Relationships between bees (Hymenoptera: Apoidea: Apiformes) and flowers in the Bulgarian agricultural landscape

Open access

Abstract

The species composition and number of visitations of food plants by bees were studied in refuge sites in agricultural landscapes and in selected crops. The habitat fragments of interest are characterised in terms of pollinator diversity at genus level and the use of food plants by individual genera. Trophic and temporal niche overlap is described for individual genera and the honey bee Apis mellifera in different habitat types. Factors influencing the manner of use of individual plant species by pollinating insects are identified

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • AGUIAR C.M.L. SANTOS G.M. de M. 2007. Floral Resource Partitioning by Social Wasps (Hymenoptera: Vespidae) and Bees (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) in an Area of Caatinga in Brazil. Neotropical Entomology 36(6): 836-842. (in Portuguese) AGUIAR C.M.L. SANTOS G.M. de M. MARTINS C.F. PRESLEY S.J. 2013. Trophic niche breadth and niche overlap in a guild of flower-visiting bees in a Brazilian dry forest. Apidologie 44(2): 153-162.

  • ATANASSOV N. 1960. Untersuchungen über die Arten aus der Familie Halictidae (Hymenoptera) in Bulgariens und der Balkanhalbinsel. Izvestiya na Zoologicheskiya institut s muzei 9: 315-338.

  • ATANASSOV N. 1962a. Untersuchungen über die Arten von der Gattung Xylocopa LATR. (Hymenoptera Apoidea) in Bulgarien und auf der Balkanhalbinsel. Izvestiia na Zoologicheskiya Institut s Muzei 11: 167-180.

  • ATANASSOV N. 1962b. Untersuchungen über die systematik und die Ökologie der Hymenopterenarten aus dem Gebiet von Petrič (Südwestbulgarien). Izvestiia na Zoologicheskiya Institut s Muzei 12: 109-172.

  • ATANASSOV N. 1965. Hymenoptera von der Insel Thasos. Izvestiia na Zoologicheskiya Institut s Muzei 19: 85-99.

  • ATANASSOV N. 1972a. Hymenopteraarten im Westlichen “Stara Planina“ - Gebirge. I. Izvestiia na Zoologicheskiya Institut s Muzei 35: 179-228.

  • ATANASSOV N. 1972b. Hymenopteraarten im Westlichen „Stara Planina“ - Gebirge. II. Izvestiia na Zoologicheskiya Institut s Muzei 36: 23-59.

  • ATANASSOV N. 1974. Hummeln und Schmarotzerhummeln (Bombus LATR. Psithyrus LEP. Hym.) von dem Mittleren und dem Östlichen Balkangebirge. Izvestiia na Zoologicheskiya Institut s Muzei 41: 107-121.

  • ATANASSOV N. VASSILEVA E. 1981. Bees - pollinators (Hymenoptera Apoidea) of alfalfa in the region of Pleven. III. Seasonal dynamics of the species. Plant Science 18(3): 102-109.

  • BANASZAK J. 1980. Studies on methods of censusing the numbers of bees (Hymenoptera Apoidea). Polish Ecological Studies 6(2): 355-366.

  • BANASZAK J. 1983. Ecology of bees (Apoidea) of agricultural landscape. Polish Ecological Studies 9(4): 421-505.

  • BANASZAK J. DOCHKOVA B. 2014. Bees (Hymenoptera Apoidea Apiformes) in the agricultural lanscape of Bulgaria: species diversity. Journal of Apicultural Science 58(1): 29-49.

  • BLÜTHGEN N. KLEIN A.-M. 2011. Functional complementarity and specialisation: The role of biodiversity in plant-pollinator interactions. Basic and Applied Ecology 12(4): 282-291.

  • BOMMARCO R. BIESMEIJER J.C. MEYER B. POTTS S.G. PÖYRY J. ROBERTS S.P.M. STEFFANDEWENTER I. ÖCKINGER E. 2010. Dispersal capacity and diet breadth modify the response of wild bees to habitat loss. Proceeding of the Royal Society of London B 277: 2075-2082.

  • BOULINIER T. NICHOLS J.D. SAUER J.R. HINES J.E. POLLOCK K.H. 1998. Estimating species richness: the importance of heterogeneity in species detectability. Ecology 79(3): 1018-1028.

  • CASTRO-ARELLANO I. LACHER T.E. Jr. WILLIG M.R. RANGEL T.F. 2010. Assessment of assemblagewide temporal-niche segregation using null models. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 1(3): 311-318.

  • DIMITROV P. 1990. Effect of the density of the wild bees (Hymenoptera Apoidea) on the percentage of pollination of lucerne blossoms. Plant Science 27(6): 23-27.

  • DIMITROV P. DIMITROVA Z. 1991a. Studies of the provision of alfalfa fields for seed production with pollinating bees (Hymenoptera Apoidea) in conditions of north-eastern Bulgaria. Agricultural Science 29(4-6): 90-93.

  • DIMITROV P. DIMITROVA Z. 1991b. A rapid method of determining the density of wild bees (HYMENOPTERA Apoidea) in lucerne grown for seed. Plant Science 28(3-6): 118-119.

  • DOCHKOVA B. 1981a. Alfalfa Megachile rotundata F. (= pacifica PZ.) (Hymenoptera Megachilidae). I. Morphological and biological characteristics. Plant Science 18(8): 91-98.

  • DOCHKOVA B. 1981b. Bees-pollinators (Hymenoptera Apoidea) of alfalfa in the region of Pleven. V. Economic importance. Plant Science 18(5): 148-155.

  • DOCHKOVA B. 1982a. Alfalfa leaf-cutting bee Megachile rotundata F. (= pacifica PZ.) (Hymenoptera Megachilidae). II. Building and pollination activity. Plant Science 19(1): 112-118. DOCHKOVA B. 1982b. The alfalfa leaf cutter-bee (Megachile rotundata F.) (= pacifica PZ.) (Hymenoptera Megachilidae). III. Natural pests and possibilities for their control. Plant Science 19(2): 118-127.

  • DUFRÊNE M. LEGENDRE P. 1997. Species assemblages and indicator species: the need for a flexible asymmetrical approach. Ecological Monographs 67(3): 345-366.

  • FEINSINGER P. SPEARS E.E. POOLE R.W. 1981. A simple measure of niche breadth. Ecology 62(1): 27-32.

  • FRANZÉN M. LARSSON M. NILSSON S.G. 2009. Small local population sizes and high habitat patch fidelity in a specialised solitary bee. Journal of Insect Conservation 13(1): 89-95.

  • GARIBALDI L.A. STEFFAN-DEWENTER I. KREMEN C. MORALES J.M. BOMMARCO R. CUNNINGHAM S.A. CARVALHEIRO L.G. CHACOFF N.P. DUDENHÖFFER J.H. GREENLEAF S.S. HOLZSCHUH A. ISAACS R. KREWENKA K. MANDELIK Y. MAYFIELD M.M. MORANDIN L.A. POTTS S.G. RICKETTS T.H. SZENTGYÖRGYI H. VIANA B.F. WESTPHAL C. WINFREE R. KLEIN A.M. 2011. Stability of pollination services decreases with isolation from natural areas despite honey bee visits. Ecology Letters 14(10): 1062-1072.

  • GARIBALDI L.A. STEFFAN-DEWENTER I.WINFREE R.AIZEN M.A. BOMMARCO R. CUNNINGHAM S.A. KREMEN C. CARVALHEIRO L.G. HARDER L.D. AFIK O. BARTOMEUS I. BENJAMIN F. BOREUX V. CARIVEAU D. CHACOFF N.P. DUDENHÖFFER J.H. FREITAS B.M. GHAZOUL J. GREENLEAF S. HIPÓLITO J. HOLZSCHUH A. HOWLETT B. ISAACS R. JAVOREK S.K. KENNEDY C.M. KREWENKA K.M. KRISHNAN S. MANDELIK Y. MAYFIELD M.M. MOTZKE I. MUNYULI T. NAULT B.A. OTIENO M. PETERSEN J. PISANTY G. POTTS S.G. RADER R. RICKETTS T.H. RUNDLÖF M. SEYMOUR C.L. SCHÜEPP C. SZENTGYÖRGYI H. TAKI H. TSCHARNTKE T. VERGARA C.H. VIANA B.F. WANGER T.C. WESTPHAL C. WILLIAMS N. KLEIN A.M. 2013. Wild Pollinators Enhance Fruit Set of Crops Regardless of Honey Bee Abundance. Science 339(6127): 1608-1611.

  • GATHMANN A. TSCHARNTKE T. 2002. Foraging ranges of solitary bees. Journal of Animal Ecology 71(5): 757-764.

  • GOTELLI N.J. ENTSMINGER G.L. 2001. EcoSim: Null models software for ecology. Version 7.0. Acquired Intelligence Inc. & Kesey-Bear. Internet: http://homepages.together.net/~gentsmin/ecosim.htm

  • GOTELLI N.J. GRAVES G.R. 1996. Null Models in Ecology. Smithsonian Institution Press Washington DC.

  • HOLZSCHUH A. DORMANN C.F. TSCHARNTKE T. STEFFAN-DEWENTER I. 2011. Expansion of massflowering crops leads to transient pollinator dilution and reduced wild plant pollination. Proceeding of the Royal Society of London B 278: 3444-3451.

  • HOLZSCHUH A. DUDENHÖFFER J.-H. TSCHARNTKE T. 2012. Landscapes with wild bee habitats enhance pollination fruit set and yield of sweet cherry. Biological Conservation 153(): 101-107.

  • KENNEDY C.M. LONSDORF E. NEEL M.C. WILLIAMS N.M. RICKETTS T.H. WINFREE R. BOMMARCO R. BRITTAIN C. BURLEY A.L. CARIVEAU D. CARVALHEIRO L.G. CHACOFF N.P. CUNNINGHAM S.A. DANFORTH B.N. DUDENHÖFFER J.-H. ELLE E. GAINES H.R. GARIBALDI L.A. GRATTON C. HOLZSCHUH A. ISAACS R. JAVOREK S.K. JHA S. KLEIN A.M. KREWENKA K. MANDELIK Y. MAYFIELD M.M. MORANDIN L. NEAME L.A. OTIENO M. PARK M. POTTS S.G. RUNDLÖF M. SAEZ A. STEFFAN-DEWENTER I. TAKI H. VIANA B.F.WESTPHAL C.WILSON J.K. GREENLEAF S.S. KREMEN C. 2013. A global quantitative synthesis of local and landscape effects on wild bee pollinators in agroecosystems. Ecological Letters 16(5): 584-599. KLEIN A.-M. BRITTAIN C. HENDRIX S.D. THORP R.WILLIAMS N. KREMEN C. 2012. Wild pollination services to California almond rely on semi-natural habitat. Journal of Applied Ecology 49(3): 723-732.

  • LAWLOR L.R. 1980. Structure and stability in natural and randomly constructed competitive communities. American Naturalist 116(3): 394-408.

  • LE FÉON V. BUREL F. CHIFFLET R. HENRY M. RICROCH A. VAISSIÈRE B.E. BAUDRY J. 2013. Solitary bee abundance and species richness in dynamic agricultural landscapes. [in:] F. BUREL C. LAVIGNE A.-C. MOONEN A. OUIN S.L. POGGIO (eds.). Landscape ecology and biodiversity in agricultural landscapes. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment 166: 94-101.

  • LENTINI P.E. MARTIN T.G. GIBBONS P. FISCHER J. CUNNINGHAM S.A. 2012. Supporting wild pollinators in a temperate agricultural landscape: Maintaining mosaics of natural features and production. Biological Conservation 149: 84-92.

  • MACQUEEN J.B. 1976. Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations. [in:] L.M. LE CAM J. NEYMAN (eds.). Proceedings of 5th Berkeley Symposium of Mathematical Statistics and Probability Vol. 1. University of California Press Berkeley 281-297.

  • MANDELIK Y.WINFREE R. NEESON T. KREMEN C. 2012. Complementary habitat use by wild bees in agro-natural landscapes. Ecological Applications 22(5): 1535-1546.

  • MARSHALL E.J.P. 2004. Agricultural landscapes: field margin habitats and their interaction with crop production. Journal of Crop Improvement 12(1-2): 365-404.

  • MORANDIN L.A. KREMEN C. 2013. Hedgerow restoration promotes pollinator populations and exports native bees to adjacent fields. Ecological Applications 23(4): 829-839.

  • NPGR [National Plant Genetic Resources] 1995. Bulgaria: Country Report to the International Technical Conference on Plant Genetic Resources (Leipzig 1996). National Plant Genetic Resources Sadovo.

  • RANDS S.A. WHITNEY H.M. 2010. Effects of pollinator density-dependent preferences on field margin visitations in the midst of agricultural monocultures: A modelling approach. Ecological Modelling 221(9): 1310-1316.

  • RANDS S.A. WHITNEY H.M. 2011. Field margins foraging distances and their impacts on nesting pollinator success. Plos One 6(10): e25971.

  • REZENDE E.L. LAVABRE J.E. GUIMARÃES P.R. JORDANO P. BASCOMPTE J. 2007. Non-random coextinctions in phylogenetically structured mutualistic networks. Nature 448(7156): 925-928.

  • ROLLIN O. BRETAGNOLLE V. DECOURTYE A. APTEL J. MICHEL N. VAISSIÈRE B.E. HENRY M. 2013. Differences of floral resource use between honey bees and wild bees in an intensive farming system. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment 179(1): 78-86.

  • SHANNON C.E. 1948. The Mathematical Theory of Communications. [in:] C.E. SHANNON W. WEAVER (eds.). The mathematical theory of communication. University of Illinois Press Urbana 3-91.

  • SIEGEL S. 1956. Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. McGraw-Hill Book Company Inc. New York.

  • TASHEV A. PANCHEVA E. 2009. Systematic structure of the honey bearing plants of the Bulgarian flora. Forestry Ideas 15(1): 114-123 TASHEV A. PANCHEVA E. 2011. Conservation importance of the melliferous plants of the Bulgarian flora. Chornomorskiy Botanical Journal 7(2): 103-112.

  • TUELL J.K. FIEDLER A.K. LANDIS D. ISAACS R. 2008. Visitation by wild and managed bees (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) to eastern U.S. native plants for use in conservation programs. Environmental Entomology 37(3): 707-718.

  • WILLIAMS N.M. KREMEN C. 2007. Resource distributions among habitats determine solitary bee offspring production in a mosaic landscape. Ecological Applications 17(3): 910-921.

  • ZIMMERMAN G.M. GOETZ H.MIELKE JR. P.W. 1985. Use of an improved statistical method for group comparisons to study effects of prairie fire. Ecology 66(2): 606-611.

Search
Journal information
Impact Factor


CiteScore 2018: 0.44

Scimago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.218
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.167

Cited By
Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 228 118 3
PDF Downloads 154 87 1