Among a number of teaching practices, personalized education is gaining in popularity owing to its enticing appeal of a novel, humanistic attitude with unparalleled pedagogical results unlike those observed in traditional standardized mass education models. As part of the fourth moment in the history of education (according to the timeline in Davis, Sumara and Kapler, 2015), personalized education under the guise of tutoring or educational coaching is boldly re-entering schools and the academic world. Observing the daily practices of tutors and educational coaches on various levels of schooling, we can note a number of features which contribute to the emergence of a model where learning becomes an autonomous, lived experience. In this model communication is understood as a collaborative dialogical practice, which leads us to see learning as a result of interactivity in the learner-tutor dyad afforded by geo-spatial conditions, physio-psychological elements and language. All these contribute to the occurrence of transformative results as evidenced in student post-tutoring narratives. In this paper we present learning in the dialogical tutor-tutee paradigm as a distributed, embodied, and enacted meaning-making process rather than mere ‘sending’ and ‘receiving’ of substantive information (e.g., De Jaegher and DiPaolo, 2007; Neuman and Cowley, 2013). Described as such, the method fits in the paradigm of self-regulated learning. We therefore postulate the claim that personalised education as exemplified by tutoring is co-agential and prompts learning on multiple timescales. Consequently, cognition and learning in tutoring is enactment of knowledge, while coordinating speech rather than knowledge transmission
Cano, F. (2005). Epistemological beliefs and approaches to learning: Their change through secondary school and their influence on academic performance. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 203-221.
Clark, A. (2001). Mindware: An introduction to the philosophy of cognitive science. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Clark, A. (2008). Pressing the flesh: A tension in the study of the embodied, embedded mind. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 76(1), 37-59.
Cowley, S. (2010). Signifying bodies: Biosemiosis, interaction and health. Braga: The Faculty of Philosophy of Braga, Portuguese Catholic University.
Cowley, S. (2011). Taking a language stance. Ecological Psychology, 23(3), 185-209. doi:
Davis, B. (1996). Teaching mathematics: Towards a sound alternative. New York, NY: Garland Publishing Inc. Davis, B. (2013). Teaching mathematics: Toward a sound alternative. New York, NY and London: Taylor and Francis.
Davis, A. B., Sumara, D. J., Kieren, T. E. (1996). Cognition, co-emergence, curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 28(2), 151-170.
De Jaegher, H., Di Paolo, E. (2007). Participatory sense-making: An enactive approach to social cognition. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 6(4), 485-507. doi:
Grabove, V. (1997). The many facets of transformative learning theory and practice. In: P. Cranton (Ed.), Transformative learning in action: insights from practice. New directions for adult and continuing education. no. 74, (pp. 89-96). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. doi:
Hall, L. M., (1996). Languaging: The linguistics of psychotherapy. How language works psycho-therapeutically: an exploration into the art and science of "therapeutic languaging" in four psychotherapies (neuro-linguistic programming, reality therapy, rational-emotive behavior therapy, logotherapy). Using general-semantic formulations. Unpublished PhD diss. The Union Institute.
Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. MIT Press.
Jenkins, H., Clinton, K., Purushotma, R., Robison, A., Weigel, M. (2006). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century. Washington, DC: The John D. and Cathering MacArthur Foundation.
Karpińska-Musiał, B. (2016). Edukacja spersonalizowana w uniwersytecie: Ideologia, instytucja, dydaktyka, tutor. Kraków: Wydawnictwo LIBRON - Filip Lohner.
Linell, P. (1998). Approaching dialogue: Talk, interaction and contexts in dialogical perspectives. Amsterdam, Philadelphia, PA : J. Benjamins Pub. Co. doi:
Littleton, K. N. Mercer (2013). Educational dialogues. In K. Hall, T. Cremin, B. Comber, and L.C. Moll (Eds), International handbook of research on children’s literacy, learning and culture (pp. 291-303). Oxford: Wiley- Blackwell.
Marková, I. (2003). Dialogicality and social representations: The dynamics of mind, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Maturana, H. R., Varela, F. (1988). The tree of knowledge. Boston, MA: Shambhala New Science Library.
Matusov, E. (2009). Journey into dialogic pedagogy. Hauppauge, NY: Nova Publishers.
Matusov, E. Miyazaki, K., (2014). Dialogue on dialogic pedagogy. Dialogic pedagogy vol. 2. Retrieved from https://dpj.pitt.edu/ojs/index.php/dpj1/issue/view/4.
Mercer, N. (2000). Words and minds: How we use language to think together. London: Routledge. doi:
Mercer, N. (2002) Developing dialogues. In G. Wells, ,Claxton, G. L. (Eds), Learning for Life in the 21st Century: sociocultural perspectives on the future of education (viii ed.) (pp. 141-153). Oxford: Blackwell. doi:
Mercer, N., Littleton, K. (2007). Dialogue and the development of children's thinking. New York, NY: Routledge. Mezirow J. (1991). Transformative dimensions of adult learning. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. doi:
Mezirow, J. (1997). Transformative learning: theory to practice. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 74, 5-12.
Mezirow J. (2000). Learning to think like an adult. core concepts of transformation theory. In Mezirow & Asscociates (Eds.), Learning as transformation. critical perspectives on a theory in progress (pp. 3-33), San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Mezirow, J. (2003) Transformative learning as discourse. Journal of Transformative Education, 1, 58-63.
Neber, H., M. Shommer-Aikins (2002). Self-regulated science learning with highly gifted Students: The role of cognitive, motivational, epistemological, and environmental variables. High Ability Studies 13(1) 59-74. doi:
Ormrod, J. E. (2009). Essentials of educational psychology. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education Inc.
Schommer, M. (1998). The role of adults' beliefs about knowledge and learning in school, work, and everyday life. In M. C. Smith,T. Pourchot (Eds.), Adult learning and development: Perspectives from educational psychology (pp. 127-143). Hillside, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Schommer-Aikins, M. (2002). An evolving theoretical framework for an epistemological belief system. In B. Hofer, P. Pintrich (Eds.) Personal epistemology: Th psychology of belief about knowledge and knowing (pp. 103-118). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Schommer-Aikins, M. (2008). Applying the theory of an epistemological belief system to the investigation of students' and professors' mathematical beliefs. In K. Myint Swe (Ed.), Knowing, Knowledge and Beliefs: Epistemological Studies Across Diverse Cultures (pp. 303-323). Netherlands: Springer.
Sidorkin, M., (1999). Dialogue with evil. Faculty Publications. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.ric.edu/facultypublications/19.
Smagorinsky, P. (1998). Thinking and speech and protocol analysis. mind, culture, and activity. 5(3), 157-177. doi:
Steffensen, S. V. (2013). Human interactivity: Problem-solving, solution-probing and verbal patterns in the wild. In S. J. Cowley & F. Vallée-Tourangeau (Eds.), Cognition beyond the brain: Computation, interactivity and human artifice (pp. 195-221). Dordrecht: Springer. doi:
Sumara, J. D., Davis, B. (1997). Enactivist theory and community learning: toward a complexified understanding of action research. Educational Action Research, 5(3), 403-422.
Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development’. In S. Gass, C. Madden, (Eds.) Input in second language acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Swain M. (2006). Languaging, agency and collaboration in advanced second language proficiency. In H. Byrnes. (Ed.), Advanced language learning: The contribution of Halliday and Vygotsky (pp. 95-108). London- New York: Continuum.
Thibault, P. J. (2011). First-order languaging dynamics and second-order language: The distributed language view. Ecological Psychology, 23(1), 1-36. doi: