Metaphorical Descriptions of Well-Doers

Open access

Abstract

What is a metaphoric picture of a “well-doer” made of? In a study devoted to the development of the ability to use metaphorical descriptions of humans, I tried to establish the semantic fields of four target metaphors: Human-Apple Tree, Human-Sun, Human-Cup, Human-Dolphin. Over 300 young adults (the exact number depending on the stimuli), both men and women aged 19-26, were asked to decipher the metaphors’ meanings. The results were obtained mainly by qualitative analysis, with frequency counts of clusters containing synonymous meanings. The results indicate that, while creating imaginary characteristics of ‘“kind humans,” young adults focus on three factors: benefactor provides help (which takes various, but consistent forms: he/she gives hope, an ear to listen to one’s problems, shares fruits of work, provides warmth and joy, etc.), benefactor’s mental stability (as opposed to sudden changes of mood, which is associated with weakness), benefactor’s skill of merging cheerfulness and tranquility. The semantic fields of stimuli addressed to kindness are more complex than the ones connected with evil. Goodness may be associated with wisdom, maturity, generosity, with both inactivity and vividness. Beauty seems to be less important than was expected. The results may serve for developmental comparisons.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Baldwin C. P. & Baldwin A. L. (1970). Children’s judgments of kindness. Child Development41(1) 29–47. doi:10.2307/1127387

  • Bartczak M. & Bokus B. (2013). Rozumienie pojęć w depresji. [Understanding metaphors in depression]. Piaseczno: LEXEM.

  • Białecka-Pikul M. (2003). Metaphors in preschool child thinking about the mind. Psychology of Language and Communication7(2) 37–47.

  • Black M. (1979). More about metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.) Metaphor and thought (pp. 19–43). Cambridge MA: Cambridge University Press.

  • Bloom P. (2013). Just babies: The origins of good and evil. New York NY: Crown.

  • Boroditsky L. (2000). Metaphoric structuring: Understanding time through spatial metaphors. Cognition75(1) 1–28. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00073-6

  • Brambilla M. & Leach C. W. (2014). On the importance of being moral: The distinctive role of morality in social judgment. Social Cognition32(4) 397–408. doi:10.1521/soco.2014.32.4.397

  • Brambilla M. Rusconi P. Sacchi S. & Cherubini P. (2011). Looking for honesty: The primary role of morality (vs. sociability and competence) in information gathering. European Journal of Social Psychology41(2) 135–143. doi:10.1002/ejsp.744

  • Chandler M. J. Greenspan S. & Barenboim C. (1973). Judgments of intentionality in response to videotaped and verbally presented moral dilemmas: The medium is the message. Child Development44(2) 315–320. doi:10.2307/1128053

  • Chiappe D. L. Kennedy J. M. & Chiappe P. (2003). Aptness is more important than comprehensibility in preference for metaphors and similes. Poetics31 51–68. doi:10.1016/S0304-422X(03)00003-2

  • Chiappe D. L. Kennedy J. M. & Smykowski T. (2003). Reversibility aptness and the conventionality of metaphors and similes. Metaphor and Symbol18(2) 85–105. doi:10.1207/S15327868MS1802_2

  • Colby A. Kohlberg L. Gibbs J. Lieberman M. Fischer K. & Saltzstein H. D. (1983). A longitudinal study of moral judgment. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development48(1–2) 1–124. doi:10.2307/1165935

  • Cuddy A. J. Fiske S. T. & Glick P. (2008). Warmth and competence as universal dimensions of social perception: The stereotype content model and the BIAS map. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology40 61–149. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(07)00002-0

  • Cushman F. (2008). Crime and punishment: Distinguishing the roles of causal and intentional analyses in moral judgment. Cognition108 353–380. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2008.03.006

  • Cushman F. Young L. & Hauser M. (2006). The role of conscious reasoning and intuition in moral judgment: Testing three principles of harm. Psychological Science17 1082–1089. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01834.x

  • Dryll E. M. (2009). Changes in metaphor comprehension in children. Polish Psychological Bulletin40(4/2009) 49–57. doi:10.2478/s10059-009-0015-1

  • Dryll E. M. (2017). Metaphorical descriptions of wrongdoers. Psychology of Language and Communication21(1) 171–191. doi:10.1515/plc-2017-0009

  • Dryll E. M. & Bokus B. (2016). Zrozumieć metaforę: Studium z psycholingwistki rozwojowej [Understanding metaphors: A study in developmental psycholinguistics]. Piaseczno: LEXEM.

  • Dryll E. M. & Bokus B. (2018). Разбиране от деца и юноши на метафори описващи хора [Children’s and adolescents’ comprehension of metaphors describing people]. Ezik i Literatura [Language and Literature]. No. 1–2 9–26. Print ISSN: 0324-1270 Online ISSN: 2535-1036 Retrieved from http://www.ezik-i-literatura.eu/2018/1-2/2-Dril-Bokus

  • Fiske S. T. Cuddy A. J. & Glick P. (2007). Universal dimensions of social cognition: Warmth and competence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences11(2) 77–83. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.005

  • Gantman A. P. & Van Bavel J. J. (2015). Moral perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences19(11) 631–633. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2015.08.004

  • Gentner D. (1983). Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science7 155–170. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog0702_3

  • Gentner D. & Clement C. A. (1988). Evidence for relational selectivity in the interpretation of analogy and metaphor. In G. H. Bower (Ed.) The psychology of learning and motivation (pp. 307–358). New York NY: Academic Press.

  • Gibbs R. W. Jr (2001). Evaluating contemporary models of figurative language understanding. Metaphor and Symbol16(3–4) 317–333. doi:10.1080/10926488.2001.9678900

  • Gibbs R. W. Jr (2002). The poetics of mind. Figurative thought language and understanding. Cambridge MA: Cambridge University Press.

  • Glucksberg S. (2003). The psycholinguistics of metaphor. Trends in Cognitive Sciences7(2) 92–96. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(02)00040-2

  • Glucksberg S. (2008). How metaphors create categories–quickly. In R. W. Gibbs Jr (Ed.) The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 67–83). Cambridge MA: Cambridge University Press.

  • Glucksberg S. & Haught C. (2006). On the relation between metaphor and simile: When comparison fails. Mind and Language21(3) 360–378. doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.2006.00282.x

  • Glucksberg S. & Keysar B. (1990). Understanding metaphorical comparisons: Beyond similarity. Psychological Review97 3–18. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.97.1.3

  • Gottwald J. M. Elsner B. & Pollatos O. (2015). Good is up: Spatial metaphors in action observation. Frontiers in Psychology6 1605. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01605

  • Góralski A. (1987). Metody opisu i wnioskowania statystycznego dla psychologów i pedagogów [Methods of description and statistical reasoning for psychologists and pedagogues]. Warsaw: PWN.

  • Graham J. Nosek B. A. Haidt J. Iyer R. Koleva S. & Ditto P. H. (2011). Mapping the moral domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology101 366–385. doi:10.1037/a0021847

  • Graves M. P. (1983). Functions of key metaphors in early Quaker sermons 1671–1700. Quarterly Journal of Speech69(4) 364–378. doi:10.1080/00335638309383663

  • Gray K. Young L. & Waytz A. (2012). Mind perception is the essence of morality. Psychological Inquiry23(2) 101–124. doi:10.1080/1047840X.2012.651387

  • Hamlin J. K. Wynn K. & Bloom P. (2007). Social evaluation by preverbal infants. Nature450(7169) 557.

  • Karylowski J. (1982). Doing good to feel good v. doing good to make others feel good: Some child-rearing antecedents. School Psychology International 3(3) 149–156. doi:10.1177/0143034382033004

  • Kennedy J. M. & Chiappe D. L. (1999). What makes a metaphor stronger than a simile? Metaphor and Symbol14 63–69. doi:10.1207/s15327868ms1401_7

  • Kubicka D. (2005). Myślenie metaforyczne i jego uwarunkowania u dzieci w wieku od 4 do 10 lat [Make strange familiar and make familiar strange: Metaphoric thinking in children from 4 to 10]. Studia Psychologiczne43(2) 59–73.

  • Lakoff G. & Johnson M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.

  • Lapsley D. K. & Lasky B. (2001). Prototypic moral character. Identity: An International Journal of Theory and Research1(4) 345–363. doi:10.1207/S1532706XID0104_03

  • Levin I. & Bekerman-Greenberg R. (1979). Moral judgment and moral behavior in sharing: A developmental analysis. Israeli Journal of Psychology & Counseling in Education11 24–34.

  • Littlemore J. & Low G. (2006). Metaphoric competence second language learning and communicative language ability. Applied Linguistics27(2) 268–294.

  • Markman A. B. & Gentner D. (1990). Analogical mapping during similarity judgments (Ed.) Proceedings of the twelfth annual conference of the cognitive science society (pp. 38–44). Cambridge MA: Cognitive Science Society.

  • Matheson J. L. & McCollum E. E. (2008). Using metaphors to explore the experiences of powerlessness among women in 12-step recovery. Substance Use & Misuse43(8–9) 1027–1044. doi:10.1080/10826080801914287

  • Nippold M. A. & Fey S. H. (1983). Metaphoric understanding in preadolescents having a history of language acquisition difficulties. Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools14(3) 171–180. doi:10.1044/0161-1461.1403.171

  • Noveck I. A. Bianco M. & Castry A. (2001). The costs and benefits of metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol16(1–2) 109–121. doi:10.1080/10926488.2001.9678889

  • Ortony A. (1979). Beyond literal similarity. Psychological Review86(3) 161–180. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.86.3.161

  • Ortony A. (Ed.). (1993). Metaphor and thought (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Ortony A. Vondruska R. J. Foss M. A. & Jones L. (1985). Salience similes and the asymmetry of similarity. Journal of Memory and Language24(5) 569–594. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(85)90047-6

  • Peterson L. (1980). Developmental changes in verbal and behavioral sensitivity to cues of social norms of altruism. Child Development51(3) 830–838. doi:10.2307/1129471

  • Peterson L. Hartmann D. P. & Gelfand D. M. (1977). Developmental changes in the effects of dependency and reciprocity cues on children’s moral judgments and donation rates. Child Development48(4) 1331–1339. doi:10.2307/1128491

  • Pisula E. (2003). Cognitive and social aspects of communication deficits in children with autism. Psychology of Language and Communication7(2) 49–67.

  • Pizarro D. A. & Tannenbaum D. (2011). Bringing character back: How the motivation to evaluate character influences judgments of moral blame. In P. Shaver & M. Mikulincer (Eds.) The social psychology of morality: Exploring the causes of good and evil (pp. 91–108). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.

  • Ricoeur P. (1978). Metaphorical process as cognition imagination and feeling. Critical Inquiry5(1) 143–159. doi:10.1086/447977

  • Rudnicka E. (2004). Znaczenie metaforyczne w polskiej tradycji słownikarskiej: Studium leksykologiczno-leksykograficzne. [Metaphorical significance in Polish dictionary tradition: Lexicological and lexicographical study]. Warszawa: Semper.

  • Saltzstein H. D. & Weiner A. S. (1982). Moral intentionality: Children’s representation of adult judgments and attribution processes. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychology Association Washington DC.

  • Shure M. B. (1968). Fairness generosity and selfishness: The naive psychology of children and young adults. Child Development39(3) 875–886. doi:10.2307/1126990

  • Sims S. A. (1978). Sharing by children: Effects of behavioral example induction and resources. The Journal of Psychology100(1) 57–65. doi:10.1080/00223980.1978.9923471

  • Skitka L. J. (2010). The psychology of moral conviction. Social and Personality Psychology Compass4(4) 267–281. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00254.x

  • Smith C. L. Gelfand D. M. Hartmann D. P. & Partlow M. E. (1979). Children’s causal attributions regarding help giving. Child Development50(1) 203–210. doi:10.2307/1129057

  • Tannenbaum D. Uhlmann E. L. & Diermeier D. (2011). Moral signals public outrage and immaterial harms. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology47(6) 1249–1254. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2011.05.010

  • Walker L. J. & Hennig K. H. (2004). Differing conceptions of moral exemplarity: Just brave and caring. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology86(4) 629. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.86.4.629

  • Weiss R. J. (1982). Understanding moral thought: Effects on moral reasoning and decision making. Developmental Psychology18(6) 852. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.18.6.852

  • Woolfolk R. L. Doris J. M. & Darley J. M. (2006). Identification situational constraint and social cognition: Studies in the attribution of moral responsibility. Cognition100 283-301. doi:16/j.cognition.2005.05.002

  • Veale T. & Hao Y. (2007). Learning to understand figurative language: From similes to metaphors to irony. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society29(29) 683–688.

  • Ybarra O. Chan E. Park D. (2001). Young and old adults’ concerns about morality and competence. Motivation and Emotion. 25(2) 85–100.

  • Young L. & Saxe R. (2011). When ignorance is no excuse: Different roles for intent across moral domains. Cognition120(2) 202–214. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2011.04.005

Search
Journal information
Impact Factor


CiteScore 2018: 0.29

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.118
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.410

Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 12 12 12
PDF Downloads 15 15 15