Metaphorical Association Between Physical and Moral Purity in the Context of One’s Own Transgressions and Immoral Behavior of Others

Martyna Sekulak 1  and Józef Maciuszek 1
  • 1 Jagiellonian University, Institute of Applied Psychology, Łojasiewicza 4, 30-348 , Kraków, Poland

Abstract

The Macbeth effect is a metaphorical association between physical and moral cleanliness - transgression of one’s morality leads to increased desire to clean oneself (Zhong & Liljenquist, 2006). Earlier studies examined psychological associations between bodily and moral purity according to controlled processes, such as rating product desirability. The influence of the Macbeth effect on more automatic processes (stimuli processing speed) was explored in three studies. We examined whether thinking about one’s moral transgression (Studies 1 and 3) or others’ immoral behavior (Study 2) contributed to slower reaction times (RTs) to stimuli related to physical purification. It seems that automatic processes may also be affected by the metaphor “morality is purity”: It is manifested in slower RTs to stimuli associated with bodily cleansing when recalling one’s own past transgressions (Study 3) and in slower responses to words connected with purification of the external world while recalling immoral behaviors of others (Study 2).

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Bukowski, M. (2008). Zastosowanie paradygmatu decyzji leksykalnych do badania aktywizacji stereotypów [Lexical decision task applications to study stereotype activation]. Psychologia Społeczna, 1, 54-63.

  • Chapman, H. A., & Anderson, A. K. (2011). Varieties of moral emotional experience. Emotion Review, 3, 255-257. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Chapman, H. A., Kim, D. A., Susskind, J. M., & Anderson, A. K. (2009). In bad taste: Evidence for the oral origins of moral disgust. Science, 323, 1222- 1226. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Collins, A. M., & Loftus, E. F. (1975). A spreading activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 82, 407-428. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • David, B., & Olatunji, B. O. (2011). The effect of disgust conditioning and disgust sensitivity on appraisals of moral transgressions. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 1142-1146. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Durkheim, E. (1995). The elementary forms of the religious life. New York, NY: The Free Press (Original work published 1912).

  • Dziarnowska, W., & Przybysz, P. (2011). Emocje moralne jako podstawa zmysłu moralnego. Defekty zmysłu moralnego [Moral emotions as the basis of moral sensitivity. Defects of moral sensitivity]. Rocznik Kognitywistyczny, 4, 57-64.

  • Eskine, K. J., Kacinik, N. A., & Prinz, J. J. (2011). A bad taste in the mouth: Gustatory disgust influences moral judgmant. Psychological Science, 22, 295-299. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Fayard, J. V., Bassi, A. K., Bernstein, D. M., & Roberts, B. W. (2009). Is cleanliness next to godliness? Disspelling old wives’ tales: Failure to replicate Zhong and Liljenquist (2006). Journal of Articles in Support of the Null Hypothesis, 6, 21-29.

  • Frank, R. H. (1988). Passions within reason: The strategic role of the emotions. New York, NY: Norton & Co.

  • Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108, 814-834. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Haidt, J. (2003). The moral emotions. In R. J. Davidson, K. R. Scherer, & H. H. Goldsmith (Eds.), Handbook of affective sciences (pp. 852-870). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Haidt, J. (2007, May). The new synthesis in moral psychology. Science, 316(5827), 998-1002. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Huebner, B., Dweyer, S., & Hauser, M. (2008). The role of emotion in moral psychology. Trends in Cognitive Science, 13, 1-6. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). The metaphorical structure of the human conceptual system. Cognitive Science, 4, 195-208. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2010). Metafory w naszym życiu [Metaphors we live by.] Warsaw: Aletheia.

  • Lee, S. W. S., & Schwarz, N. (2010). Dirty hands and dirty mouths: Embodiment of the moral-purity metaphor is specific to the motor modality involved in moral transgression. Psychological Science, 21, 1423-1425. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Lee, S. W. S., & Schwarz, N. (2011). Wiping the slate clean: Psychological consequences of physical cleaning. Psychological Science, 20, 307-311. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Liljenquist, K. Zhong, C. B., & Galinsky, A. D. (2010). The smell of virtue: Clean scents promote reciprocity and charity. Psychological Science, 21, 381-383. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Maciuszek, J. (2004). Metafora jako forma komunikacji perswazyjnej [Metaphor as a form of persuasive communication]. In R. Garpiela, & K. Leszczyńska (Eds.), Sztuka perswazji. Socjologiczne, psychologiczne i lingwistyczne aspekty komunikowania perswazyjnego [The art of persuasion. Sociological, psychological, and linguistic aspects of persuasive communication] (pp. 115-130). Kraków: NOMOS.

  • Maciuszek, J. (2007). Wpływ bezpośrednich i zaprzeczonych dyrektyw na ukierunkowanie uwagi [Influence of direct and negated directives on focusing of attention]. Psychologia Społeczna, 2, 144-163.

  • Maciuszek, J. (2013). Don’t pay attention to what you see! Negative commands and attention bias. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 44, 70-84. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Parzuchowski, M., Bocian, K., & Baryła, W. (2012). Aktywizacja stereotypu osoby niemoralnej nasila motyw czystości [Activation of a stereotype of an immoral person facilitates the cleanliness motive]. Psychologia Społeczna, 4, 297-305.

  • Rai, T. S., & Fiske, A. P. (2011). Moral psychology is relationship regulation: Moral motives for unity, hierarchy, equality, and proportionality. Psychological Review, 118, 57-75. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Rozin, P., Haidt, J., & McCauley, C. R. (2005). Wstręt [Disgust]. In M. Lewis & J. M. Haviland-Jones (Eds.), Psychologia emocji [Psychology of emotion] (pp. 798-819). Gdańsk: GWP.

  • Sachdeva, S., Iliev, R., & Medin, D. L. (2009). Sinning saints and saintly sinners. The paradox of moral self-regulation. Psychological Science, 20, 523-528. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Sassenberg, K., & Moskowitz, G. B. (2005). Don’t stereotype, think different! Overcoming automatic stereotype activation by mindset priming. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 506-514. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Schnall, S., Benton, J., & Harvey, S. (2008). With a clean conscience: Cleanliness reduces the severity of moral judgments. Psychological Science, 19, 1219-1222. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Schnall, S., Haidt, J., Clore, G. L., & Jordan, A. (2008). Disgust as embodied moral judgment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Sinacka-Kubik, E. (2011). Wpływ wstrętu na uprzedzenia etniczne kobiet i mężczyzn [The influence of disgust on ethnic prejudice of women and men]. Psychologia Społeczna, 1, 24-33.

  • Smith, D. L. (2011). Najbardziej niebezpieczne ze zwierząt. Natura ludzka i przyczyny wojen [The most dangerous animal: Human nature and the origins of war]. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo CiS.

  • Świątnicki, K., & Przybyszewski, K. (2014). Przypomnienie o śmierci i fizyczne oczyszczenie się a poparcie idei lustracji [The effects of mortality salience and physical cleansing on support for vetting (or lustration)]. Psychologia Społeczna, 3, 298-310. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Wojciszke, B. (2014). Psychologia społeczna [ Social psychology]. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.

  • Zhong, C. B., & Liljenquist, K. (2006). Washing away your sins: Threatened morality and physical cleansing. Science, 313, 1451-1452. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Zhong, C. B., Strejcek, B., & Sivanthan, N. (2010). A clean self harsh moral judgment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 859-862. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
OPEN ACCESS

Journal + Issues

Search