Introduction. The purpose of this article is first to provide a picture of disability sport in general and second to increase knowledge of sport for women with disabilities.
Material and methods. The study method is a qualitative text analysis of organised Swedish disability sport and of media reporting of the Paralympics. The study begins in 1969, the year when the Swedish Sports Organization for the Disabled (SHIF) was formed, and continues until the Summer Paralympics in 2012. The theory is based on three conceptual pairs: integration and inclusion, the medical and social models, and the traditional and progressive models of media coverage.
Results. The results show that SHIF strove principally not for inclusion but for integration. Further, women in SHIF led a hidden existence, except for the period between the end of the 1970s and the beginning of the 1980s, when initiatives were taken to improve their position. In other respects, this was a non-issue. Moreover, the medical model was dominant, and sport was viewed above all as rehabilitating. Finally, mainstream media reporting was traditional, namely Paralympic participants were portrayed first and foremost as people with disabilities and secondarily as sports practitioners.
Conclusion. Swedish disability sport during this period was not included in the sports movement in general and integration work was, for the SHIF board, superordinate to the gender aspect.
If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.
1. DePauw K. Gavron S. (2005). Disability sport. Second Edition. Champaign IL: Human Kinetics.
2. Bailey S. (2008). Athlete first: A history of the Paralympic Movement. London: Wiley and Sons.
3. DePauw K. (1986). Horseback riding for individuals with disabilities: Programs philosophy and research. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly 3 217-226.
4. De Pauw K. (2001). The Paralympic Movement: Past present and future. ICHPER-SD Journal 2 42-47.
5. Carlsson B. Lindfelt M. (2010). Legal and moral pluralism: Normative tensions in a Nordic sports model in transition. Sport in Society: Cultures Commerce Media Politics 13 718-733.
6. The Swedish National Archives. SHIF archive A1:1 minutes federation meeting 17-18 May 1969. [in Swedish]
7. Buysse J.A. Borcherding B. (2010). Framing gender and disability: A cross-cultural analysis of photographs from the 2008 Paralympic Games. International Journal of Sport Communications 3 308-321.
8. Anderson D. (2009). Adolescent girls’ involvement in disability sport: Implications for identity development. Journal of Sport & Social Issues 33 427-449.
9. Garland Thomson R. (2004). Integrating disability transforming feminist theory. In B.G. Smith B. Hutchison (eds) Gendering disability (pp. 73-103). London: Rutgers University Press.
10. Zitzelsberger H. (2010). (In)visibility: Accounts of embodiment of women with physical disabilities and differences. Disability and Society 20 389-403.
11. Pappous A. Marcellini A. de Léséleuc E. (2011). Contested issues in research on the media coverage of female Paralympics athletes. Sport in Society 14 1182-1191.
12. Todd L. (2007). Partnership for inclusive education: A critical approach to collaborative working. London: Routledge-Falmer.
13. United Nations. (2006). Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD). Retrieved June 27 2017 from https://www.un.org/development/desa/disabilities/convention-on-the-rights-of-persons-with-disabilities.html.
14. Barnes C. Mercer G. Shakespeare T. (1999). Exploring disability: A sociological introduction. Cambridge: Polity Press.
15. Huang C-J. Brittain I. (2006). Negotiating identities through disability sport. Sociology of Sport Journal 23 352-375.
16. Fitzgerald H. (2005). Still feeling like a spare piece of luggage? Embodied experiences of (dis)ability in physical education and school sport. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy 10 41-59.
17. The Swedish Government. Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Retrieved June 15 2017 from http://manskligarattigheter.dynamaster.se/en/human-rights/what-rights-are-there/rights-of-persons-with-disabilities. http://www.manskligarattigheter.se/.
18. Paterson K. Hughes B. (2000). Disabled bodies. In P. Hancock B. Hughes E. Jagger K. Paterson R. Russel E. Tulle-Winton et al. (eds) The body culture and society (pp. 28-44). Buckingham: Open University Press.
19. Corrigan T. Paton J. Holt E. Hardin M. (2010). Discourse of the “Too Abled”: Contested body hierarchies and the Oscar Pistorius case. International Journal of Sport Communication 3 288-307.
20. Hardin B. Hardin M. (2003). Conformity and conflict: Wheelchair athletes discuss sport media. Adapted Physical Education Quarterly 20 246-259.
21. Shapiro J. (1994). No pity: People with disabilities forging a New Civil Rights Movement. New York: Three River Press.
22. Denzin N. Lincoln Y. (2008). Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks CA: Sage Publications.
23. Markula P. (2009). Introduction. In P. Markula (ed.) Olympic women and the media: International perspectives (pp. 1-29). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
24. Cotter C. (2001). Discourse and media. In D. Schiffrin D. Tannen H. Hamilton (eds) The handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 416-436). Oxford: Blackwell.
25. The Swedish National Archives. SHIF archive A1:1 minutes federation meeting 16-17 October 1971. [in Swedish]
26. Handikappidrott no. 4 1975. [in Swedish]
27. The Swedish National Archives. SHIF archive A1:1 minutes federation meetings for 1969. [in Swedish]
28. The Solna Games. (1974). Handikappidrott no. 9. [in Swedish]
29. What is sports for all? (1979). Handikappidrott no. 7. [in Swedish]
30. Consultation about integration. (1992). Handikappidrott no. 4. [in Swedish]
31. Handikappidrott no. 2 1976. [in Swedish]
32. Sports – National movement gaining ground. (1978). Handikappidrott no. 1. [in Swedish]