Who is the contemporary artist? Social representation of the artist among visual art students

Open access

Abstract

The paper presents the application of semantic field analysis to the reconstruction of the social representation of the contemporary artist among visual arts students. 124 students from the Faculty of Art of the Pedagogical University of Cracow and the Academy of Fine Arts in Krakow answered an openended question: Who is the artist in our time? The narrative material was used to reconstruct the equivalents, opposites, attributes, associations, activities of the subject and activities on the subject which constitute the semantic field of the concept “contemporary artist”. The conclusions, practical implications and direction for future studies are presented.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Abuhamdeh S. Csikszentmihalyi M. (2004). The Artistic Personality: A Systems Perspective. In: R.J. Sternberg E.L. Grigorenko J.L. Singer (Eds). Creativity: From potential to realization. Washington DC: American Psychological Association 31-42.

  • Augustinos M. (1981). Social Representations and Social Cognition: A Convergence of Different Traditions (Doctoral dissertation). Department of Psychology University of Adelaide North Terrace Adelaide S.A. Retrieved: January 31 2017 from https://digital.library.adelaide.edu.au/dspace/bitstream/2440/19758/8/02whole.pdf

  • Barron F. (1972). Artists in the making. New York: Seminar Press.

  • Barton K. Cattell H. (1972). Personality characteristics of female psychology science and art majors. Psychological Reports 31 807-813.

  • Burch G.St J. Pavelis C. Hemsley D.R. Corr P.J. (2006). Schizotypy and creativity in visual artists. British Journal of Psychology 97(2) 177-190.

  • Borg W.R. (1955). The Effect of Personality and Contact upon a Personality Stereotype. The Journal of Educational Research 49(4) 289-294.

  • Botella M. Zenasni F. Lubart T. (2011). Alexithymia and Affect Intensity of Fine Artists. Psychology of Aesthetic Creativity and the Arts 5(3) 251-257.

  • Cameron J.E. Duffy M. Glenwright B. (2014). Singers take central stage! Personality traits and stereotypes of popular musicians. Psychology of Music 1-13 DOI: 10.1177/0305735614543217.

  • Courtial J.P. Kerneur L. (1996). Les représentations de la recherche dans un domaine de la psychologie de l’éducation. Paper on social representations 5 127-144.

  • Csikszentmihalyi M. Getzels J. W. Kahn S. P. (1984). Talent and achievement (Report). Chicago: Spencer and MacArthur Foundations.

  • Cribb C. Gregory A.H. (1999). Stereotypes and Personalities of Musicians. Journal of Psychology 133(1) 104-114.

  • Dickie G. (1974). Art and the Aesthetic: An Institutional Analysis. Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press.

  • Flick U. (2010). Projektowanie badania jakościowego. [Designing Qualitative Research] Warszawa: PWN.

  • Gołaszewska M. (1986). Kim jest artysta? [Who is an artist?] Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Szkolne i Pedagogiczne.

  • Lipton J.P.(1987). Stereotypes Concerning Musicians Within Symphony Orchestras. Journal of Psychology 121(1) 85 – 93.

  • Maslow A.H. (1950) Self-actualizing People: a Study of Psychological Health. Personality Symposium 1 11-34.

  • Maslow A. H. (1968). Toward a psychology of being (2nd ed.). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.

  • Moscovici S. (1963). Attitudes and opinions. Annual Review of Psychology 14 231–260.

  • Pelt V. Poncelet D. (2012) Analysis of the Semantic Field of Social Representation between Teachers and Parents of the School / Family. Papers on Social Representations 21 9.1-9.31.

  • Popek S. (2003). Człowiek jako jednostka twórcza. [Humans as creative entities] Lublin: Wydawnictwo UMCS.

  • Potocka M.A. (2011). What is art for? MOCAK Forum 2 (2); Retrieved: September 21 2016 from https://en.mocak.pl/what-is-art-for-maria-anna-potocka.

  • Robin R. (1980). Badanie pól semantycznych: doświadczenia Ośrodka Leksykologii Politycznej w Saint Cloud. [Semantic field analysis: experience of the Saint-Cloud Political Lexicography Center]. In: M. Głowiński (ed.) Język i społeczeństwo Warszawa: Czytelnik 205-282.

  • Rogers C.R. (1954). Toward a theory of creativity. Etc: A Review of General Semantics 11 249-260.

  • Roy D.D. (1996). Personality Model of Fine Artists. Creativity Research Journal 9(4) 391-394.

  • Tomasello M. (2003). Constructing a language; A usage-based theory of language. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.

  • Wagner W. (1995). Description explanation and method in social representation research. Paper on Social Representations 4(2)1-21.

  • Wagner W. Duveen G. Farr R. Jovchelovitch S. Lorenzi-Cioldi F. Markova I. Rose D. (1999). Theory and method of social representations. Asian Journal of Social Psychology 2 95-125.

  • Walker A. M. Koestner R. Hum A. (1995). Personality correlates of depressive style in autobiographies of creative achievers. Journal of Creative Behavior 29(2) 75-94.

  • Wiersma W. Jurs S. G. (2009). Research methods in education an introduction Boston: Pearson.

Search
Journal information
Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 254 93 3
PDF Downloads 156 72 3