Assessment of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Newcoming Romanian Entrepreurial Universities

Open access


In the dynamic changing environment, entrepreneurial universities have been playing an increasingly important role for socio-economic innovation and development. The aim of this study is to perform an analysis, involving the observation of the dimensions of entrepreneurial universities. We consider that nowadays the evaluation of universities should take into consideration the tools that school leaders, professors and students may use to evaluate teaching programs in innovation and entrepreneurship. As a result of the fact that the tertiary education institutions are appreciated by the way they relate to the social and economic needs and characteristics of the individuals, the Romanian universities are currently pursuing and trying to undergo a development process making the shift from a classical university to an entrepreneurial university. Specific literature has argued that the dynamic culture of the entrepreneurial university encourage students and graduates to new innovative and entrepreneurial initiatives and increase their employability. The purpose of the current paper is to inspire debates and actual steps to be taken so as higher education institutions in Romania to become even more competitive and support economic growth by fully embracing the role of entrepreneurial universities. Research methodology includes the application of the questionnaire conceived by the HEInnovate team in two universities from Romania, authors comparing the results through a qualitative analysis and interpretation within the European framework. Results underline a similarity between the responses among the seven pillars of HEInnovate tool, but given the area of influence we identify the gaps and propose specific recommendations for short and long-term future. The conclusions of paper area meant to enhance performance in development of innovation and entrepreneurial skills in students in North-East region of Romania, with the aim to raise the region’s competitive edge.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Bercovitz J. & Feldmann M. (2006). Janet Bercovitz 1 Maryann Feldmann 2. Technology 175–188.

  • Bledow R. Frese M. Anderson N. Erez M. & Farr J. (2009). A Dialectic Perspective on Innovation: Conflicting Demands Multiple Pathways and Ambidexterity. Industrial and Organizational Psychology2(03) 305–337.

  • Clark B. R. (1998). Clark Burton R. Creating Entrepreneurial Universities. Organizational Pathways of Transformation (C) 180.

  • Croitoru A. (2012). Schumpeter J.A. 1934 (2008) The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits Capital Credit Interest and the Business Cycle translated from the German by Redvers Opie News Brunswick (U.S.A) and London (U.K.): Transaction Publishers. A re. Journal of Comparative Research in Anthropology and Sociology3(2) 137–148.

  • Davidsson P. (2004). Researching entrepreneurship. New York: Springer.

  • Drucker P. (2001). An excerpt from The Essential Drucker. Retrieved from file:///C:/Users/Cecilia/Downloads/The_Essential_Drucker__The_Best_of_Sixty_Year s_of_Peter_Drucker’s_Essential_Writings_on_Management.pdf

  • Drucker P. F. (2008). Management: revised edition. New York: HarperCollins.

  • Dunning J. H. (2002). Regions Globalization and the Knowledge-Based Economy. Retrieved from

  • Etzkowitz H. (2004). Evolution of the Entrepreneurial University. International Journal of Technology and Globalization (Vol. 1).

  • Gibb A. Haskins G. Hannon P. Robertson I. Gibb A. Haskins G. … Robertson I. (2012). EULP_-_LEADERS_PAPER_final_dec_19.

  • Hebert R. & Link A. (1989). In Search of the Meaning of Entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics (Vol. 1).

  • Junior Achievement Romania (2016) Proiect “Universitatea Antreprenorială”. Available at:

  • Kliewe T. (2017). Entrepreneurial and engaged university accreditation.

  • Lazzeretti L. & Tavoletti E. (2005). Higher education excellence and local economic development: The case of the entrepreneurial University of Twente. European Planning Studies13(3) 475–493.

  • Lee S. H. Peng M. W. & Song S. (2013). Governments entrepreneurs and positive externalities: A real options perspective. European Management Journal 31(4) 333-347.

  • Levy F. & Murnane R. (2005). How Computerized Work and Globalization Shape Human Skill Demands.

  • Nooteboom B. & Went R. (2008). Innovation and Organisation. Microfoundations for Innovation Policy.

  • Perkins D. (1999). The Many Faces of Constructivism. Educational Leadership (Vol. 57).

  • Rotherham A. J. & Willingham D. T. (2010). “21st-Century” skills. American Educator 17 17-20.

  • Salamzadeh A. Salamzadeh Y. & Daraei M. (2011). Toward a systematic framework for an entrepreneurial university: a study in Iranian context with an IPOO model.

  • Stephan U. & Uhlaner L. M. (2010). Performance-based vs socially supportive culture: A cross-national study of descriptive norms and entrepreneurship. Journal of International Business Studies41(8) 1347–1364.

  • Stevenson H. H. & Jarillo J. C. (1990). A paradigm of entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurial management. Strategic Management Journal 11 17-27.

  • Taucean I. M. Strauti A. G. & Tion M. (2018). Roadmap to Entrepreneurial University – Case study. Procedia -Social and Behavioral Sciences238 582–589.

  • UNESCO (2005) From the Information Society to Knowledge Societies. UNESCO Publishing Paris France.

  • Westwood R. & Low D. R. (2003). The multicultural muse: Culture creativity and innovation. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management3(2) 235–259.

  • Wilson K. E. Vyakarnam S. Volkmann C. Mariotti S. & Rabuzzi D. (2009). Educating the Next Wave of Entrepreneurs: Unlocking Entrepreneurial Capabilities to Meet the Global Challenges of the 21st Century. Ssrn (April).

  • Accessed on 29.01.2018

Journal information
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 21 21 10
PDF Downloads 24 24 14