Innovation needs deregulation: the case of taxi and private hire companies

Open access


Every year seems to bring about new technologies that radically change the way we do things. New innovative business models come to life, that change the way the world works so much that a shift of mindset is required if we are to keep up. These days, the largest transport company in the world owns no cars, the largest accommodation provider owns no real estate, the largest retailer by value has no inventory of its own, and the most popular media owner creates no content. But what about the role of regulation in this brave new world? We take a look at the rivals, taxi companies and private hire transport companies (in particular Uber), to assess the need for regulation and the impact of regulation on these two contenders. Our research examines the effects of said regulation on service quality and safety, correlated with consumer opinion data. The impact of non-regulatory incentives on the two seemingly-opposed business models is discussed, thus making the logical case for increased deregulation of both taxis and private hire companies. Opening the way to innovative companies and innovative new business models, allowing them to change the world is our gateway to growth, prosperity and sustainability.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Dostmohammad S. & Long J. (2015). Regulating the Sharing Economy. Retrieved from Canadian Association of Programs in Public Administration:

  • Agerpres. (2016). COTAR: ANAF a cerut Uber o listă cu toți utilizatorii; un șofer din Capitală a încasat 60.000 lei în 2015. Bucharest Romania. Retrieved from

  • Bosman R. (2015). Fast Company. Retrieved from Fast Company:

  • Biber E.. Light S. Ruhl J.B. Salzman J. (2017). Regulating Business Innovation as Policy Disruption: From the Model T to Airbnb. Vanderblit Law Review 70(5) 1561-1626.

  • Credit Suisse. (2015). Global Equity Themes. The Sharing Economy. Retrieved from

  • Dyal-Chand R. (2015). Regulating Sharing: The Sharing Economy as an Alternative Capitalist System. Tualne Law Review 90(2) 241-309.

  • Feeney M. (2015). Is Ridesharing Safe? Washington DC: Cato Institute. Retrieved from

  • Ghenciu T. (2017). Cat castiga un sofer Uber intr-o luna. Digi24. Retrieved 11 28 2017 from

  • Hall P. & Soskice D. (2001). Introduction to Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford: Oxford.

  • Hobica G. (2016). 7 Reasons I`m Not On Board With Uber. Huffington Post. Retrieved from

  • Meelen T. & Frenken K. (2015). Fast Company. Retrieved from Fast Company:

  • Miller S. (2015). First Principles for Regulation the Sharing Economy. Harvard Journal on Legislation 53 147-202.

  • Prelipceanu M. (2017). Cum răspunde UBER acuzațiilor taximetriștilor. Bucharest Romania: RFI Romania. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Ranchordas S. (2015). Does Sharing Mean Caring? Regulation Innovation in the Sharing Economy. Legal Studies Research Paper Series 16(1) 1-63.

  • Rhodes A. (2017). Uber: Which Countries Have Banned the Controversial Taxi App. Retrieved from

Journal information
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 555 231 17
PDF Downloads 466 191 19