A Short Etude on Irony in Storytelling

Open access


This paper presents an overview of chosen concepts of irony as a communicative unit in the repertoire of the speaker. It adopts a framework of narration with emphasis on how minds in interactions co-construct meanings. Irony, which means more than it says, is always used with a specific attitude attached. Irony is thus an act of narrating the speakers’ mind, but in the speaker-hearer meaning perspective.

Due to the fact that there is no narration without a text and no irony without narration, this paper links the Theory of Narrative Line and Narrative Field (Bokus, 1991, 1996, 1998) with a few selected views on the theory of irony (e.g., Clark and Gerrig, 1984; Sperber and Wilson, 1981, 1984) and research results. It also explains how the Cooperation Principle (Grice, 1975) is flouted and again recreated in the process of sharing meanings. Further, we refer to linguistic bias (Maass et al., 1989) and highlight perspective shifting in narration, which can change along the ‘narrative line’ and within the ‘narrative field.’

This paper builds a platform for combining the theories of irony with fields of narration. This perspective situates irony as a vehicle hinged in dialectics between the explicit and the implicit, the like and the dislike, the truth and the falsehood, the praise and the criticism. All of these can be read from irony.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Alba Juez L. (1995).Verbal Irony and the Maxims of Grice's Cooperative Principle. Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses8 25–30.

  • Akimoto Y. & Miyazawa S. (2017). Individual Differences in Irony Use Depend on Context. Journal of Language and Social Psychology36(6) 675–693.

  • Anolli L. Ciceri R. & Infantino M. G. (2002). From” blame by praise” to” praise by blame”: Analysis of vocal patt erns in ironic communication. International Journal of Psychology37(5) 266–276.

  • Astington J. W. (2003). Sometimes necessary never sufficient: False-belief understanding and social competence. In B. Repacholi & V. Slaughter (Eds.) Individual differences in theory of mind: Implications for typical and atypical development (pp. 13–38). New York NY: Psychology Press.

  • Attardo S. (1998). Irony as relevant inappropriateness. Journal of Pragmatics32 793–826.

  • Baron-Cohen S Leslie A. M. & Frith U. (October 1985). Does the autistic child have a "theory of mind"?. Cognition21(1) 37–46.

  • Berman R. A. & Katzenberger I. 2004. Form and function in introducing narrative and expository texts: A developmental perspective. Discourse Processes38(1) 57–94.

  • Berman R. A. (1995). Narrative competence and storytelling performance: How children tell stories in different contexts. Journal of narrative and life history5(4) 285 –313.

  • Blum-Kulka S. (1997) Dinner talk: Cultural patterns of sociability and socialization in family discourse. Mahwah NJ: Erlbaum.

  • Bokus B. (2004). Inter-mind phenomena in child narrative discourse. Pragmatics14(4) 391–408.

  • Bokus B. (2000). Światy fabuły w narracji dziecięcej (Story worlds in child narration). Warszawa: Energeia.

  • Bokus B. (1998). Pole narracji: pejzaż akcji i pejzaż świadomości w opowiadaniach dziecięcych (The narrative field: landscape of action and landscape of cosciousness in children’s stories). In: M. Smoczyńska (Ed.) Studia z psychologii rozwojowej i psycholingwistyki (Studies in the developmnetal psychology and psycholinguistics) (pp. 211–217). Kraków: Universitas.

  • Bokus B. & Shugar G. W. (1998). Social structures of children’s narrational activity. Psychology of Language and Communication2(1) 75–81.

  • Bokus B. (1996). Narrative space structuring at the preschool age. Findings on monologic and dialogic discourse. In: C. E. Johnson & J. H. V. Gilbert (Eds.) Children’s language (vol. 9 pp 197–207). Mahvah NJ: Erlbaum.

  • Bokus B. (1991). Children’s pragmatic knowledge of narrative tasks. In: J. Verschueren (Ed.) Pragmatics at Issue Part I (pp. 13–28). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

  • Brown P. & Levinson S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

  • Bruntsch R. & Ruch W. (2017). Studying irony detection beyond ironic criticism: Let's include ironic praise. Frontiers of Psychology. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00606

  • Bülow P.H. (2004). Sharing experiences of contested illness by storytelling. Discourse and Society15(1) 33–53.

  • Clark H. & Gerrig R. (1984). On the pretense theory of irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Genral113 121–126. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.113.1.121

  • Colston H. L. & Lee S. Y. (2004). Gender differences in verbal irony use. Metaphor and Symbol19(4) 289–306.

  • Cuff E. C. & Hustler D. (1981). Adult-child conversation. London: Croom Helm.

  • Dews S. Kaplan J. & Winner E. (1995). Why not say it directly? The social functions of irony. Discourse Process. 19 347–367. doi: 10.1080/01638539509544922

  • Dynel M. & Meibauer J. (2016). Everything You always wanted to know about the pragmatics of deception but were afraid to test. International Review of Pragmatics8(2) 163–178.

  • Dynel. M. (2016). Killing Two birds with one deceit. Deception in multi-party interaction. International Review of Pragmatics8(2) 179–218.

  • Garmendia J. (2010). Irony is critical. Pragmatcs & Cognition18 397–421. doi:10.1075/pc.18.2.07gar

  • Garmendia J. (2013). Ironically saying and implicating. What Is Said and What Is Not. The Semantics/Pragmatics Interface 225–24.

  • Gibbs R. W. (2000). Irony in talk among friends. Metaphor and Symbol15 (1–2) 5–27.

  • Gibbs R. W. (1986). On the psycholinguistics of sarcasm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General115 3–15.

  • Gibbs R.W. (1994). The poetics of mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Giora R. (1997). Understanding figurative and literal language: The graded salience hypothesis. Cognitive Linguistics8(3)183–206

  • Giora R. (1995). On irony and negation. Discourse Process19 239–264. doi:10.1080/01638539509544916

  • Guimond S. Chatard A. Martinot D. Crisp R. J. & Redersdorff S. (2006). Social comparison self-stereotyping and gender differences in self- construals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology90(2) 221–242. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.90.2.221

  • Grice H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole and J. L. Morgan (Eds.) Syntax and Semantics Vol. 3: Speech Acts (pp. 41–58). New York NY: Academic Press.

  • Halliday M. A. K. (1975). Learning how to mean: Explorations in the development of language. New York NY: Elsevier.

  • Haverkate Henk 1990. A speech act analysis of irony. Journal of Pragmatics14(1) 77–109.

  • Ivanko S. L. Pexman P. M. & Olineck K. M. (2004). How sarcastic are you? Individual differences and verbal irony. Journal of Language & Social Psychology23 244–271.

  • Katz A. Piasecka I. & Toplak M. (November 2001). Comprehending the sarcastic comments of males and females. Paper presented at the 42nd Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society Orlando FL.

  • Keenan E. (1974). Conversational competence in children. Journal of Child Language1 163–183.

  • Keltner D. Capps L. Kring A. M. Young R. C. & Heerey E. A. (2001). Just teasing: a conceptual analysis and empirical review. Psychological Bulletin127 229–248. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.127.2.229

  • Kemper S. (1984). The development of narrative skills: Explanations and entertainments. In Discourse development (pp. 99-124). Springer New York NY.

  • Kotthoff H. (2003). Responding to irony in diff erent contexts: On cognition in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics35(9) 1387–1411.

  • Kreuz R.J. & Link K.E. (2002). Asymmetries in the Use of Verbal Irony. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 21(2):127–143.

  • Kreuz R.J. &R. Roberts. 1993. On satire and parody: The importance of being ironic. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity (8) 97–109.

  • Kumon-Nakamura S. Glucksberg S. & Brown M. (1995). How about another piece of pie: the allusional pretense theory of discourse irony. Journal Experimental Psycholgy: General124 3–21. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.124.1.3

  • Labov W. (1972). Language in the Inner City: Studies in the Black English Vernacular. Philadelphia PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.

  • Leech G. N. (1983). Principles of Pragmatics. New York NY: Longman

  • Li X. (2008). A Cross-Cultural Exploration of Situational Irony in China and the United States. Sino-Platonic Papers184.

  • Maass A. Salvi D. Acuri L. & Semin G. R. (1989). Language use in intergroup contexts: the linguistic intergroup bias. Jouranl of Personality and Social Psychology57 981–993. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.981

  • Milanowicz A. Tarnowski A. & Bokus B. (2017). When sugar-coated words taste dry: The relationship between gender anxiety and response to irony. Fronters of Psycholgy. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02215

  • Milanowicz A. & Bokus B. (2013). Gender and moral judgments: the role of who is speaking to whom. Journal of Gender Studies22 423–443. doi: 10.1080/09589236.2012.719314

  • Muecke D. (1970). Irony. Norfolk Fakenham: Methuen & Co Ltd.

  • Myers Roy A. (1977). Towards a definition of irony. In: R. W. Fasold & R. Shuy (Eds.) Studies in language variation (pp. 171–183). Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.

  • Norrick N. R. (1994). Involvement and joking in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics22 409–430. doi: 10.1016/0378-2166(94)90117-1

  • Norrick N. R. (2007). Conversational storytelling. In: D.Herman (Ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Narrative (pp. 127–141). Cambridge Univeristy Press.

  • Pexman P. M. & Olineck K. M. (2002). Does sarcasm always sting? Investigating the impact of ironic insults and ironic compliments. Discourse Processes33 199–217.

  • Psathas G. (1968). Comment. American Psychologist23 135–137

  • Sperber D. & Wilson D. (1981). Irony and the use-mention distinction. In P. Cole (Ed.) Radical Pragmatics (pp. 295–318) New York NY: Academic Press.

  • Sperber D. & Wilson D. (1984). Pragmatics: an overview. In S. Georges (Ed.) From the Lingusistics to the Social Context (pp. 21–41). Bologna: Cooperativa Libraria Universitaria Editrice.

  • Schwoebel J. Dews S. Winner E. & Srinivas K. (2000). Obligatory processing of the literal meaning of ironic utterances: further evidence. Metaphor Symbol15 47–61. doi:10.1080/10926488.2000.9678864

  • Spotorno N. Koun E. Prado J. Van Der Henst J.B.& Noveck I.A.(2012). Neural evidence that utterance-processing entails mentalizing: the case of irony. Neuroimage63(1) 25–39. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.06.046.

  • Todorov A. Said C. P. Engell A. D. & Oosterhof N. N. (2008). Understanding evaluation of faces on social dimensions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences12(12) 455–460.

  • Weir R. (1960). Language in the crib. The Hague: Mouton.

  • Wigboldus D. H. J. & Douglas K. (2007). Language stereotypes and intergroup relations. In K. Fiedler (Ed.) Social communication (pp. 79–106). New York NY: Psychology Press.

  • Wigboldus D. H. J. Spears R. & Semin G. R. (2005). When do we communicate stereotypes? Influence of the social context on the linguistic expectancy bias. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations8(3) 215-230. doi:10.1177/1368430205053939

  • Wimmer H. & Perner J. (1983). Beliefs about beliefs: representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children’s understanding of deception. Cognition13 103–128.

  • Winner E. Brownell H. Happé F. Blum A. & Pincus D. (1998). Distinguishing lies from 5 jokes: Theory of mind deficits and discourse interpretation in right hemisphere brain- 6 damaged patients. Brain and Language62 89–106. doi:10.1006/brln.1997.1889

  • Wolniewicz B. (2012). O pojęciu Kłamstwa i Zasadzie Prawdomówności. Edukacja Filozoficzna54 1–23.

  • Vrij A. (2006). Detecting Lies and Deceit. Pitfalls and Opportunities. 2nd ed. Chichester: John Wiley.

Journal information
Impact Factor

CiteScore 2018: 0.29

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.118
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.410

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 183 183 21
PDF Downloads 152 152 17