CogMap Analyst – a quantitative analysis of the structure and content characteristics of sketch drawings of cognitive maps of urbanized spaces

Open access


The paper presents the specification of the CogMap Analyst program, which has been created for the purpose of conducting an analysis of the structure and content of sketch drawings of cognitive maps of urbanized spaces. Assumptions for this analytic tool come from the neobehavioral understanding of the concept of cognitive maps, which has its source in the works of Tolman, and from the criteria of analyzing their contents and structure, which were developed by Lynch (1960). The program serves the purpose of collecting numerical data on the quantity, size, as well as placement and distortion of objects on drawings by participants in relation to the actual layout of the terrain, which was selected by the researcher, and to the sketch’s scale. This data may be used not only to determine the measurements on drawings, but also to determine possible connections with other variables, such as personal traits of participants and formal traits of the space, according to the research goals of particular scientific studies for which the CogMap Analyst program shall be used. In this article we present the theoretical basis for the tool that we have created, we compare its characteristics with other similar methods of quantitative analysis of sketch drawings of cognitive maps, and we present in detail the mode of operation and of data analysis employed by CogMap Analyst.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Appleyard D. (1970). Notes on Urban Perception and Knowledge. Pittsburg: EDRA.

  • Arnold A. E. G. F. Burles F. Krivoruchko T. Liu I. Rey C. D. Levy R. M. Iaria G. (2013). Cognitivemapping in humans and itsrelationship to otherorientationskills. Experimental Brain Research 224(3) 359‒372.

  • Banai R. (1999). A methodology for the image of the city. Environment and Behavior B: Planning and Design 26 133‒144

  • Banerjee T. Battro A. Ellis E. Downton P. Susulowska M. & Tomaszewski T. (1977). Growing up in cities. Cambridge: MIT Press.

  • Bell A. P. Greene Th. C. Fisher J. D. & Baum A. (2004). Psychologia Środowiskowa. [Environmental psychology]. Gdańsk: Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne.

  • Bors D. Vigneau F. (2011). Sex differences on the mental rotation test: Ananalysis of item types. Learning and Individual Differences. 21(1) 129‒132.

  • Buttenfield B. P. (1986). Comparing distortion on sketch maps and misconfigurations. Professional Geographer. 38(3) 238‒246.

  • Cadwallader M. (1976). Cognitive distance in inter-urban space. In: Moore G. T. & Golledge R. G. (Eds.). EnvironmentalKnowing. Stroudsberg PA: Dowden Hutchinson & Ross 316‒324.

  • Cadwallader M. (1979). Problems in cognitivedistance: Implications for cognitivemapping. Environment and Behavior 11 559‒576.

  • Carbon C. C. Hesslinger V. M. (2013). Attitudes and cognitive distances: On the nonunitary and flexible nature of cognitive maps. Advances in Cognitive Psychology. 9(3) 121‒129.

  • Chaney D. (2010). Analyzing Mental Representations: The Contribution of Cognitive Maps. Recherche et Applications En Marketing. 25(2) 93‒115.

  • Day R. (1976). Urban distance cognition: Review and contribution. Australian Geographer. 13 193‒200.

  • Downs R. M. & Stea D. (1973). Image and environment: cognitive mapping and spatialbehavior. New Brunszwik: AldineTransaction.

  • Eppler M. J. Pfister R. (2011). Sketching as a Tool for Knowledge Management: An Interdisciplinary Literature Review on its Benefits. 11th International Conference on Knoweldge Management and Knowledge Technologies I-KNOW 2011 1‒6.

  • Foo P. Warren W. H. Duchon A.& Tarr M. J. (2005). Do humans integrate routes into a cognitive map? Map- versus landmark-based navigation of novel shortcuts. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning Memory and Cognition. 31(2) 195‒215.

  • Forbus K. D. Usher J. Chapman V. (2003). Qualitative spatial reasoning about sketch maps. 15th Annual Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence. Acapulco Mexico.

  • Forbus K. D. Usher J. Lovett A. Lockwood K.& Wetzel J. (2008). CogSketch: Opendomain sketch understanding for cognitive science research and for education. EUROGRAPHICS Workshop on Sketch-Based Interfaces and Modelling. Annecy France.

  • Frey D. (1986). Recent research on selective exposure to information. In: L. Berkowitz (Eds.). Advances in experimental social psychology. Nowy Jork: Academic Press 41‒80.

  • Hauziński A. (1997). Znaczenie pojęcia mapy i metody jego operacjonalizacji w psychologii. [Meaning of the contept of the cognitive map and methods of its operationalization in psychology]. Czasopismo psychologiczne. 4 259‒274.

  • Hutorwicz H. D. Adler F. (1911). Maps of Primitive Peoples. Bulletin of the American Geographical Society. 43(9) 669‒679.

  • Huynh N. T. U. Hall G. B. Doherty S. & Smith W. W. (2008). Interpreting urban space through cognitive map sketching and sequence analysis. The Canadian Geographer/Le Géographe canadien. 52 2 222‒240.

  • Imania F. Tabaeian M (2012). Recreating mental image with the aid of cognitive maps and its role in environmental perceptron. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences.32 53-62.

  • Ishikawa T. Daniel R. Montello D. R. (2006). Spatial knowledge acquisition from direct experience in the environment: Individual differences in the development of metric knowledge and the integration of separately learned places. Cognitive Psychology 52 93‒129.

  • Kara B. (2013). Landscape Design and Cognitive Psychology. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 82 288‒291.

  • Kelvin W. T. (1883). Electrical Units of Measurement. Popular Lectures. 1 73.

  • Kitchin R. M. (1996). Methodological convergence in cognitive mapping research: investigating configurational knowledge. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 16 3 163‒185.

  • Lewicka M. & Bańka A. (2008). Psychologia środowiskowa [Environmental psychology]. In: J. Strelau & D. Doliński (Eds.) Psychologia. Podręcznik Akademicki Tom 2 [Psychology. Academic textbook. Volume 2]. (s.497‒544). Gdańsk: Gdańskie WydawnictwoPsychologiczne

  • Lloyd R. Heivly C. (1987). Systematic distortions in urbancognitive maps. Annals of the Association of American Geographers. 77 191‒207.

  • Lynch K. (1960). The Image of the City. Massachusetts Institute of Technology and thePresident and Fellows of Harvard College.

  • Montello D. R. (1992). The geometry of environmental knowledge. Theories and Methods of Spatio-Temporal Reasoning in Geographic Space. 136‒152.

  • Nedas K. (2006). Semantic similarity of spatial scenes. PhD Thesis University of Maine Orono ME USA p. 309. Nedas K. Egenhofer M. (2008). Spatial-scene similarity queries. Transactions in GIS. 12(6) 661‒681.

  • Pinheiro J. Q. (1998). Determinants of Cognitive Maps of the World as Expressed in Sketch Maps. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 18(3) 321‒339.

  • Rovine M. J. Weisman G. D. (1989). Sketch-map variables as predictors of way-finding performance. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 9 217‒232

  • Schmeinck D. Thurston A. (2007). The influence of travel experiences and exposure to cartographic media on the ability of ten-year-old children to draw cognitive maps of the world. Scottish Geographic Journal. 123(1) 1‒15.

  • Stokols D. (1978). Environmental psychology. Annual Review of Psychology. 29 253 295.

  • Stryjewska D. Janda-Dębek B. (2013). Mental Representations And Cognitive Maps In Humans A Review Of Research And Theory. Polish Journal of Applied Psychology. 11 83‒106.

  • Tolman E. C. (1948). Cognitive maps in rats and men. Psychological Review. 55 189‒208.

  • Tolman E.C. Ritchie B. F. Kalish D. (1946). Studies in Spatial Learning. I. Orientation and the Short-Cut. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 6 1‒13.

  • Tu Huynh N. Doherty S. T. (2007). Digital Sketch-Map Drawing as an Instrument to Collect Data about Spatial Cognition. Cartographica 42 (4) 285‒296.

  • Tversky B. (1993). Cognitive maps cognitive collages and spatial mental models. In: A. Frank I & Campari (eds.). Spatial Information Theory. A Theoretical Basis for GIS : European Conference COSIT’93. Springer-Verlag Berlin s. 14‒24

  • Tversky B. (2002). What do Sketches say about Thinking. Proceedings of AAAI Spring Symposium on Sketch Understanding 205‒210.

  • Tversky B. (2003). Navigating by Mind and by Body. In: C. Freksa W. Brauer C. Habel & K. Wender (Eds.). Spatial Cognition III. Routes and Navigation Human Memory and Learning Spatial Representation and Spatial Learning Springer-Verlag GmbH & Co. KG Berlin 1‒9.

  • Tversky B. (2008) Spatial Cognition. Embodied and Situated. In: P. Robbins & M. Aydede(Eds.) The Cambridge handbook of situated cognition. Cambridge University Press Cambridge 201‒216.

  • Wojciszke B. (1980). Zależność spostrzegania interpersonalnego od postawy wobec religii osoby spostrzegającej i spostrzeganej. [Dependency of interpersonal perception to the religious attitudes of the perceiver and observator]. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego Psychologia 3 29 46.

  • Wojciszke B. (2002). Człowiek wśród ludzi. [Man among men]. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.

  • Wong K. Y. (1979). Maps in minds: An empirical study. Environment and Planning A. 11 1289‒1304.

Journal information
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 239 83 6
PDF Downloads 102 43 2