Barriers to Participation in Tourism in the Disabled

Open access


Introduction. Physical activity is critical to effective rehabilitation in people with disabilities and, consequently, is of high importance in their lives. However, participation of the disabled in physical activity, including tourism, is a much more complex issue than in the case in able-bodied individuals. Material and methods. This paper aims to fill the gap and familiarise the reader with barriers faced by the disabled who engage in tourism. The study group consisted of randomly selected 460 participants with certificates specifying the degree of their disability. The group included 55 (12%) individuals with visual impairments, 203 (44.1%) individuals with hearing impairments, and 202 (43.9%) individuals with locomotor system disabilities. Results. The data derived from interviews made with people with physical dysfunctions, designed with a view to achieving the aims of the study, were used to develop logistic regression models. Conclusions. On average, the greatest and smallest numbers of barriers were reported by individuals with severe disabilities and those who had large families, respectively. Younger disabled people most often complained about the equipment barriers to participation in tourism. Older respondents were mostly challenged with social barriers. Of all the determinants analysed in the study, the perception of barriers to participation in tourism most often depended on the subjects’ degree of disability.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • 1. Kwai-Sang You M. McKercher B. Packer T.L. (2004). Traveling with a disability. More than an access issue. Annals of Tourism Research 31(4) 946-960.

  • 2. Smith R.W. (1987). Leisure of disabled tourist. Barriers to participation. Annals of Tourism Research 14(3) 376-389.

  • 3. Kaganek K. (2009). Tourism of the disabled in light of selected determinants. Kraków: EAS. [in Polish]

  • 4. Shaw G. Coles T. (2004). Disability holiday making and the tourism industry in the UK: A preliminary survey. Tourism Management 25 397-403.

  • 5. Devine M.A. (2004). Being a doer instead of a viewer: The role of inclusive leisure contexts in determining social acceptance for people with disabilities. Journal of Leisure Research 36(2) 137-159.

  • 6. McKercher B. Packer T. Yua M.K. Lam P. (2003). Travel agents as facilitators or inhibitors of travel: Perceptions of people with disabilities. Tourism Management 24(4) 465-474.

  • 7. Cavitano J.L. Cuckovich M.L. (1992). Transportation and tourism for the disabled: An assessment. Transportation Journal 31(3) 46-53.

  • 8. Przecławski K. (1995). Tourism and its role vs. people with special needs. In J. Ślężyński W. Petryński (eds.) Progress in tourism for the benefit of people with special needs (p. 34). Kraków: Polish Association of Disabled People. [in Polish]

  • 9. Buhalis D. Eichhron V. Michopoulou E. Miller G. (2005). Accessibility market and stakeholder analysis. United Kingdom: One-Stop-Shop for Accessible Tourism in Europe (OSSATE) University of Surrey. 10. Jones S. (2004). Disabled faced by travel “barriers”. Travel Weekly: The Choice of Travel Professionals 2/9/2004 1704 26.

Journal information
Impact Factor

Index Copernicus: ICV 2016 = 100.00
Ministry of Science and Higher Education: 14 points

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 393 242 9
PDF Downloads 226 140 4