Direct monitoring of erythrocytes aggregation under the effect of the low-intensity magnetic field by measuring light transmission at wavelength 800 nm

Open access


Interacting electromagnetic field with the living organisms and cells became of the great interest in the last decade. Erythrocytes are the most common types of the blood cells and have unique rheological, electrical, and magnetic properties. Aggregation is one of the important characteristics of the erythrocytes which has a great impact in some clinical cases. The present study introduces a simple method to monitor the effect of static magnetic field on erythrocytes aggregation using light transmission. Features were extracted from the time course curve of the light transmission through the whole blood under different intensities of the magnetic field. The findings of this research showed that static magnetic field could influence the size and the rate of erythrocytes aggregation. The strong correlations confirmed these results between the static magnetic field intensity and both the time of aggregation and sedimentation of erythrocytes. From this study, it can be concluded that static magnetic field can be used to modify the mechanisms of erythrocytes aggregation.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • [1] Baskurt OK Hardeman MR Rampling MW Meiselman HJ (eds.). Handbook of hemorheology and hemodynamics. Biomedical and Health Research Vol. 69. 2007: IOS press.

  • [2] Rampling MW. Red cell aggregation and yield stress. In: Lowe GDO (ed.) Clinical blood rheology. Vol I. Boca Raton: CRC Press 1988:45-64.

  • [3] Ami RB Barshtein G Zeltser D et al. Parameters of red blood cell aggregation as correlates of the inflammatory state. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2001;280(5):H1982-H1988.

  • [4] Chien S Sung LA. Physicochemical basis and clinical implications of red cell aggregation. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 1987;7(1): 71-91.

  • [5] Cho YI Mooney MP Cho DJ. Hemorheological Disorders in Diabetes Mellitus. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2008;2(6):1130-1138.

  • [6] Yu FTH Armstrong JK Tripette J et al. A local increase in red blood cell aggregation can trigger deep vein thrombosis: evidence based on quantitative cellular ultrasound imaging. J Thromb Haemost. 2011;9(3): 481-488.

  • [7] Baskurt OK Uyuklu M Ozdem S Meiselman HJ. Measurement of red blood cell aggregation in disposable capillary tubes. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2011;47(4):295-305.

  • [8] Volpe P. Interactions of zero-frequency and oscillating magnetic fields with biostructures and biosystems. Photochem Photobiol Sci. 2003;2(6): 637-648.

  • [9] McKay JC Prato FS Thomas AW. A literature review: the effects of magnetic field exposure on blood flow and blood vessels in the microvasculature. Bioelectromagnetics. 2007;28(2): 81-98.

  • [10] Ohkubo C Okano H Ushiyama A Masuda H. EMF effects on microcirculatory system. Environmentalist. 2007;27(4): 395-402.

  • [11] Wang Z Yang P Xu H et al. Inhibitory effects of a gradient static magnetic field on normal angiogenesis. Bioelectromagnetics. 2009;30(6): 446-453.

  • [12] Bassett CA. Fundamental and practical aspects of therapeutic uses of pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMFs). Crit Rev Biomed Eng. 1989;17(5): 451-529.

  • [13] Rubik B. The biofield hypothesis: Its biophysical basis and role in medicine. J Altern Complement Med. 2002;8(6):703-717.

  • [14] Shupak NM Prato FS Thomas AW. Therapeutic uses of pulsed magnetic-field exposure: a review. Radio Sci Bull. 2003;76(4): 9-32.

  • [15] Eccles NK. A critical review of randomized controlled trials of static magnets for pain relief. J Altern Complement Med. 2005;11(3): 495-509.

  • [16] Carpenter LL. Neurostimulation in resistant depression. Journal of Psychopharmacology. 2006;20(3_suppl):35-40.

  • [17] Mayrovitz HN Groseclose EE. Effects of a static magnetic field of either polarity on skin microcirculation. Microvasc res. 2005;69(1): 24-27.

  • [18] Haarala C AAlto S Hautzel H et al. Effects of a 902 MHz mobile phone on cerebral blood flow in humans: a PET study. Neuroreport. 2003;14(16):2019-2023.

  • [19] Tao R Huang K. Reducing blood viscosity with magnetic fields. Physical Review E. 2011;84(1): 011905.

  • [20] Kowal P Marcinkowska-Gapinska A. Analysis of the influence of magnetostimulation on the hemorheological parameters and on the result of thermographic examination. Pol J Environmental Studies Monographs. 2010;1:59-64.

  • [21] Baskurt OK Uyuklu M Hardeman MR Meiselman HJ. Photometric measurements of red blood cell aggregation: light transmission versus light reflectance. J Biomed Opt. 2009;14(5): 054044-054044-6.

  • [22] Hardeman MR Dobbe JG Ince C. The Laser-assisted Optical Rotational Cell Analyzer (LORCA) as red blood cell aggregometer. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2001;25(1): 1-11.

  • [23] Uyuklu M Canpolat M Meiselman HJ Baskurt OK. Wavelength selection in measuring red blood cell aggregation based on light transmittance. J Biomed Opt. 2011;16(11):117006-1170069.

  • [24] Haik Y Pai V Chen C-J. Apparent viscosity of human blood in a high static magnetic field. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials. 2001;225(1-2):180-186.

  • [25] Xu S H Okano Ohkubo C. Acute effects of whole-body exposure to static magnetic fields and 50-Hz electromagnetic fields on muscle microcirculation in anesthetized mice. Bioelectrochemistry. 2001;53(1): 127-135.

  • [26] Gmitrov J. Static magnetic field and verapamil effect on baroreflex stimulus-induced microcirculatory responses. Electromagnetic Bol Med. 2004;23(2):141-155.

  • [27] Gmitrov J. Geomagnetic disturbance worsen microcirculation impairing arterial baroreflex vascular regulatory mechanism. Electromagnetic Biol Med. 2005;24(1):31-37.

  • [28] Gmitrov J Ohkubo C Okano H. Effect of 0.25 T static magnetic field on microcirculation in rabbits. Bioelectromagnetics. 2002;23(3):224-229.

  • [29] Tanimoto Y Kakuda Y. Influence of strong magnetic field on the sedimentation of red blood cells. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2009; 156(1):012030.

Journal information
Impact Factor

CiteScore 2018: 0.38

ICV 2017 = 103.49

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.132
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.303

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 234 125 3
PDF Downloads 128 78 0