From Pre-Grammaticality to Proficiency in L1: Acquiring and Developing Infinitival Usage in Hebrew

Open access


The study traces the developmental route in acquisition and use of infinitives (e.g., lišon ‘to sleep’, le-exol ‘to-eat’, la-asot ’to-do’) in Hebrew as a first language, proceeding from the initial, “pre-grammatical“ emergence of linguistic forms among toddlers to structure-based knowledge and proficient use of the same devices in adolescence. Analysis involves a varied data-base of L1 oral Hebrew usage in: parent-child interactions of children aged 1;6 to 3;0 years; elicited storybook-based narratives of preschoolers; and personal-experience narratives and expository talks of schoolchildren, adolescents, and adults. Findings show that infinitives constitute an interesting test-case for examining the route from initial emergence via acquisition to maturely proficient command of a given subsystem in L1. Infinitival structures in Modern Hebrew, a language with an impoverished system of nonfinite verbs and lacking in auxiliaries of the kind common in Standard Average European, reveal a long developmental path, showing increasing complexity at all levels of language use: morphological form, types of syntactic constructions, semantic content, and discursive function, the latter primarily for the purpose of achieving textual connectivity.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Adam G. & Bat-El O. (2008). Morphological knowledge without morphological structure. Current Issues in Generative Hebrew Linguistics 134 197.

  • Azar M. (1977). Surface and depth in syntax. Haifa: Haifa University Press [in Hebrew].

  • Berman R. A. (1978a). Modern Hebrew structure. Tel Aviv: University Publishing Projects.

  • Berman R. A. (1978b). Early verbs: How and why a child uses her first words. International Journal of Psycholinguistics 5 21-29.

  • Berman R. A. (1980). On the category of auxiliary in Modern Hebrew. Hebrew Annual Review 4 15-37.

  • Berman R. A. (1981). Language development and language knowledge: Evidence from the acquisition of Hebrew morphophonology. Journal of Child Language 8(3) 609-626.

  • Berman R. A. (1985). Acquisition of Hebrew. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. [Also in D. I. Slobin (Ed.) Crosslinguistic study of language acquisition (vol. I pp. 255-371). Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum]

  • Berman R. A. (1986). A step-by-step model of language learning. In I. Levin (Ed.) Stage and structure: Re-opening the debate (pp. 191-219). Norwood NJ: Ablex.

  • Berman R. A. (1988). On the ability to relate events in narratives. Discourse Processes 11 469-97.

  • Berman R. A. (1993). Developmental perspectives on transitivity: A confluence of cues. In Y. Levy (Ed.) Other children other languages: Issues in the Theory of Acquisition (pp. 189-241). Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

  • Berman R. A. (1996). Form and function in developing narrative abilities: The case of ‘and’. In D. Slobin J. Gerhardt A. Kyratzis & J. Guo (Eds.) Social interaction context and language: Essays in honor of Susan Ervin-Tripp (pp. 343-367). Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

  • Berman R. A. (2001). Setting the narrative scene: How children begin to tell a story. In A. Aksu-Koç C. Johnson & K. Nelson (Eds.) Children’s language (vol. 10 pp. 1-31). Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

  • Berman R. A. (2004a). Between emergence and mastery: The long developmental route of language acquisition. In R. A. Berman (Ed.) Language development across childhood and adolescence (Trends in language acquisition research [TILAR]) (vol. 3 pp. 9-34). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

  • Berman R. A. (2004b). The role of context in developing narrative abilities. In S. Strömqvist & L. Verhoeven (Eds.) Relating events in narrative: Typological and contextual perspectives (pp. 261-280). Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

  • Berman R. A. (2008). The psycholinguistics of developing text construction. Journal of Child Language 35 735-771.

  • Berman R. A. (2014). Acquiring and expressing temporality in Hebrew: A T/ (M/A) Language. SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics 11(2) 2-29.

  • Berman R. A. (2017). Usage-based perspectives on form-function relations: The case of nonfinite verbs in Modern Hebrew. Keynote talk 3rd Usage-Based Linguistics Conference Hebrew University Jerusalem July.

  • Berman R. A & Armon-Lotem S. (1997). How grammatical are early verbs? In C. Martinot (Ed.) Annales littéraires de l’Université de Franche-Comté: Actes du colloque international sur l’acquisition de la syntaxe (pp. 17-60).

  • Berman R. A. & Neeman Y. (1994). Development of linguistic forms: Hebrew. In R. A. Berman & D. I. Slobin (Eds.) Relating events in narrative: A crosslinguistic developmental study (pp. 285-328). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.

  • Berman R. A. & Nir-Sagiv B. (2009). Clause-packaging in narratives: A crosslinguistic developmental study. In J. Guo E. Lieven N. Budwig S. Ervin-Tripp K. Nakamura & S. Ozcaliskan (Eds.) Crosslinguistic approaches to the psychology of language: Research in the tradition of Dan I. Slobin (pp. 149-162). New Zork NY: Taylor & Francis.

  • Berman R. A. & Slobin D. I. (1994). Relating events in narrative: A crosslinguistic developmental study. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

  • Berman R. A. & Verhoeven L. (2002). Developing text production abilities in speech and writing: Aims and methodology. Written Languages and Literacy 5 1-44.

  • Blau J. (1966). Essentials of syntax. Jerusalem: Israel Institute for Writing Education [in Hebrew].

  • Bloom L. Tackeff J. & Lahey M. (1984). Learning to in complement constructions. Journal of Child Language 11(2) 391-406.

  • Bowerman M. (2011). Linguistic typology and first language acquisition. In J. J. Song (Ed.) The Oxford handbook of linguistic typology (pp. 591-617). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • de Villiers J. G. & de Villiers P. A. (1986). The acquisition of English. The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition 1 27-139.

  • Dekel N. (2010). A matter of time: tense mood and aspect in spontaneous Spoken Israeli Hebrew. Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics.

  • Diessel H. (2004). The acquisition of complex sentences (Vol. 105). Cambridge: University Press.

  • Dromi E. & Berman R. A. (1986). Language-general and language-specific in developing syntax. Journal of Child Language 14 371-387.

  • Dubnov K. (2015). Circumstantial versus depictive secondary predicates in literary Hebrew - the influence of Yiddish and Russian. In E. Doron (Ed.) Language contact and the development of Modern Hebrew (pp. 77-86). Leiden: Brill.

  • Evans N. (2007). Insubordination and its uses. In I. Nikolaeva (Ed.). Finiteness: Theoretical and empirical foundations (pp. 367-431). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Evans N. & Watanabe H. (Eds.). (2016). Dynamics of insubordination. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

  • Faust N. (submitted). Gutturals in Modern Hebrew. To appear in R. A. Berman & E. Grossman (Eds.) A usage based reference grammar of Modern Hebrew. Berlin: Mouton De-Gruyter.

  • Givón T. (2009). The genesis of syntactic complexity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

  • Goldfajn T. (1998). Word order and time in Biblical Hebrew narrative. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

  • Jakobson R. (1960). Closing statement: Linguistics and poetics. In T. A. Sebeok (Ed.) Style in language (pp. 350-377). Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

  • Johnstone B. (1987). Parataxis in Arabic: Modification as a model for persuasion. Studies in Language 11 85-98.

  • Kalev D. (2017a). Modern times-tenses: Grammaticization of the anterior in contemporary Hebrew. In A. Amit & H. B. Z. Shyldkrot (Eds.) Proceedings of the 29th and 30th Annual Conferences of the Israel Linguistic Society 20 51-60.[In Hebrew]

  • Kalev D. (2017b). Relative tenses in Hebrew: Anterior and posterior. In A. Amit & H. B. Z. Shyldkrot (Eds.) Proceedings of the 31st and 32nd Annual Conferences of the Israel Linguistic Society 21 20-40. [In Hebrew]

  • Kaplan D. & Berman R. A. (2015). Developing linguistic flexibility across the school years. First Language 35 27-53.

  • Karmiloff-smith A. (1985). Language and cognitive processes from a developmental perspective. Language and Cognitive Processes 1 61-85. DOI: 10.1080/01690968508402071

  • Karmiloff-Smith A. (1995). Beyond modularity: A developmental perspective on cognitive science. Cambridge MA: MIT press.

  • Lustigman L. (2012). Non-finiteness in early Hebrew verbs. Brill’s Annual of Afroasiatic Languages and Linguistics (BAALL) 4 213-231.

  • Lustigman L. (2013). Developing structural specification: Productivity in early Hebrew verb usage. First Language 33 47-67.

  • Lustigman L. (2015). Optional opacity: A syntactically-based analysis of early Hebrew verb morphology. First Language 35 466-488.

  • Lustigman L. (2016a). From opacity to transparency: Transitional categories in early Hebrew grammar. In R. A. Berman (Ed.) Acquisition and Development of Hebrew: From infancy to adolescence (Trends in Language Acquisition Research [TILAR]) (vol. 19 pp. 225-258). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

  • Lustigman L. (2016b). Interfaces between linguistic systems: Evidence from child language. Linguistics 54 273-303.

  • Lustigman L. & Berman R. A. (2016). Form and function in early clause-combining. Journal of Child Language 43 157-185.

  • Nir-Sagiv B. & Berman R. A. (2010). Complex syntax as a window on contrastive rhetoric. Journal of Pragmatics 42 744-765.

  • Ostler Shirley E. 1987. English in parallels: A comparison of English and Arabic prose. In: Connor U. & Kaplan R. (Eds.) Writing across languages: Analysis of L2 texts (pp. 169-185). Reading MA: Addison Wesley.

  • Ostler S. E. (1988). A study in the contrastive rhetoric of Arabic English Japanese and Spanish. Doctoral Dissertation. University of Southern California.

  • Polak F. H. (1998). The oral and the written: Syntax stylistics and the development of Biblical prose narrative. Journal of the Ancient Near Eastern Society 26 59-105.

  • Ravid D. (1995). Language change in child and adult Hebrew: A psycholinguistic perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Ravid D. (2003). A developmental perspective on root perception in Hebrew and Palestinian Arabic. Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 28 293-320.

  • Ravid D. Ashkenazi O. Levie R. Ben Zadok G. Grunwald T. Bratslavsky R. & Gillis S. (2016). Foundations of the root category: analyses of linguistic input to Hebrew-speaking children. In R. A. Berman (Ed.) Acquisition and Development of Hebrew: From Infancy to Adolescence (Trends in Language Acquisition Research [TILAR]) (vol. 19 pp. 95-134). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

  • Ravid D. & Cahana-Amitay D. (2005). Verbal and nominal expression in narrating conflict situations in Hebrew. Journal of Pragmatics 37 157-183.

  • Ravid D. & Tolchinsky L. (2002). Developing linguistic literacy: A comprehensive model. Journal of Child Language 29 419-448.

  • Reilly J. S. Jisa H. Baruch E. & Berman R. A. (2002). Modal expression of propositional attitudes. Written Languages and Literacy 5(2) 183-218.

  • Reinhart T. (1984). Principles of gestalt perception in the temporal organization of narrative texts. Linguistics 22(6) 779-810.

  • Rubinstein E. (1980). Contemporary Hebrew and Ancient Hebrew. Tel Aviv: University on the Air [in Hebrew].

  • Schwarzwald O. (2003). Opacity in Hebrew word morphology. In J. Shimron (Ed.) Language processing and acquisition in languages of Semitic root-based morphology (pp. 147-163). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

  • Seroussi B. (2014). Root transparency and the morphology-meaning interface: Data from Hebrew. In F. Rainer F. Gardani H. C. Luschützky & W. U. Dressler (Eds.) Morphology and Meaning [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 327] (pp. 289-301). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

  • Slobin D. I. (1996). From "thought and language" to "thinking to speaking". In J. J. Gumperz & S. C. Levinson (Eds.) Rethinking linguistic relativity (pp. 70-96). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Slobin D. I. (2004). The many ways to search for a frog. In S. Strömqvist & L. Verhoeven (Eds.) Relating events in narrative: Typological and contextual perspectives (vol 2 pp. 219-257). Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

  • Slobin D. I. Bowerman M. Brown P. Eisenbeiss S. & Narasimhan B. (2011). Putting things in places: Developmental consequences of linguistic typology. In J. Bohnemeyer & E. Pederson (Eds.) Event representation in language and cognition (pp. 134-165). New York NY: Cambridge University Press.

  • Tomasello M. (2009). Constructing a language. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.

  • Waltke B. K. & O'Connor M. P. (1990). An introduction to Biblical Hebrew syntax. Winona Lake Ind: Eisenbrauns.

Journal information
Impact Factor

CiteScore 2018: 0.29

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.118
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.410

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 139 139 5
PDF Downloads 107 107 6