Mechanisms underlying major investment projects in the Romanian public administration: strong and long term collaboration among stakeholders

Open access

Abstract

Starting from the existing situation, in order to understand the mechanisms underlying investment projects financed from public funds in Romania, we analysed the following public sources of information: For projects implemented before 2007, we analysed data available on the Internet, including databases of international donors such as www.dgmarket.com, http://www.ted.europa.eu/, etc. We analysed data made available by the Public Procurement Electronic System through the portal http://data.gov.ro. The data set analysed includes over 8 million awarding contract notices. For the EU funded projects, we requested the Ministry of European Funds to offer us access to the relevant database (SMIS), which includes all the projects financed under the European funding programme 2007 – 2013 (projects implemented before 31.12.2015). Comparing data from all these sources leads to the conclusion that the information is coherent and represents a credible basis for our analysis. We found that 48% of all investment projects implemented in Romania in 2007 – 2016 and co-funded under European funds (in terms of the share of eligible expenses) requested outsourcing services for the preparation of the project documentation needed to apply for funds; such expenses represent almost 3 % of the total eligible project expenses approved. Almost 36% (in terms of the share of eligible expenses) of all investment projects implemented in Romania in 2007 – 2016 and co-funded under European funds, revealed a strong and long term relationship between the company that participates in the elaboration of the grant application and the beneficiary of funds. This collaboration continued throughout the implementation of the project. These companies delivered services / supplied goods / carried out construction works whose value exceeds 15 billion lei, which represents over 54% of the total eligible costs of the respective projects.

Aarseth, W., Ahola, T., Aaltonen, K., Økland, A., & Andersen, B. (2017). Project sustainability strategies: a systematic literature review. International Journal of Project Management, 35(6), 1071-1083.

Alami, A. (2016). Why Do Information Technology Projects Fail?. Procedia Computer Science, 100, 62-71.

Hussein, B. A., Ahmad, S. B., & Zidane, Y. J. (2015). Problems Associated with Defining Project Success. Procedia Computer Science, 64, 940-947.

Ika, L. A., & Donnelly, J. (2017). Success conditions for international development capacity building projects. International Journal of Project Management, 35(1), 44-63.

Islam, S., Mouratidis, H., & Weippl, E. R. (2014). An empirical study on the implementation and evaluation of a goal-driven software development risk management model. Information and Software Technology, 56(2), 117-133.

Ministry of Transport. (2016). Master Planul General de Transport al României (The General Master Plan for Transport in Romania). Retrieved from Documente Master Plan: http://mt.gov.ro/web14/strategia-in-transporturi/master-plan-general-transport/documente-master-plan1.

Ministry of European Funds. (2007-2013). SMIS. Retrieved from Ministerul Fondurilor Europene / Ministry of European Funds: www.fonduri-ue.ro.

Niazi, M., Mahmood, S., Alshayeb, M., Qureshi, A. M., Faisal, K., & Cerpa, N. (2016). Toward successful project management in global software development. International Journal of Project Management, 34(8), 1553-1567.

Niazi, M., Mahmood, S., Alshayeb, M., Riaz, M. R., Faisal, K., Cerpa, N., ... & Richardson, I. (2016). Challenges of project management in global software development: A client-vendor analysis. Information and Software Technology, 80, 1-19.

Olsson, N. O., & Berg-Johansen, G. (2016). Aspects of project ownership in theory and practice. Procedia Computer Science, 100, 790-795.

Papke-Shields, K. E., & Boyer-Wright, K. M. (2017). Strategic planning characteristics applied to project management. International Journal of Project Management, 35(2), 169-179.

Patanakul, P., Kwak, Y. H., Zwikael, O., & Liu, M. (2016). What impacts the performance of large-scale government projects?. International Journal of Project Management, 34(3), 452-466.

Samset, K., & Volden, G. H. (2016). Front-end definition of projects: Ten paradoxes and some reflections regarding project management and project governance. International Journal of Project Management, 34(2), 297-313.

Savolainen, P., & Ahonen, J. J. (2015). Knowledge lost: Challenges in changing project manager between sales and implementation in software projects. International Journal of Project Management, 33(1), 92-102.

The Agency for Romania’s Digital Agenda / Agenția pentru Agenda Digitală a României (A.A.D.R.). (2017). SEAP - Sistemul Electronic Național pentru Achiziții Publice. Retrieved from SEAP - Sistemul Electronic Național pentru Achiziții Publice / The Electronic National System for Public Procurements: www.e-licitatie.ro.

The Romanian Government. (2005, 12 31). National DEvelopment Plan 2007 - 2013. Retrieved from Ministry of Public Finance: http://discutii.mfinante.ro/static/10/Mfp/pnd/pnd_20071.htm.

The Romanian Government / General Secretariat of the Government. (2017, \). Central access point for open data. Retrieved 02 07, 2017, from Central access point for open data: http://data.gov.ro.

Wang, Y., Wang, N., Jiang, L., Yang, Z., & Cui, V. (2016). Managing relationships with power advantage buyers: The role of supplier initiated bonding tactics in long-term buyer–supplier collaborations. Journal of Business Research, 69(12), 5587-5596.

Journal Information

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 169 133 11
PDF Downloads 86 78 4