Empirical investigation of two designs of incline solar water desalination system

Open access

Empirical investigation of two designs of incline solar water desalination system

This paper presents an experimental investigation of two incline solar water desalination (ISWD) systems. One design uses spray jets for spraying water onto the absorber plate, while the other uses a longitudinal slot for getting the inlet water on the absorber plate. The first ever ISWD system constructed and tested by Aybar et al (2005) used the longitudinal slot with a maximum daily production of 2.995 kg/m2 day. The Aybar et al design produced 3.4 kg/m2-day while the new design produced 6.41 kg/m2-day for wick on absorber plate system day during the hottest months in Famagusta (July-August 2010). Also tested was the influence of porous media (wire mesh), wick on the absorber plate. The effect of number of spray jets used in the system on the daily productivity and efficiency of the systems were also investigated.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Delyannis E. (2003). Historic background of desalination and renewable energies. Solar Energy. 75 357-366. DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2003.08.002.

  • Tiwari G. N. Singh H. N. & Tripathi R. (2003). Present status of solar distillation. Solar Energy. 75 367-373. DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2003.07.005.

  • Murugavel K. K. Chockalingam Kn K. S. K. & Srithar K. (2008). An experimental study on single basin double slope simulation solar still with thin layer of water in the basin. Desalination. 220 687-693. DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2007.01.063.

  • Badran O. O. (2007). Experimental study of the enhancement parameters on a single slope solar still productivity. Desalination. 209 136-143. DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2007.04.022.

  • Al-Hinai H. Al-Nassri M. S. & Jubran B. A. (2002). Parametric investigation of a double-effect solar still in comparison with a single-effect solar still. Desalination. 150 75-83. DOI: 10.1016/S0011-9164(02)00931-1.

  • Al-Karaghouli A. A. & Al-Naser W. E. (2004). Performances of single and double basin solar-stills. Applied Energy. 78 347-354. DOI: 10.1016/S0306-2619(03)00005-9.

  • Al-Karaghouli A. A. & Al-Naser W. E. (2004). (2004). Experimental comparative study of the performances of single and double basin solar-stills. Applied Energy. 77 317-325. DOI: 10.1016/S0306-2619(03)00124-7.

  • Agboola O. P. Atikol U. & Assefi H. (2010). Feasibility of Basin Solar Still in Tehran. Proceeding of 10th International Conference on Clean Energy 15-17 September 2010. Famagusta North Cyprus.

  • Ismail B. I. (2009). Design and performance of a transportable hemispherical solar still. Renewable Energy. 34 145-150. DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2008.03.013.

  • Arjunan T. V. Aybar H. S. & Nedunchezhian N. (2009). Status of Solar desalination in India. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 13 2408-2418. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2009.03.006.

  • Samee M. A. Mirza U. K. Majeed T. & Ahmad N. (2007). Design and performance of a simple single basin solar still. Renewable and Sustainable Reviews. 11 543-549. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2005.03.003.

  • Abu-Hijleh B. A. K. & Rababa'h H. M. (2003). Experimental study of a solar still with sponge cubes in basin. Energ. Convers. Manag. 44(9) 1411-1418. DOI: 10.1016/S0196-8904(02)00162-0.

  • Aybar H. S. Egelioglu F. & Atikol U. (2005). An experimental study on an inclined solar Distillation System. Desalination. 180 285-289. DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2005.01.009.

  • Aybar H. S. (2006). Mathematical modeling of an inclined solar water distillation system. Desalination. 190 63-70. DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2005.07.015.

  • Abdel-Rehim Z. S. & Lasheen A. (2005). Improving the performance of solar desalination systems. Renew. Ener. 30 1955-1971. DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2005.01.008.

  • Al-karaghouli A. A. & Minasian A. N. (1995). A floating-wick type solar still. Renew. Energ. 6 77-79. DOI: 10.1016/0960-1481(94)00047-A.

Search
Journal information
Impact Factor

IMPACT FACTOR 2018: 0.975
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.878

CiteScore 2018: 1

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.269
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.46

Cited By
Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 233 48 1
PDF Downloads 117 47 1