Introduction. In recent years, a decline in the level of physical activity has been observed all over the world. The number of professions where work is performed in a sitting position has increased. This has had many consequences for our health, the society, and the economy. The aim of this work was to determine which forms of physical activity are the most popular in administrative and office workers, depending on the motives which encourage them to be active. Material and methods. In 2014, a diagnostic survey was carried out among 937 persons in administrative and office positions using a questionnaire form designed by the authors. The study involved persons aged 18 to 65 years, and most of the respondents were female (n = 669). A qualitative analysis of the data was carried out using logistic regression, and the findings were considered statistically significant at p < 0.05. Results. Changing the shape of one’s body was found to be the main determinant of using the gym among the respondents. Persons who jogged regularly, on the other hand, did so in order to increase physical fitness, and those who practised Nordic walking were motivated by the need to care for their health. As far as swimming is concerned, persons who had friends that engaged in this form of activity undertook it almost ten times more often than those who did not have such support from their family and friends (OR = 9.58). Respondents who desired to meet new people were over five times more likely to choose team games as an active form of spending their leisure time (OR = 5.21) than other respondents. Finally, those who engaged in physical activity in order to strengthen family bonds preferred playing and playing games with children in the open air. Conclusions. The predominant forms of physical activity which were regularly performed by the respondents were walking, cycling, and doing gymnastic exercise at home. The respondents were mainly motivated to pursue these activities due to their desire to relieve tension and stress, care for their health, and lose weight or maintain a healthy weight.
1. Griffiths K., Mackey M., Adamson B., Pepper K. (2012). Prevalence and risk factors for musculoskeletal symptoms with computer based work across occupations. Work 42(4), 533-541. DOI: 10.3233/WOR-2012-1396.
2. Church T., Thomas D., Tudor-Locke C., Katzmarzyk P., Earnest C., Rodarte R. et al. (2011). Trends over 5 decades in US occupation-related physical activity and their associations with obesity. PloS One 6(5), e19657. DOI: 10.1371/journal. pone.0019657.
3. Uffelen J., Wong J., Chau J., Ploeg H., Riphagen I., Gilson N. et al. (2010). Occupational sitting and health risks: a systematic review. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 39(4), 379-88. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.05.024.
4. Chodinow W. (2008). Role of active rest in circuit training. Collection of Research Papers from the Eastern European National University in Lutsk. Lutsk, 360-363. [in Polish]
5. Sygit K. (2015). Fundamental significance of physical activity for seniors’ health. Central European Journal of Sport Sciences and Medicine 12(4), 53-59.
6. European Commission. (2014). Sport and physical activity. Special Eurobarometer 412. Brussels: European Commission. DOI: 10.2766/73002.
7. Kowalczyk A., Kozłowska E. (2015). Motives and limitations of physical activity in the professional group of office workers. Journal of Education, Health and Sport 5(9), 413-428.
8. Kozłowska E., Kowalczyk A., Rząca M., Kocka K. (2015). The impact of selected sociodemographic factors on motor activity of the office workers. Journal of Education, Health and Sport 5(6), 141-156.
9. Biernat E., Stupnicki R. (2005). Review of international questionnaires used in research into physical activity. Wychowanie Fizyczne i Sport 49, 32-42. [in Polish]
10. Kwasiborski P., Sobol M. (2011). Chi-square independence test and its application in the interpretation of clinical trial results. Kardiochirurgia i Torakochirurgia 4, 550-554. [in Polish]
11. Markowicz I., Stolarz B. (2009). Effect of encoding variables on the interpretation of the parameters of logistic regression models. Prace i Materiały Wydziału Zarządzania Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego 4(2), 621-630. [in Polish]
12. Public Opinion Research Center (CBOS). (2013). Communication on Research BS/129/2013. Physical activity of Poles. Warszawa: CBOS. [in Polish]
13. Olszewski-Strzyżowski J., Dróżdż R. (2014). Motivation for undertaking physical activity among residents of Elbląg. Rozprawy Naukowe Akademii Wychowania Fizycznego we Wrocławiu 47, 124-130. [in Polish]
14. Latosik E., Planeta K., Stachura A. (2011). Move, because… you will rust up - motives and obstacles for undertaking physical activity in librarians from Katowice. Bibliotheca Nostra 1(23), 18-19. [in Polish]
15. Polish Council of Ministers. (2015). Draft resolution of the Polish Council of Ministers on establishing the “National Health Programme for the years 2016-2020”. Retrieved October 3, 2015 from http://legislacja.rcl.gov.pl/docs//2/12270850/12281779/12281780/dokument164277.pdf. [in Polish]
16. Królikowska B. (2014). Health benefits of gymnastics in persons aged 50 +. In A. Kostecka, H. Żukowska, M. Szark- Eckardt, R. Muszkieta, E. Bendikova (eds), Education, physical activity, and health (pp. 147-158). Bydgoszcz: Polska: Oficyna Wydawnicza Mirosław Wrocławski. [in Polish]
17. Bazuń D. (2013). Why bother? Motivating factors for performing physical activity in fitness clubs - research findings. Rocznik Lubuski 39(1), 197-211. [in Polish]
18. Siedlikowska M. (2012). Nordic walking in the opinion of participants of organised exercise. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego 771, 187-196. [in Polish]
19. Kapoor S. (2013). Nordic walking and its clinical benefits in different disorders. Disability and Rehabilitation 35(19), 1676.
20. Jopkiewicz A., Gawron J. (2015). An assessment of the physical activity of adults residing in the Świętokrzyskie Region. Polish Journal Sport and Tourism 22, 84-93.
21. Polish Ministry of Sport and Tourism. (2015). Study of the motivation for undertaking physical activity in elderly people. Report on the implementation of the project. Warszawa: GfK Polonia Sp. z o.o. [in Polish]