Remediating Joyce’s Techno-Poetics: Mark Amerika, Kenneth Goldsmith, Mark Z. Danielewski

David Vichnar 1
  • 1 Charles University, , Prague

Abstract

This paper attempts to evaluate the legacy of James Joyce’s avant-gardism for the literary experimentation of Mark Amerika, Kenneth Goldsmith, and Mark Z. Danielewski, three contemporary American writers and artists, working a hundred years after the first of Joyce’s crucial four “shocks of the new” shook the foundations of fiction. In doing so, the paper attempts to bridge the divide between the historical avant-garde and the neo-avant-garde as defined by Renato Poggioli and Peter Bürger, and regarded disparagingly by critics like Robert Hughes. Positing a threefold legacy of Joyce’s “revolution of the word” in its treatment of writing as trace, forgery, and idiom, the paper discusses Amerika’s Grammatron, Goldsmith’s uncreative writing, and Danielewski’s House of Leaves as continuing in and expanding on the achievements of Ulysses and Finnegans Wake. This they achieve by pursuing what Marjorie Perloff has termed “differential poetics” and N. Katherine Hayles has rethought as “Assemblage” – two poetic strategies dominant at the beginning of the 21st century.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Amerika, Mark. Grammatron. January 1997. Web. Accessed 15 March 2019. http://www.grammatron.com/about.html

  • Amerika, Mark and Ron Sukenick (eds). Degenerative Prose. Champaign: FC2 Press, Illinois University Press, 1995. Print.

  • Amerika, Mark and Ron Sukenick (eds). Meta/Data – A Digital Poetics. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 2007. Print.

  • Amerika, Mark and Ron Sukenick (eds). Remixthebook. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2011. Print.

  • Bürger, Peter. Theory of the Avant-Garde. Trans. Michael Shaw. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1984. Print.

  • Danielewski, Mark Z. House of Leaves. New York: Pantheon Books, 2000. Print.

  • Danielewski, Mark Z, and Sophie Cottrell (eds). “Bold Type: Conversation with Mark Danielewski,” April 2002. Web. Accessed 15 March 2019. www.randomhouse.com/boldtype/0400/danielewski/interview.html

  • Goldsmith, Kenneth. Fidget. New York: Coach House Books, 2000. Print.

  • Goldsmith, Kenneth. Head Citations. Great Barrington: The Figures, 2002. Print.

  • Goldsmith, Kenneth. Uncreative Writing: Managing Language in the Digital Age. New York: Columbia University Press, 2011. Print.

  • Hayles, N. Katherine. “Translating Media: Why We Should Rethink Textuality.” The Yale Journal of Criticism, vol. 16, no. 2. 2003: 263-290. Print.

  • Hughes, Robert. The Shock of the New. New York: Alfred Knopf, 1991. Print.

  • Jolas, Eugene. “The Revolution of Language and James Joyce.” Our Exagmination Round His Factification for Incamination of Work in Progress: A Symposium. Ed. Samuel Beckett. New York: New Directions, 1929. 77–93. Print.

  • Jolas, Eugene. (ed). Transition Workshop. New York: The Vanguard Press, 1949. Print. Joyce, James. Finnegans Wake. London: Faber and Faber, 1939. Print.

  • Jolas, Eugene. Ulysses. New York: Random House, 1922 (1986). Print.

  • McHugh, Roland. Annotations to Finnegans Wake (4th edition). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2016. Print.

  • Perloff, Marjorie. “‘Vocable Scriptsigns’: Differential Poetics in Kenneth Goldsmith’s Fidget.” Kenneth Goldsmith. Fidget. New York: Coach House Books, 2000. 90–102. Print.

  • Poggioli, Renato. The Theory of the Avant-Garde. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1968. Print.

  • Pressman, Jessica. “House of Leaves: Reading the Networked Novel.” Studies in American Fiction, vol. 34, no. 1, 2006: 107–28. Print.

  • Theall, Donald. “Beyond the Orality/Literacy Dichotomy: James Joyce & the Pre-History of Cyberspace.” Eds. David Vichnar and Louis Armand. Hypermedia Joyce. Prague: Litteraria Pragensia Books, 2010. 17–35. Print.

OPEN ACCESS

Journal + Issues

Search