Who is the contemporary artist? Social representation of the artist among visual art students

Karolina Pietras 1
  • 1 Pedagogical University of Cracow


The paper presents the application of semantic field analysis to the reconstruction of the social representation of the contemporary artist among visual arts students. 124 students from the Faculty of Art of the Pedagogical University of Cracow and the Academy of Fine Arts in Krakow answered an openended question: Who is the artist in our time? The narrative material was used to reconstruct the equivalents, opposites, attributes, associations, activities of the subject and activities on the subject which constitute the semantic field of the concept “contemporary artist”. The conclusions, practical implications and direction for future studies are presented.

Falls das inline PDF nicht korrekt dargestellt ist, können Sie das PDF hier herunterladen.

  • Abuhamdeh, S. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2004). The Artistic Personality: A Systems Perspective. In: R.J. Sternberg, E.L. Grigorenko, J.L. Singer (Eds). Creativity: From potential to realization. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 31-42.

  • Augustinos, M. (1981). Social Representations and Social Cognition: A Convergence of Different Traditions (Doctoral dissertation). Department of Psychology, University of Adelaide, North Terrace, Adelaide, S.A. Retrieved: January, 31, 2017 from https://digital.library.adelaide.edu.au/dspace/bitstream/2440/19758/8/02whole.pdf

  • Barron, F. (1972). Artists in the making. New York: Seminar Press.

  • Barton, K., Cattell, H. (1972). Personality characteristics of female psychology, science and art majors. Psychological Reports, 31, 807-813.

  • Burch, G.St J., Pavelis, C., Hemsley, D.R., Corr, P.J. (2006). Schizotypy and creativity in visual artists. British Journal of Psychology, 97(2), 177-190.

  • Borg, W.R. (1955). The Effect of Personality and Contact upon a Personality Stereotype. The Journal of Educational Research, 49(4), 289-294.

  • Botella, M., Zenasni, F., Lubart, T. (2011). Alexithymia and Affect Intensity of Fine Artists. Psychology of Aesthetic, Creativity and the Arts, 5(3), 251-257.

  • Cameron, J.E., Duffy, M., Glenwright, B. (2014). Singers take central stage! Personality traits and stereotypes of popular musicians. Psychology of Music, 1-13, DOI: 10.1177/0305735614543217.

  • Courtial, J.P., Kerneur, L. (1996). Les représentations de la recherche dans un domaine de la psychologie de l’éducation. Paper on social representations, 5, 127-144.

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M., Getzels, J. W., Kahn, S. P. (1984). Talent and achievement (Report). Chicago: Spencer and MacArthur Foundations.

  • Cribb, C., Gregory, A.H. (1999). Stereotypes and Personalities of Musicians. Journal of Psychology, 133(1), 104-114.

  • Dickie, G. (1974). Art and the Aesthetic: An Institutional Analysis. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

  • Flick, U. (2010). Projektowanie badania jakościowego. [Designing Qualitative Research] Warszawa: PWN.

  • Gołaszewska, M. (1986). Kim jest artysta? [Who is an artist?] Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Szkolne i Pedagogiczne.

  • Lipton, J.P.(1987). Stereotypes Concerning Musicians Within Symphony Orchestras. Journal of Psychology, 121(1), 85 – 93.

  • Maslow, A.H. (1950) Self-actualizing People: a Study of Psychological Health. Personality, Symposium 1, 11-34.

  • Maslow, A. H. (1968). Toward a psychology of being (2nd ed.). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.

  • Moscovici, S. (1963). Attitudes and opinions. Annual Review of Psychology, 14, 231–260.

  • Pelt, V., Poncelet, D. (2012) Analysis of the Semantic Field of Social Representation between Teachers and Parents of the School / Family. Papers on Social Representations, 21, 9.1-9.31.

  • Popek, S. (2003). Człowiek jako jednostka twórcza. [Humans as creative entities] Lublin: Wydawnictwo UMCS.

  • Potocka, M.A. (2011). What is art for? MOCAK Forum, 2 (2); Retrieved: September, 21, 2016, from https://en.mocak.pl/what-is-art-for-maria-anna-potocka.

  • Robin R., (1980). Badanie pól semantycznych: doświadczenia Ośrodka Leksykologii Politycznej w Saint Cloud. [Semantic field analysis: experience of the Saint-Cloud Political Lexicography Center]. In: M. Głowiński (ed.), Język i społeczeństwo, Warszawa: Czytelnik, 205-282.

  • Rogers, C.R. (1954). Toward a theory of creativity. Etc: A Review of General Semantics, 11, 249-260.

  • Roy, D.D. (1996). Personality Model of Fine Artists. Creativity Research Journal, 9(4), 391-394.

  • Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language; A usage-based theory of language. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.

  • Wagner, W. (1995). Description, explanation and method in social representation research. Paper on Social Representations, 4(2),1-21.

  • Wagner, W. Duveen, G., Farr, R., Jovchelovitch, S., Lorenzi-Cioldi, F., Markova, I., Rose, D. (1999). Theory and method of social representations. Asian Journal of Social Psychology 2, 95-125.

  • Walker, A. M., Koestner, R., Hum, A. (1995). Personality correlates of depressive style in autobiographies of creative achievers. Journal of Creative Behavior, 29(2), 75-94.

  • Wiersma, W., Jurs, S. G. (2009). Research methods in education an introduction, Boston: Pearson.


Zeitschrift + Hefte