A Study of Foreign Language Learning Styles Used by Georgian Students

Open access

A Study of Foreign Language Learning Styles Used by Georgian Students

The aim of the work was to research learning style distribution in Georgian university students to determine which styles or their complexes are optimal in foreign language learning in similar conditions of teaching. Learning style preferences of more and less successful students were compared using a standardized test (Ehrman, 1998). An analysis of frequencies does not reveal reliable differences between more successful and less successful students. A statistically reliable correlation between varieties of styles was detected only in more successful students, giving grounds to conclude that successful students use diverse and multiple styles, while less successful ones are mostly stuck with one style.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Belyaev B.V. (1959). Očerki po psihologii obučeniâś inostrannomu âśzyku (Essay of psychology in teaching a foreign language). Moskva: Prosveŝenie.

  • Chang C-Y. Liu S.C. & Lee Y.N. (2007). A study of language learning strategies used by college EF L Learners in Taiwan. Retrieved 3.10.2007 from: http://www.mdu.edu.tw/~ged/other%20download/bulletin/20070319/11.pdf

  • Cronbach L.J. (1967). How can instruction be adopted to individual differences? In R.M Gagné (Ed.) Learning and individual differences (pp. 232-240). Columbus OH: Merrill.

  • Dornyei Z. (2005). The Psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

  • Ehrman M.E. (1998). Field independence field dependence and field sensitivity. In J.M. Reid (Ed.) Understanding learning styles in the second language classroom (pp. 62-70). Upper Saddle River NJ: Prentice-Hall Regents.

  • Ehrman M.E. Leaver B.L. & Oxford R.L. (2003). A brief overview of individual differences in second language learning. System 31 313-330.

  • Gardner R.C. & Lambert W.E. (1972). Attitudes and motivation in second-language learning. Rowley MA: Newbury House.

  • O'Malley J.M. & Chamot A.U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge UK : Cambridge University Press.

  • Oxford R.L. (1990). Styles strategies and aptitude: Connection for language learning. In T.S. Parry & C.W. Stansfield (Eds.) Language aptitude reconsidered (pp. 67-125). Englewood Cliffs NJ: Prentice Hall.

  • Reid J.M. Vicioso M.V.M. Gedeon É. Takàcs K. & Korotkikh Z. (1998). Teachers as perceptual learning styles researchers. In Reid J.M. (Ed.) Understanding learning styles in the second language classroom (pp. 15-25). Upper Saddle River NJ: Prentice-Hall Regents.

  • Rothbart M.K. & Derryberry D. (1981). Development of individual differences in temperament. In M.E. Lamb & A.L. Brown (Eds.) Advances in developmental psychology. Vol. 1 (pp. 37-86). Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.

  • Skehan P. (1989). Individual differences in second-language learning. London: Edward Arnold.

  • Surmanidze L. (2010). Kultura metodologiur perspektivashi (Culture in methodological perspectives in Georgia). Tbilisi: Universal.

  • Thelen H.A. (1954). Dynamics of groups at work. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Journal information
Impact Factor

CiteScore 2018: 0.29

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.118
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.410

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 2378 1806 97
PDF Downloads 1065 745 20