The Spanish Verbs Estar (To Be) and Ser (To Be) in Child-Directed Speech

Open access

Abstract

The verbs ser and estar have been a subject of great debate in the literature, mainly because the adjectives that are combined with each copula are not in complementary distribution. A cognitive linguistics approach proposes that estar allows for a comparison of the entity referred to by the utterance’s subject and that very same entity that goes through a temporal change; on the other hand, ser allows for a comparison among entities of different type (Delbecque, 1997). I provide an analysis of spontaneous child-directed speech from a longitudinal database and find variation sets that may allow children to detect the differences between ser and estar. In child-directed speech, the entities referred to by the subject of a sentence with estar are always entities that undergo a perceptible change within an activity of daily life, while the entities referred to with ser never undergo a change.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Alameda J. R. & Cuetos F. (1995). Diccionario de frecuencias de las unidades lingüísticas del castellano [Dictionary of the linguistic unities’ frequencies in Castilian Spanish]. Oviedo: Universidad de Oviedo.

  • Alonqueo P. & Soto P. (2016). Infancia y Aprendizaje. Journal for the Study of Education and Development3702. doi:10.1174/021037003321827803

  • Álvarez López E. (2004). La adquisición temprana del adjetivo en niños hispanohablantes [The early acquisition of adjectives in Spanish speaking children]. Mexico City: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.

  • Bello A. & Cuervo R. J. (1945). Gramática de la lengua castellana : destinada al uso de los americanos [Grammar of the Castilian language: intended for the use of Americans]. Buenos Aires: Sopena.

  • Bybee J. (1995). Regular morphology and the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes10(5) 425–455. doi: 10.1080/01690969508407111

  • Cameron-Faulkner T. Lieven E. & Tomasello M. (2003). A construction based analysis of child directed speech. Cognitive Science27(6) 843–873. doi:10.1016/j.cogsci.2003.06.001

  • Clements J. C. (1988). The semantics and pragmatics of the Spanish construction. Linguistics26 779–822. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004

  • Clements J. C. (2005). ‘Ser’ and ‘estar’ in the predicate adjective construction. In Clancy Clements (Ed.) Functional Approaches to Spanish Syntax: Lexical Semantics Discourse and Transitivity (pp. 161–202). London: Palgrave-Macmillan.

  • de León L. (2012). Multiparty participation frameworks in language socialization. In S. Duranti E. Ochs & B. Schieffelin (Eds.) Handbook of Language Socialization (pp. 81–111). Malden M.A.: Wiley-Blackwell.

  • de Marneffe M. -C. Grimm S. Arnon I. Kirby S. & Bresnan J. (2012). A statistical model of the grammatical choices in child production of dative sentences. Language and Cognitive Processes27(931849424) 25–61. doi: 10.1080/01690965.2010.542651

  • Delbecque N. (1997). The Spanish copulas SER and ESTAR. In M. Verspoor K. D. Lee & E. Sweetser (Eds.) Lexical and Syntactical Constructions and the Construction Meaning. Proceedings of the bi-annual ICLA Meeting in Albuquerque (Vol. 150 pp. 247–270). Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

  • Espinosa-Ochoa M. R. (2001). Mirando a través de la misma ventana: sobre la infuencia del habla materna en el proceso de adquisición de los demostrativos [Looking through the same window: the influence of mothers in the process of the acquisition of demonstratives]. Lingüística13 159–178.

  • Fernández Leborans M. J. (1999). La predicación: las oraciones copulativas [The predicatives: the copulative sentences]. In I. Bosque & V. Demonte (Eds.) Gramática Descriptiva de la lengua española. Las construcciones sintácticas fundamentales. Relaciones temporales aspectuales y modales (pp. 2359–2523). Madrid: Espasa.

  • Hamblin C. L. (1973). Questions in Montague English. Foundations of Language10(1) 41–53. doi: 10.1007/sl0624-005-2562-y

  • Hanks W. F. (1990). Referential practice: Interaction and space among the Mayas. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

  • Hernández Pina F. (1984). Teorías psico-sociolingüísticas y su aplicación a la adquisición del español como lengua materna [Psycho-sociolinguistic theories and their application to the acquisition of Spanish as native language]. Madrid: Siglo XXI de España editores.

  • Krifka M. (2008). Basic notions of information structure. Acta Linguistica Hungarica55(3) 243–276. doi: 10.1556/ALing.55.2008.3-4.2

  • Küntay A. & Slobin D. I. (1996). Listening to a Turkish mother: some puzzles for acquisition. In Social Interaction Social Context and Language (pp. 265–286). Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

  • Langacker R. W. (1987). Nouns and verbs. Language63(3) 53–94.

  • Leonard L. B. (2011). The primacy of priming in grammatical learning and intervention: A tutorial. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research54(2) 608–621. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2010/10-0122)

  • Lieven E. (2008). Learning the English auxiliary. Corpora in Language Acquisition Research: History Methods Perspectives6 61–98.

  • Ochs E. & Schieffelin B. (1984) Language acquisition and socialization. In R. Levine & R. Schweder (Eds.) Culture Theory: Essays on Mind Self and Emotion (pp. 276–320). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Pérez Jiménez I. Leonetti M. & Gumiel S. (Eds.) (2015). New perspectives in the study of ser and estar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

  • Ponce-Romero X. T. (2008). La adquisición temprana de los verbos ser y estar en español. Mexico City: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Retrieved from http://132.248.9.195/ptd2009/enero/0638964/Index.html

  • Pye C. Pfeiler B de León L. Brown P. & Mateo P. (2007). A comparative study of Mayan children’s early verb forms. In B. Pfeiler (Ed.) Learning indigenous languages (pp. 15–46). Hannover: Verlag für Ethnologie.

  • Real Academia Espannola: Banco de datos [Bank of data] (CREA) [on-line]. Corpus de referencia del español actual [Corpus of reference of actual Spanish]. <http://www.rae.es>

  • Requena P. E. Román-Hernández A. I. & Miller K. (2014). Children’s knowledge of the Spanish copulas ser and estar with novel adjectives. Language Acquisition22(2) 193–207. 10.1080/10489223.2014.928299

  • Rojas-Nieto C. (2007). La base de datos ETAL. Origen descripción y metas de un proyecto. In Jornadas Filológicas 2005 (pp. 571–601). Mexico City: Instituto de Investigaciones Filológicas-UNAM.

  • Rojas-Nieto C. (2014). Verb sequences and early verb inflection in Spanish: Frequency patterning and possible effects. Language Interaction and Acquisition5(1) 82–99. doi:10.1075/lia.5.1.04roj

  • Rowland C. Fletcher S. & Freudenthal D. (2008) How big is enough? Assessing the reliability of data from naturalistic samples. In H. Behrens (Ed.) Corpora in language acquisition research: finding structure in data (pp. 1–24). Amsterdam: Benjamins.

  • Savage C. Lieven E. Theakston A. & Tomasello M. (2006) Structural priming as implicit learning in language acquisition: The persistence of lexical and structural priming in 4-year-olds. Language Learning and Development2(1) 27-49. doi: 10.1207/s15473341lld0201_2

  • Schmitt C. & Miller K. (2007). Making discourse-dependent decisions: The case of the copulas ser and estar in Spanish. Lingua117(11) 1907–1929. doi:10.1016/j.lingua.2006.11.007

  • Sera M. D. (1992). To Be or to be: Use and acquisition of Spanish copulas. Journal of Memory and Language31 408–427.

  • Silva-Corvalán C. & Montanari S. (2008). The acquisition of serestar (and be) by a Spanish–English bilingual child: The early stages. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition11(3) 341–360. doi: 10.1017/S136672890800357X

  • Thompson S. (1988). A discourse approach to the cross-linguistics category ‘adjective’. In J.A. Hawkins (Ed.) Explaining language universals (pp. 67–185). Oxford: Basil. Blackwell.

  • Vendler Z. (1957). Verbs and times. The Philosophical Review66(2) 143-160.

  • Yont K. M. Snow C. E. & Vernon-Feagans L. (2003). The role of context in mother-child interactions: An analysis of communicative intents expressed during toy play and book reading with 12-month-olds. Journal of Pragmatics35(3) 435–454. doi:10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00144-3

Search
Journal information
Impact Factor


CiteScore 2018: 0.29

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.118
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.410

Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 38 38 8
PDF Downloads 28 28 7