Galvanic coupling effects for module-mounting elements of ground-mounted photovoltaic power station

Open access


This communication reports on the concerns associated with possible generation of galvanic coupling effects for construction materials that are used to manufacture mounting assemblies for ground-mounted photovoltaic (PV) power stations. For this purpose, six macro-corrosion galvanic cells were assembled, including: hot-dip Zn/Magnelis®-coated steel/Al and stainless steel (SS)/Al cells. Corrosion experiments involved continuous, ca. three-month exposure of these couplings in 3 wt.% NaCl solution, conducted at room temperature for a stable pH value of around 8. All corrosion cells were subjected to regular assessment of galvanic current-density and potential parameters, where special consideration was given to compare the corrosion behaviour of Zn-coated steel samples with that of Magnelis®-coated electrodes. Characterization of surface condition and elemental composition for examined materials was carried-out by means of SEM and EDX spectroscopy techniques.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • 1. Aste N. & Pero C.D. (2010). Technical and economic performance analysis of large-scale ground-mounted PV plants in Italian context. Prog. Photovoltaics 18(5) 371–384. DOI: 10.1002/pip.984.

  • 2. Desideri U. Proietti S. Zepparelli F. Sdringda P. & Bini S. (2012). Life cycle assessment of a ground-mounted 1778 kWp photovoltaic plant and comparison with traditional energy production systems. Appl. Energy 97 930–943. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.01.055.

  • 3. Yang R.J. (2015). Overcoming technical barriers and risks in the application of building integrated photovoltaics (BIPV): hardware and software strategies. Automat. Constr. 51 92–102. DOI: 10.1016/j.autcon.2014.12.005.

  • 4. Fontana M.G. (1987). Corrosion Engineering 3rd ed. McGraw-Hill New York Chapter 3 p. 39.

  • 5. Roberge P.R. (2000). Handbook of Corrosion Engineering McGraw-Hill New York Chapter 5 p. 340.

  • 6. Uhlig H.H. & Revie R.W. (1985). Corrosion and Corrosion Control: An Introduction to Corrosion Science and Engineering 3rd ed. John Wiley & Sons New York Chapter 6 p. 101.

  • 7. Kautek W. (1988). The galvanic corrosion of steel coatings: aluminum in comparison to cadmium and zinc. Corr. Sci. 28(2) 173–199. DOI: 10.1016/0010-938X(88)90094-7.

  • 8. Magnelis® last accessed (07/04/2017).

  • 9. Hamlaoui Y. Pedraza F. & Tifouti L. (2007). Comparative study by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) on the corrosion resistance of industrial and laboratory zinc coatings. Am. J. Appl. Sci. 4(7) 430–438. DOI: 10.3844/ajassp.2007.430.438.

  • 10. Salgueiro Azevedo M. Allely C. Ogle K. & Volovitch P. (2015). Corrosion mechanisms of Zn(Mg Al) coated steel in accelerated tests and natural exposure: 1. The role of electrolyte composition in the nature of corrosion products and relative corrosion rate. Corr. Sci. 90 472–481. DOI: 10.1016/j.corsci.2014.05.014.

  • 11. Hakansson E. Hoffman J. Predecki P. & Kumosa M. (2017). The role of corrosion product deposition in galvanic corrosion of aluminum/carbon systems. Corr. Sci. 114 10–16. DOI: 10.1016/j.corsci.2016.10.011.

  • 12. Sun H. Liu S. & Sun L. (2013). A comparative study on the corrosion of galvanized steel under simulated rust layer solution with and without 3.5 wt.% NaCl. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 8 3494–3509.

  • 13. Diler E. Rouvellou B. Rioual S. Lescop B. Nguyen Vien G. & Thierry D. (2014). Characterization of corrosion products of Zn and Zn–Mg–Al coated steel in a marine atmosphere. Corr. Sci. 87 111–117. DOI: 10.1016/j.corsci.2014.06.017.

  • 14. Hamlaoui Y. Pedraza F. & Tifouti L. (2008). Corrosion monitoring of galvanised coatings through electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. Corr. Sci. 50 1558–1566. DOI: 10.1016/j.corsci.2008.02.010.

  • 15. Liu Y. Li H. & Li Z. (2013). EIS Investigation and Structural Characterization of Different Hot-Dipped Zinc-Based Coatings in 3.5% NaCl Solution. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 8 7753–7767.

Journal information
Impact Factor

IMPACT FACTOR 2018: 0,975
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0,878

CiteScore 2018: 1

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.269
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.46

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 379 245 4
PDF Downloads 165 122 2