration Theory (Second Edition) Oxford University Press Oxford 25-44.

  • · Burgess Michael 2012 In Search of the Federal Spirit: New Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives in Comparative Federalism Oxford University Press Oxford.

  • · Christodoulidis Emilios 2017 ‘Subjects and Technologies of European Governance: Reflections on suspect crossings’ in Bardutzky Samo and Fahey Elaine (eds) Framing the Subjects and Objects of Contemporary EU Law Edward Elgar Cheltenham 64 -71.

  • · Cuyver Armin 2017 ‘Five Scenarios for Europe - Understanding the EU Commission’s White Paper on the Future of Europe’ Verfassungsblog available at: http://verfassungsblog.de/five-scenarios-for-europeunderstanding-the-eu-commissions-white-paper-on-the-future-of-europe/.

  • · Cvjetović Srdjan 2017 ‘Velika noč veliki preizkus za novo uredbo o nadzoru schengenske meje' Siol.net available at: http://siol.net/trendi/potovanja/velika-noc-veliki-preizkus-za-novo-direktivo-onadzoru-schengenske-meje-439410.

  • · Elazar Daniel 1987 Exploring Federalism University of Alabama Press Tuscaloosa.

  • · Elazar Daniel 1991 ‘The European Community: Between State Sovereignty and Subsidiarity’ available at: http://www.jcpa.org/dje/articles2/eurcomm.htm.

  • · Greider Alice 2017 ‘Outsourcing Migration Management: The Role of the Western Balkans in the European Refugee Crisis’ available at: http://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/outsourcing-migrationmanagement-western-balkans-europes-refugee-crisis.

  • · Halberstam Daniel 2004 ‘Of Power and Responsibility: The Political Morality of Federal Systems’ Virginia Law Review XC (3):731-834 available at: http://www.virginialawreview.org/volumes/content/power-and-responsibility-political-morality-federalsystems.

  • · Halberstam Daniel 2008 ‘Comparative Federalism and the Role of the Judiciary’ in Whittington Keith E. Kelemen R. Daniel and Caldeira Gregory A. (eds) Oxford Handbook of Law and Politics Oxford University Press Oxford 142-164

  • · Halberstam Daniel 2011 ‘Federalism: A Critical Guide’ University of Michigan Public Law and Legal Theory Working Paper Series No. 251 available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1924939.

  • · Kukovec Damjan 2014 ‘Law and the Periphery’ European Law Journal XXI (3): 406-428.

  • · Menéndez Agustín José 2012 ‘A proportionate constitution? Economic freedoms substantive constitutional choices and dérapages in European Union law’ in Chiti Edoardo Menéndez Agustín José and Teixeira Pedro Gustavo (eds) The European Rescue of the European Union?: The existential crisis of the European political project ARENA Report No 3/12 RECON Report No 19 available at: https://pure.au.dk/ws/files/69770796/RECONreport1912.pdf.

  • · Moots Glenn C. 2013 ‘The Covenant Tradition of Federalism: The Pioneering Studies of Daniel J. Elazar’ in Ward Ann (ed) The Ashgate Research Companion to Federalism Routledge Abingdon 391-412.

  • · Oeter Stefan 2006 ‘Federalism and Democracy’ in von Bogdandy Armin and Bast Jürgen (eds) Principles of European Constitutional Law Hart Publishing Oxford 53-93.

  • · Palmeri Tara 2016 'Ministers of ‘core’ Europe plan EU’s future: Foreign ministers from founding EU nations to hold talks in Rome' Politico.eu available at: http://www.politico.eu/article/ministers-core-europeplan-eu-future-rome-meeting-founding-members-integration/.

  • · Posaner Joshua 2017 ‘Commission extends Schengen border checks for a final time’ Politico.eu available at: http://www.politico.eu/article/commission-extends-schengen-border-checks-for-a-final-time/.

  • · Schimmelpfenig Frank and Winzen Thomas 2015 ‘Patterns of differentiated integration in the European Union’ available at: https://www.ethz.ch/content/dam/ethz/special-interest/gess/cis/europeanpoliticsdam/documents/People/Publications/Schimmelfennig_Winzen_differentiated_integration_revised.pdf.

  • · Schwarz Michael 2016 Grundlinien der Anerkennung im Raum der Freiheit Sicherheit und Justiz Mohr Siebeck Tübingen.

  • · Somek Alexander 2017 ‘Ex Oriente Lux?’ Verfassungsblog available at: http://verfassungsblog.de/exoriente-lux/.

  • · Stone Jon 2016 ‘Minister for Brexit David Davis appeared unaware of how EU trade deals actually work’ Independent available at: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/minister-for-brexit-davisdavis-eu-european-union-germany-single-market-trade-deals-unaware-mistake-a7136121.html.

  • · Stubb Alexander 1996 ‘A Categorization of Differentiated Integration’ Journal of Common Market Studies XXXIV(2): 283-295.

  • · Tekin Funda 2017 ‘Differentiated Integration’ IEP Online Paper Institut für Europäische Politik available at: http://iep-berlin.de/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/Funda-Tekin-Differentiated-Integration-Online-Paper2017.pdf.

  • · Thym Daniel 2017 ‘Competing models for understanding differentiated integration’ in De Witte Bruno Ott Andrea and Vos Ellen Vos (eds) Between Flexibility and Disintegration: The Trajectory of Differentiation in EU Law Edward Elgar Cheltenham 28-75.

Search
Journal information
Impact Factor


CiteScore 2018: 0.04

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.105
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.03

Target audience: researchers, academics, practitioners interested in the field of political, economic and legal issues in federal states, regional organizations, and international organizations at global level
Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 237 121 6
PDF Downloads 156 91 2