Remediating Joyce’s Techno-Poetics: Mark Amerika, Kenneth Goldsmith, Mark Z. Danielewski

Open access

Abstract

This paper attempts to evaluate the legacy of James Joyce’s avant-gardism for the literary experimentation of Mark Amerika, Kenneth Goldsmith, and Mark Z. Danielewski, three contemporary American writers and artists, working a hundred years after the first of Joyce’s crucial four “shocks of the new” shook the foundations of fiction. In doing so, the paper attempts to bridge the divide between the historical avant-garde and the neo-avant-garde as defined by Renato Poggioli and Peter Bürger, and regarded disparagingly by critics like Robert Hughes. Positing a threefold legacy of Joyce’s “revolution of the word” in its treatment of writing as trace, forgery, and idiom, the paper discusses Amerika’s Grammatron, Goldsmith’s uncreative writing, and Danielewski’s House of Leaves as continuing in and expanding on the achievements of Ulysses and Finnegans Wake. This they achieve by pursuing what Marjorie Perloff has termed “differential poetics” and N. Katherine Hayles has rethought as “Assemblage” – two poetic strategies dominant at the beginning of the 21st century.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Amerika Mark. Grammatron. January 1997. Web. Accessed 15 March 2019. http://www.grammatron.com/about.html

  • Amerika Mark and Ron Sukenick (eds). Degenerative Prose. Champaign: FC2 Press Illinois University Press 1995. Print.

  • Amerika Mark and Ron Sukenick (eds). Meta/Data – A Digital Poetics. Cambridge Mass: MIT Press 2007. Print.

  • Amerika Mark and Ron Sukenick (eds). Remixthebook. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press 2011. Print.

  • Bürger Peter. Theory of the Avant-Garde. Trans. Michael Shaw. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press 1984. Print.

  • Danielewski Mark Z. House of Leaves. New York: Pantheon Books 2000. Print.

  • Danielewski Mark Z and Sophie Cottrell (eds). “Bold Type: Conversation with Mark Danielewski” April 2002. Web. Accessed 15 March 2019. www.randomhouse.com/boldtype/0400/danielewski/interview.html

  • Goldsmith Kenneth. Fidget. New York: Coach House Books 2000. Print.

  • Goldsmith Kenneth. Head Citations. Great Barrington: The Figures 2002. Print.

  • Goldsmith Kenneth. Uncreative Writing: Managing Language in the Digital Age. New York: Columbia University Press 2011. Print.

  • Hayles N. Katherine. “Translating Media: Why We Should Rethink Textuality.” The Yale Journal of Criticism vol. 16 no. 2. 2003: 263-290. Print.

  • Hughes Robert. The Shock of the New. New York: Alfred Knopf 1991. Print.

  • Jolas Eugene. “The Revolution of Language and James Joyce.” Our Exagmination Round His Factification for Incamination of Work in Progress: A Symposium. Ed. Samuel Beckett. New York: New Directions 1929. 77–93. Print.

  • Jolas Eugene. (ed). Transition Workshop. New York: The Vanguard Press 1949. Print. Joyce James. Finnegans Wake. London: Faber and Faber 1939. Print.

  • Jolas Eugene. Ulysses. New York: Random House 1922 (1986). Print.

  • McHugh Roland. Annotations to Finnegans Wake (4th edition). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press 2016. Print.

  • Perloff Marjorie. “‘Vocable Scriptsigns’: Differential Poetics in Kenneth Goldsmith’s Fidget.” Kenneth Goldsmith. Fidget. New York: Coach House Books 2000. 90–102. Print.

  • Poggioli Renato. The Theory of the Avant-Garde. Cambridge Mass: Harvard University Press 1968. Print.

  • Pressman Jessica. “House of Leaves: Reading the Networked Novel.” Studies in American Fiction vol. 34 no. 1 2006: 107–28. Print.

  • Theall Donald. “Beyond the Orality/Literacy Dichotomy: James Joyce & the Pre-History of Cyberspace.” Eds. David Vichnar and Louis Armand. Hypermedia Joyce. Prague: Litteraria Pragensia Books 2010. 17–35. Print.

Search
Journal information
Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 43 43 11
PDF Downloads 29 29 6